Article Data

  • Views 94
  • Dowloads 11

Original Research

Open Access

COMPARISON OF UPPER AND LOWER BODY’S ANAEROBIC POWER IN VISUALLY IMPAIRED JUDO AND GOALBALL ATHLETES

  • Kun Ho Lee1,2
  • Sukho Lee3
  • Jinho Park3

1Department of Prescription and Rehabilitation of Exercise, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

2Department of Icheon Training Center, Korea Paralympic Committee, Icheon, Republic of Korea

3Department of Counseling, Health and Kinesiology, College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, San Antonio, TX, USA

DOI: 10.31083/jomh.v16i3.278 Vol.16,Issue 3,July 2020 pp.87-97

Published: 16 July 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Jinho Park E-mail: jinho04oo@gmail.com

PDF (700.62 kB)

Abstract

Background and objective

While there are many studies done on goalball and judo athletes, our study focuses on comparing and identifying the upper and lower body’s anaerobic power in world-class visually impaired goalball and judo athletes.

Material and methods

The subjects of this study were visually impaired male athletes who had earned a medal in judo (n = 4) and goalball (n = 5). Anaerobic power of the upper and lower body was measured with the Wingate test. We measured the peak power, peak power/body weight, mean power, mean power/body weight, rate of fatigue, and blood lactate concentration.

Results

Goalball athletes showed a significantly lower all-out lactate concentration than judo athletes (2.80 ± 0.33/9.18 ± 1.18, P < 0.05). Goalball athletes showed a significantly lower rate of fatigue than judo athletes in the upper body (58.1 ±1.61, P < 0.05), while judo athletes showed a significantly lower rate of fatigue than goalball athletes in the lower body (60.5 ± 1.04, P < 0.05). Goalball athletes showed a significantly higher upper and lower body ratio in the mean power than judo athletes (0.76 ± 0.01/0.67 ± 0.04, P < 0.05). In the upper and lower body ratio on the rate of fatigue, judo athletes showed high fatigue in the upper body, while goalball athletes showed low fatigue (1.24 ± 0.09, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Visually impaired goalball athletes have higher anaerobic power in the upper body than the lower body whereas visually impaired judo athletes have higher anaerobic power in the lower body than the upper body.

Keywords

anaerobic power; goalball; judo; Paralympic; visual impairment 

Cite and Share

Kun Ho Lee,Sukho Lee,Jinho Park. COMPARISON OF UPPER AND LOWER BODY’S ANAEROBIC POWER IN VISUALLY IMPAIRED JUDO AND GOALBALL ATHLETES. Journal of Men's Health. 2020. 16(3);87-97.

References

1. Sasadai J, Maeda N, Shimizu R, Kobayashi, T., Sakai, S., Komiya, M. et al. Analysis of team-sport wheelchair falls during the Rio 2016 Summer Paralympic Games: A video-based cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e033088. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033088.

2. Rosa JPP, Silva A, Rodrigues DF, Menslin, R., Araújo, L. T., Vital, R. et al. Association between hormonal status, stress, recovery, and motiva-tion of Paralympic swimmers. Res Q Exerc Sport 2020;3:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019. 1696929.

3. Legg D. Paralympic games: History and legacy of a global movement. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018;29:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr. 2018.01.008.

4. Aslan CS. Effects of body composition on achieve-ment in goalball. J Phy Fit Treat Sports 2018;3. https://doi:10.19080/jpfmts.2018.03.555603.

5. Goulart-Siqueira G, Benítez-Flores S, Ferreira AR, Zagatto, A. M., Foster, C., & Boullosa, D. Relationships between different field test perfor-mance measures in elite goalball players. Sports 2019;7:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7010006.

6. Çolak T, Bamaç B, Aydin M, Meriç, B., & Özbek, A. Physical fitness levels of blind and visually impaired goalball team players. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2004;12:247–252. https://10.3233/IES-2004-0182.

7. Molik B, Morgulec-Adamowicz N, Kosmol A, Perkowski, K., Bednarczuk, G., Skowroński, W., et al. Game performance evaluation in male goal-ball players. J Hum Kinet. 2015;48:43-51. https://doi. org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0090.

8. Morato MP, Menezes RP, Fonseca S, & da Cunha Furtado, O. L. P. Faster balls increase the prob-ability of scoring a goal in female and male elite goalball. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte 2018;40:427–434. https://doi:10.1016/j. rbce.2018.03.027.

9. Romana Romanov BM, Stupar D, Jezdimirovic T, Garunovic B. The connection between certain mor-phological parameters and results in goalball play-ers. Int J Morphol. 2017;35(4):1396–1402. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022017000401396.

10. Monezi LA, Magalhaes TP, Morato MP, Mercadante, LA., Furtado, OLPDC, & Misuta, M. S. Time-motion analysis of goalball players in attacks: Differences of the player positions and the throw-ing techniques. Sport Biomech. 2019;18:470–481. https://doi:10.1080/14763141.2018.1433871.

11. Fagher K, Hassan Ahmed O, Pernheim N, & Varkey, E. Prevalence of sports-related injuries in paralympic judo: An exploratory study. J Sci Med Sport 2019;22:902–906. https://doi:10.1016/j. jsams.2019.03.005.

12. Franchini E, Julio UF, Panissa VL, Lira, FS., Gerosa-Neto, J., & Branco, BH.. High-intensity intermittent training positively affects aerobic and anaerobic performance in judo athletes independently of exercise mode. Front Physiol. 2016;7:268. https://doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00268.

13. Degoutte F, Jouanel P, Filaire E. Energy demands during a judo match and recovery. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37:245–249. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm. 37.3.245.

