TESTOSTERONE AND SELF-PERCEIVED MASCULINITY IN AN AUSTRALIAN COHORT OF COMMUNITY-DWELLING MEN

Background and objective

Traditional masculinity is characterised by traits of independence, toughness, assertiveness, competitive-ness and physical competence. Multiple factors modulate the expression of masculinity, including age, social class, ethnicity and occupation. While there is a perception that physiological testosterone concen-tration impacts self-perceived masculinity in men, there are limited supporting data. This study aimed to examine the relationship between testosterone concentration and self-perceived masculinity as measured by the Masculinity in Chronic Disease Inventory (MCD-I), controlling for health-related and biopsycho-social factors in community-dwelling, middle-aged to elderly men.

Materials and methods

Participants were drawn from a longitudinally followed cohort (N=1195) of men participating in the Florey Adelaide Male Aging Study based in Adelaide, Australia. A final sample of 460 (mean age 65.15, stan-dard deviation 9.72) men consisted of those with serum testosterone concentrations measured at wave one (2002–2005) and wave two (2007–2010), and who, in 2017, completed the Masculinity in Chronic Disease Inventory questionnaire and provided information related to demographics, medical conditions, health and lifestyle behaviours.

Adjusted multivariable regression analyses were undertaken to determine the relationship between serum testosterone concentration at wave 2 and MCD-1 total masculinity score and sub-scores. Given the temporal difference between the testosterone concentration assessment and MCD-1 completion, a further analysis was performed including participants with a stable serum testosterone concentration over a 5-year period.

Results

There was no association between serum testosterone concentration and MCD-1 total masculinity score (p = 0.54) or sub-scores (p = 0.12–0.85). There was also no association between testosterone concentration and total masculinity score in men with stable serum testosterone over time (p = 0.35). Testosterone con-centration was associated with serum sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentration (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), waist circumference (p < 0.001) and a history of diabetes (p = 0.021). Total masculinity score was lower in men without a partner (widowed p < 0.013, separated/divorced p < 0.019), a history of anxiety (p = 0.036) and moderate (p = 0.05) to severe erectile dysfunction (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study provides evidence against the perception that physiological testosterone concentration impacts self-perceived masculinity. Rather, in middle-aged to older men, self-perceived masculinity is abrogated by psychosocial factors and chronic physical disorders.

testosterone; masculinity; MCD-I; partner; erectile dysfunction

1. Canham. The interaction of masculinity and control and its impact on the experience of suffering for an older man. J Aging Stud 2009;23(2):90–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2008.12.003

2. Chambers SK, Hyde MK, Oliffe JL, et al. Measuring masculinity in the context of chronic disease. Psychol Men Mascul 2016;17(3):228–42. https://doi. org/10.1037/men0000018

3. Kachel S, Steffens M, Niedlick C. Traditional mas-culinity and femininity: Validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Front Psychol 2016;7:956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956

4. Connell R, Messerschmidt J. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender Soc 2005;19(5):829–

59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639

5. Tannenbaum C, Frank B. Masculinity and health in late life men. Am J Mens Health 2011;5(3):243–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988310384609

6. Stergiou-Kita M, Mansfield E, Calantonio A, Moody J, Mantis S. What’s gender got to do with it? Examining masculinities, health and safety and return to work in male dominated skilled trades. Work 2016;54(3):721–33. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162322

7. Stergiou-Kita M, Mansfield E, Bezo R, et al. Danger zone: Men, masculinity and occupational health and safety in high risk occupations. Saf Sci 2015;1(80): 213–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.029

8. Snyder P, Bhasin S, Cunninghma G, et al. Effects of testosterone treatment in older men. N Engl J Med 2016;374(7):611–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506119

9. Hackett G, Cole N, Bhartia M, Kennedy D, Raju J, Wilkinson P. Testosterone replacement therapy with long acting testosterone undecanoate improves sexual function and quality of life parameters vs. placebo in a population of men with type 2 diabetes. J Sex Med 2013;10:1612–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12146

10. Welling L, Moreua B, Bird B, Hansend S, Carré JM. Exogenous testosterone increases men’s perception of their own physical dominance. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016;64:136–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.11.016

11. Carre J, Geniole S, Ortiz T, Bird BM, Videto A, Bonin PL. Exogenous testosterone rapidly increases aggressive behaviour in dominant and impulsive men. Biol Psychiatry 2016;82(4):249–56. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.009

12. Bhasin S, Storer T, Berman N, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med 1996;335(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM1996 07043350101

13. Dudek P, Kozakowski J, Zgliczynski W. Late onset hypogonadism. Menopause Rev 2017;16(2):66–9. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2017.68595

