Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Performance of Chinese Elite Archers

Background: Previous studies have found a correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in sporting events which require physical competence. Such correlation, however, has not been well studied in technique-oriented sports. This study explored the corre-lation between 2D:4D and sporting performance of Chinese elite archers. Also it provides some references for sports research in other fields. Methods: We conducted the study with 31 Chinese elite archers (15 males and 16 females) preparing for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games and collected their 2D:4D ratios by measuring their index and ring fingers. The study also asked them to take physical fitness tests including push-ups, decline sit-ups, half-squat and a 4000-meter run, and obtained their results in former ranking tournaments and Olympic elimination series. The study recorded every entry of data in a “mean ± standard deviation” (M ± SD) format and processed them in SPSS 24.0 to produce One-Way ANOVA and Pearson correlations. Results: Our study found no significant difference between varied sporting levels in the left 2D:4D, and between world-class and national-level archers in the right 2D:4D (p > 0.05), yet a signifi-cant one between left-right 2D:4D of world-class, national-level, and level-1 archers (p < 0.01). We also found no significant correlation between the left 2D:4D and specific physical fitness test results, and between those archers’ results. Similarly, there was a significant negative correlation between the right 2D:4D and specific test results (p < 0.05), and a strong negative correlation between that and results of ranking tournaments (p < 0.01) and Olympic elimination series (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Chinese elite archers with lower right 2D:4D are of better physical fitness and enhanced sport performance. Hence, the right 2D:4D may act as a critical indicator in selecting excellent archers.

archery; finger length ratio; performance; correlation; sports selection

[1] Brazo-Sayavera J, Martínez-Valencia M A, Müller L, An-dronikos G, Martindale RJJ. Identifying talented track and field athletes: The impact of relative age effect on selection to the Spanish National Athletics Federation training camps. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2017; 35: 2172–2178.

[2] Wang Y, Chen X. Analysis of the Progress of Archery Research in China since 1998. Sport Science Research. 2017; 9.

[3] Vrublevskiy E, Skrypko A, Asienkiewicz R. Individualization of selection and training of female athletes in speed-power athletics from the perspective of gender identity. Physical Education of Students. 2020; 24: 227–234.

[4] Stibbard-Hawkes DNE. No Association between 2D:4D Ratio and Hunting Success among Hadza Hunters. Human Nature. 2020; 31: 22–42.

[5] Manning JT. Digit ratio. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, New Jersey. 2002.

[6] Ribeiro E, Neave N, Morais RN, Manning JT. Direct Versus In-direct Measurement of Digit Ratio (2D:4D) a critical review of the literature and new data. Evolutionary Psychology. 2016; 14: 1474704916632536.

[7] Malas MA, Dogan S, Hilal Evcil E, Desdicioglu K. Fetal devel-opment of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Human Development. 2006; 82: 469–475.

[8] Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction. 1998; 13: 3000–3004.

[9] Acar H, Tutkun E. Analysis of the 2D:4D ratios of national and amateur football players. International Journal of Applied Exer-cise Physiology. 2019; 8: 132–137.

[10] Manning JT, Kilduff LP, Trivers R. Digit ratio (2D:4D) in Kline-felter’s syndrome. Andrology. 2013; 1: 94–99.

[11] Voracek M, Reimer B, Ertl C, Dressler SG. Digit Ratio (2D:4D), Lateral Preferences, and Performance in Fencing. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2006; 103: 427–446.

[12] Bennett M, Manning JT, Cook CJ, Kilduff LP. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in elite rugby players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2010; 28: 1415–1421.

[13] Longman D, Stock JT, Wells JCK. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and rowing ergometer performance in males and females. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2011; 144: 337–341.

[14] Schorer J, Rienhoff R, Westphal H, Baker J. Digit ratio effects between expertise levels in American football players. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence. 2013; 5: 113–116.

[15] Sudhakar HH, Veena UB, Tejaswi RN. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in Indian swimmers. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2013; 57: 72–76.

[16] Frick NA, Hull MJ, Manning JT, Tomkinson GR. Relationships between digit ratio (2D:4D) and basketball performance in Aus-tralian men. American Journal of Human Biology. 2017; 29: e22937.

[17] Hönekopp J, T. Manning J, Müller C. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior. 2006; 49: 545–549.

[18] Kim RN, Lee JH, Hong SH, Jeon JH, Jeong WK. The Char-acteristics of Shoulder Muscles in Archery Athletes. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2018; 21: 145–150.

[19] Kanchan T, Kumar GP, Menezes RG. Index and ring finger ratio—a new sex determinant in south Indian population. Foren-sic Science International. 2008; 181: 53.e1–53.e4.

[20] Eklund E, Ekström L, Thörngren JO, Ericsson M, Berglund B, Hirschberg AL. Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Physical Performance in Female Olympic Athletes. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020; 11: 292.

[21] Keshavarz M, Bayati M, Farzad B, Dakhili A, Agha-Alinejad H. The second to Fourth Digit Ratio in Elite and Non-Elite Greco-Roman Wrestlers. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2017; 60: 145–151.

[22] Manning JT, Taylor RP. Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001; 22: 61–69.

[23] Dang XY, Zhang J, Liang ZD, Chen HY, Ying D, Zhang Q. A Correlation Analysis on Digital Ratio and Athletic Ability of Swimming Athletes. Journal of Beijing Sport University. 2011; 2: 135–137.

[24] Qin XL. Relationship between Index Finger to Ring Finger Length Ratio (2D:4D) and Athletic Ability Among fencer. Jour-nal of Sports and Science. 2011; 32: 69–71.

[25] Williams JHG, Greenhalgh KD, Manning JT. Second to fourth finger ratio and possible precursors of developmental psy-chopathology in preschool children. Early Human Development. 2003; 72: 57–65.

[26] Kim H, Kim S, So W. The Relative Importance of Performance Factors in Korean Archery. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015; 29: 1211–1219.

[27] Hönekopp J, Schuster M. A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: Substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010; 48: 4–10.

[28] Manning J, Kilduff L, Cook C, Crewther B, Fink B. Digit ra-tio (2D:4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2014; 5: 9.

[29] Wu Y, Zhang L, Wu Y. Correlation between finger length ratio and physical fitness in youth in Guangdong. Journal of Anatomy. 2019; 42: 60–63.

[30] Ren Z, Du X, Hang GG. Correlation between index finger and ring finger length ratio (2D:4D) and running economy. Journal of Guangzhou Sports Institute. 2016; 36: 97–101.

[31] Klapprodt KL. Relationships Between the Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Game-Related Statistics Iin Professional and Semi-Professional Male Basketball Players [Dissertation]. The Uni-versity of North Dakota. 2018.

[32] Klapprodt KL, Fitzgerald JS, Short SE, Manning JT, Tomkinson GR. Relationships between the digit ratio (2D:4D) and game-related statistics in professional and semi-professional male bas-ketball players. American Journal of Human Biology. 2018; 30: e23182.

[33] Saenz J, Alexander GM. Digit ratios (2D:4D), postnatal testos-terone and eye contact in toddlers. Biological Psychology. 2013; 94: 106–108.

[34] Kanchan T, Kumar GP, Menezes RG. Index and ring finger ratio–A new sex determinant in south Indian population. Foren-sic Science International. 2008; 181: 53.e1–53.e4.