Men's experience of their transition to first-time fatherhood during their partner's pregnancy: an interpretative phenomenological analysis
1Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Social Sciences, City University London, EC1V 0HB London, UK
Submitted: 13 March 2021 Accepted: 27 April 2021
Online publish date: 27 August 2021
This was a qualitative study employing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to capture the lived experiences and sense-making of seven male participants (aged 29–41), whose partner was in their second or third trimester of pregnancy. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and four superordinate themes emerged during the analysis: (1) Pushed and Pulled in Different Directions, (2) A Rollercoaster of Emotions, (3) A Long and Lonely Road and (4) Anticipating Fatherhood. The prenatal period seemed to constitute a turbulent time in the participants' lives and involved them experiencing intense, conflicting emotions and psychological states amidst a shifting sense of self, with few support resources available to them. Implications for counselling psychologists are discussed, with suggestions for future research made.
Transition to fatherhood; Expectant fathers; Father-to-be; Pregnancy; Prenatal period
Lee-Anne Meleagrou-Hitchens,Carla Willig. Men's experience of their transition to first-time fatherhood during their partner's pregnancy: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Men's Health. 2021.doi:10.31083/jomh.2021.102.
 Henwood K, Procter J. The “good father”: Reading men’s accounts of paternal involvement during the transition to first-time fatherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2003; 42: 337–355.
 White NR. About fathers: Masculinity and the social construction of fatherhood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology. 1994; 30: 119–131.
 Elliot FR. Gender, family and society. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd. 1996.
 Aldous J, Mulligan, GM, Bjarnason T. Fathering over time: What makes the difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1998; 60: 809–820.
 Glass J. Gender liberation, economic squeeze or fear of strangers: Why fathers provide infant care in dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1998; 60: 821–834.
 Fenwick J, Bayes S, Johansson M. A qualitative investigation into the pregnancy experiences and childbirth expectations of Australian fathers-to-be. Sexual & Reproductive Health Care. 2012; 3: 3–9.
 Booth A, Crouter AC. Men in families: When do they get involved?What difference does it make? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1998.
 Deutsch FM. Equally shared parenting. Current Directions in Psycho-logical Science. 2001; 10: 25–28.
 Lupton D, Barclay L. Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences. London: Sage Publications. 1997.
 Mander R. Men and Maternity. London: Routledge. 2004.
 Redshaw M, Henderson J. Fathers’ engagement in pregnancy and childbirth: Evidence from a national survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013; 13: 70–85.
 Seward RR, Richter R. International research on fathering: an expanding horizon. Fathering. 2008; 6: 87–91.
 Lamb ME. The role of the father in child development. 3rd edn. New York: Wiley. 1997.
 Lamb ME, Pleck JH, Charnov EL, Levine JA. A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In Lanaster JB, Altmann J, Rossi AS, Sherrod LR (eds.) Parenting across the lifespan: Biosocial perspectives (pp. 111–142). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine. 1997.
 Pruett KD. Role of the father. Pediatrics. 1998; 102: 1253–1261.
 Connell RW. The Men and the Boys. Cambridge: Polity. 2020.
 Morgan DHJ. Epilogue. In: Hobson B. (ed.) Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002.
 Lamb ME. The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley. 1976.
 Strauss R, Goldberg WA. Self and possible selves during the transition to fatherhood. Journal of Family Psychology. 1999; 13: 244–259.
 Kralik D, Visentin K, Van Loon A. Transition: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006; 55: 320–329.
 Daiches A, Hall P, Chin R. A qualitative exploration of first-time fathers’ experiences of becoming a father. Community Practitioner. 2011; 24: 19–23.
 Doucet A. Gender Equality and Gender Differences: Parenting, Habitus and Embodiment. Canadian Review of Sociology. 2009; 48: 99–117.
 Draper J. It’s the first scientific evidence: Men’s experience of pregnancy confirmation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002; 39: 563–570.
 Draper J. Men’s passage to fatherhood: An analysis of the contempo-rary relevance of transition theory. Nursing Inquiry. 2003; 10: 66–78.
 Genesoni L, Tallandini MA. Men’s psychological transition to father-hood: an analysis of the literature, 1989–2008. Birth. 2009; 36: 305–318.
 Miller T. Making Sense of Fatherhood: Gender, Caring and Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011.
 Fletcher R, Mathey S, Marley C. Addressing depression and anxiety among new fathers. Medical Journal of Australia. 2006; 18: 461–466.