14. Alves IDS, Kalva-Filho CA, Aquino R, Travitzki, L., Tosim, A., Papoti, M., et al. Relationships between aerobic and anaerobic parameters with game technical performance in elite goalball athletes. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1636. https://

doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01636.

15. Aras D, Güler Ö, Gülü M, Akça, F., Arslan, E., & Akalan, C. Comparison of balance skills of visu-ally impaired and non-impaired judo athletes and goalball/ futsal players. Phys Educ Stud. 2018;22:292–

297. https://doi:10.15561/20755279.2018.0602.

16. Santos CdN, Carvalho TLd, Felício LR, Mainenti MRM, Vigário PdS. Postural control in athletes with different degrees of visual impairment. J Phys Educ. 2018;29:1–9. https://doi.org/10.4025.

17. Hrysomallis C. Balance ability and athletic performance. Sports Med. 2011;41:221-32. http://doi.org/10.2165/11538560-000000000-00000

18. Julio UF, Panissa VLG, Cury RL, Agostinho, M. F., Esteves, J. V., & Franchini, E. Energy system con-tributions in upper and lower body wingate tests in highly trained athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport 2019;90:244–250. https://doi:10.1080/02701367.201 9.1576839.

19. Harvey L, Wiegand A, Solomon C, et al. A comparison of upper and lower body energetics during high-intensity exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015;55:708-13.

20. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie, Y., Cederholm, T., Landi, F. et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 2010;39:412–423. https://doi. org/10.1093/ageing/afq034.

21. Ogonowska A, Hübner-Woźniak E, Kosmol A, & Gromisz, W. Anaerobic capacity of upper extrem-ity muscles of male and female swimmers.Biomed Hum Kinetics 2009;1:79–82. https://doi. org/10.2478/

v10101-009-0020-z.

22. Lovell DI, Mason D, Delphinus E, & McLellan, C. A comparison of asynchronous and synchronous arm cranking during the Wingate test. Int J Sport Physiol. 2011;6:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.6.3.419.

23. Beneke R, Pollmann C, Bleif I, Leithäuser, R., & Hütler, M. How anaerobic is the Wingate anaerobic test for humans? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;87:388–

392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-002-0622-4.

24. Duvillard SP. Exercise lactate levels: Simulation and reality of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;86:3–5. https://doi.org/10.0007/s004210100515.

25. Zajac A, Jarzabek R, Waskiewicz Z. The diag-nostic value of the 10- and 30-second Wingate test for competitive athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13:16–19.

26. Pyne DB, Boston T, Martin DT, & Logan, A. Evaluation of the lactate pro blood lactate analyser. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82:112–116. https://doi. org/10.1007/s004210050659.

27. Fox JEM, Meredith D, Halestrap AP. Characterisation of human monocarboxylate trans-porter 4 substantiates its role in lactic acid efflux from skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2000;529:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469–7793.2000.00285.x.

28. Hill DW. Energy system contributions in middle- distance running events. J Sports Sci. 1999;17:477–

483. https://doi:10.1080/026404199365786.

29. Andersen LW, Mackenhauer J, Roberts JC, Berg, KM., Cocchi, MN., & Donnino, MW. Etiology and therapeutic approach to elevated lactate levels. in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Elsevier. 2013;88:1127-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.012.

30. Palmgren PJ, Andreasson D, Eriksson M, & Hägglund, A. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibil-ity and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain—A pilot study. Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:6. https://doi:10.1186/1746-1340-17-6.

31. Fox EL, Mathews DK. The physiological basis of physical education and athletics. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1981.

32. Lehto H, Häyrinen M, Laitinen T, & Collet, K. Match Analysis and a comparison between win-ning and losing teams in men’s elite level goalball. Paper presented at: World Congress of Performance Analysis of Sport IX Programme & e-Book of Abstracts. In England, July 25-28 2012. https://doi. org/10.13140/2.1.2451.4885.

33. Morato MP, Menezes RP, Fonseca S, & Cunha Furtado OLP. Faster balls increase the probability of scoringa goal in female and male elite goalball. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte 2018;40:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbce.2018.03.027.

34. Szymanski DJ. Physiology of baseball pitching dictates specific exercise intensity for condition-ing. Strength Cond J. 2009;31:41–47. https://doi. org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e31819d34de.

35. Franchini E, Del Vecchio FB, Matsushigue KA, & Artioli, GG. Physiological profiles of elite judo athletes. Sports Med. 2011;41:147–166. https://doi. org/10.2165/11538580-000000000-00000.

36. Borkowsky L. Evaluation of the aerobic and anaero-bic fitness in judoists from the Polish national team. Biol Sport 2001;18:107–111. https://doi.org.10.2114/jpa2.26.59.

37. Bonitch-Domínguez J, Bonitch-Góngora J, Padial P, & Feriche, B. Changes in peak leg power induced by successive judo bouts and their relationship to lactate production. J Sports Sci. 2010;28:1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041 4.2010.512641.

38. Chatagnon M, Pouilly JP, Thomas V, & Busso, T. Comparison between maximal power in the power- endurance relationship and maximal instantaneous power. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94:711–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1287-y.

39. Owen G. Exploratory analysis of goalball: A regression based approach. University of Chester. England.2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10034/338910.

40. Bowerman S, Davis R, Ford S, & Nichols, D. Phases of movement of goalball throw related to ball veloc-ity. Insight 2011;4:153–159.

41. Julio UF, Panissa VL, Cury RL, Agostinho, M. F., Esteves, J. V., & Franchini, E. Energy system contributions in upper and lower body Wingate tests in highly trained athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport 2019;90:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367. 2019.1576839.

42. Charteris J. Effects of velocity on upper to lower extremity muscular work and power output ratios of intercollegiate athletes. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33:250–254. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.33.4.250.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top