14. Surampudi P, Swerdloff R, Wang C. An update on male hypogonadism therapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014;15(9):1247–64. https://doi.org/1 0.1517/14656566.2014.913022

15. Baucom DH, Besch PK, Callaham S. Relationship between testosterone concentration, sex role iden-tity and personality among females. J Personal Soc Psychol 1985;48(5):1218–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.48.5.1218

16. McIntyre M, Li A, Chapman J, Lipson SF, Ellison PT. Social status, masculinity and testoster-one in young men. Pers Individ Diff 2011;51:392–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.015

17. Shi Z, Araujo AB, Martin S, O’Loughlin P, Wittert GA. Longitudinal changes in testosterone over 5 years in community dwelling men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98(8):3289–97. https://doi. org/10.1210/jc.2012-3842

18. Camacho EM, Huhtaniemi IT, O’Neill TW, et al. Age-associated changes in hypothalamic- pituitary-testicular function in middle-aged and older men are modified by weight change and lifestyle fac-tors: Longitudinal results from the European Male Ageing Study. Eur J Endocrinol 2013;168(3):445–

55. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0890

19. Carver L, Vafaei A, Guerra R, Freire A, Phillips SP. Gender differences: Examination of the 12-item Bem Sex Role inventory (BSRI-12) in an older Brazilian population. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e766356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076356

20. Ahmed T, Vafaei A, Belanger E, Phillips SP, Zunzunegui M-V. Bem Sex Role Inventory valida-tion in the international mobility in aging Angelier study. Can J Aging 2016;35(3):348–60. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0714980816000404

21. Thompson EH, Bennett KM. Measurement of mas-culinity ideologies: A (critical) review. Psychol Men Mascul 2015;9:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038609

22. Occhipinti S, Laurie K, Hyde M, et al. Measuring masculinity in men with chronic disease. Am J Mens Health 2019;13(4):1557988319859706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988319859706

23. Martin SA, Appleton SL, Vakulin A, et al. The association of obstructive sleep apnoea and noctur-nal hypoxaemia with the development of abnormal HbA1c in a population cohort of men without diabe-tes. Diab Res Clin Pract 2006;114:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2015.12.007

24. Tsang VWL, Skead C, Wassersug RJ, Palmer-Hague JL. Impact of prostate cancer treatments on men’s understanding of their masculinity. Psychol Men Mascul 2019;20(2):214–225. https://doi. org/10.1037/men0000184

25. Chambers SK, Chung E, Wittert G, Hyde MK. Erectile dysfunction, masculinity, and psychosocial outcomes: A review of the experiences of men after prostate cancer treatment. Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(1):60–8. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.12

26. Yang X, Lau JTF, Wang Z. The mediation roles of discrepancy stress and self-esteem between mascu-line role discrepancy and mental health problems. J Affect Disord 2018;1(235):513–20. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.085

27. Wong YJ, Ho MR, Wang, SY. Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. J Counsel Psychol 2017;64(1):80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000176

28. Jack L, Toston T, Jack NH, Sims M. A gender cen-tered ecological framework targeting Black men living with diabetes: Integrating a “masculinity” perspective in diabetes management and education research. Am J Mens Health 2010;4(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308321956

29. Liburd LC, Namageyo-Funa A, Jack L. Understanding “masculinity” and the challenges of management type 2 diabetes among African American men. J Natl Med Assoc 2007;99(5):550–2.

30. Dale C, Angus J, Nielson L, et al. “I’m no super-man”: Understanding diabetic men, masculinity and cardiac rehabilitation. Qual Health Res 2015;25(12): 1648–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314566323

31. Rochelle T. Cross cultural differences in the rela-tionship between conformity to masculine norms and health behaviour among men in Hong Kong. Br J Health Psychol 2019;24:159–74. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjhp.12345

32. Gerdes Z, Levant R. Complex relationships among masculine norms and health/well-being outcomes: Correlation patterns of the conformity to mas-culine norms inventory subscales. Am J Mens Health 2018;12(2):229–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1557988317745910

33. Ulloa J, Sun C, Rhodes S. The intersection between masculinity and health among rural immigrant Latino men. Int J Mens Health 2017;16(1):84–95.

34. Macdonald N, Ebert P. Marital status and age as related to masculine and feminine personal-ity dimensions and self esteem. J Soc Psychol 2000;127(3):289–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/002245 45.1987.9713694

35. Bandini J, Thompson E. “Widowerhood”: Masculinities and spousal loss in the late 1960s. OMEGA 2013;68(2):123–41. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.68.2.c