 Donovan J. The process of analysis during a grounded theory study of men during their partners’ pregnancies. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995; 21: 708–715.
 Finnbogadottir H, Svalenius EC, Persson, EK. Expectant first-time fathers’ experiences of pregnancy. Midwifery. 2003; 19, 96–105.
 Paulson JF, Bazemore SD. Prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers and its association with maternal depression: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010; 303: 1961–1969.
 Boyce P, Condon J, Barton J, Corkindale C. First-Time Fathers’ Study: psychological distress in expectant fathers during pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2007; 41; 718–725.
 Buist A, Morse C, Durking S. Men’s adjustment to fatherhood: Impli-cations for obstetric health care. Journal of Obstetric Gynaecological and Neonatal Nursing. 2002; 32: 172–180.
 Condon JT, Boyce P, Corkindale CJ. The first-time fathers study: A prospective study of the mental health and wellbeing of men during the transition to fatherhood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2004; 38: 56–64.
 Kowlessar O, Fox JR, Wittkowski A. The pregnant male: a metasynthesis of first-time fathers’ experiences of pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2015; 33: 106–127.
 Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health. 1997; 20: 365–371.
 Barclay L, Donovan J, Genovese A. Men’s experiences during their partner’s first pregnancy: A grounded theory analysis. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996; 13; 13–25.
 Kao CH, Long A. First-time Taiwanese expectant fathers’ life expe-riences during the third trimester of pregnancy. Journal of Nursing Research. 2004; 12: 60–70.
 May KA. Three phases of father involvement in pregnancy. Nursing Research. 1982; 31: 337–342.
 Burgess A, Goldman R. Who’s the bloke in the room? Fathers during pregnancy and at the birth in the United Kingdom. Contemporary Fathers in the UK Series. Marlborough: Fatherhood Institute. 2018.
 Deave T, Johnson D. The transition to parenthood: What does it mean to fathers? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 63: 626–633.
 The Fatherhood Institute & Fathers Network Scotland. How was it for you? Online Survey. 2018. Available at: https://data. surveygizmo.com/r/74284_5b1536432c9704.07266869 (Ac-cessed: 15 August 2020).
 Machin AJ. Mind the Gap: The expectation and reality of involved fatherhood. Fathering. 2015; 13: 36–59.
 Amato PR. Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology. 2001; 15: 355–370.
 Ramchandani P, Stein A, Evans J, O’Connor TG. Paternal depression in the postnatal period and child development: a prospective population study. Lancet. 2005; 365: 2201–2205.
 Ramchandani PG, Stein A, O’Connor TG, Heron J, Murray L, Evans J. Depression in men in the postnatal period and later child psychopathology: A population cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2008; 47: 390–398.
 Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: SAGE Publications. 2009.
 Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. UK: McGraw-Hill Education. 2013.
 Browning D. Feminism, family, and women’s rights: A hermeneutic realist perspective. Zygon. 2003; 38: 317–332.
 Slife BD, Christensen TR. Hermeneutic realism: Toward a truly meaningful psychology. Review of General Psychology. 2013; 17: 230.
 Yardley L. Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In JA Smith (ed.) Qualitative Psychology (pp. 235–251). 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications. 2008.
 Gage J, Kirk R. First-time fathers: perceptions of preparedness for fatherhood. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2002; 34: 15–24.
 Brennan A, Marshall-Lucette S, Ayers S, Ahmed H. A qualitative exploration of the Couvade syndrome in expectant fathers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2007; 25: 18–39.
 Ferketich SL, Mercer RT. Predictors of role competence for experi-enced and inexperienced fathers. Nursing Research. 1995; 44: 89–95.
 Chandler S, Field PA. Becoming a father: First-time fathers’ experience of labour and delivery. Journal of Nurse Midwifery. 1997; 42: 17–24.
 Jordan PL. Laboring for relevance: expectant and new fatherhood. Nursing Research. 1990; 39: 11–16.
 Darwin Z, Galdas, P, Hinchliff S, Littlewood E, McMillan D, McGowan L, et al. Fathers’ views and experiences of their own mental health during pregnancy and the first postnatal year: a qualitative interview study of men participating in the UK Born and Bred in Yorkshire (BaBY) cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17: 1–45.
 Fletcher R, May C, St George J, Stoker L, Oshan M. Engaging fathers: Evidence review. Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth. 2014.
 Alio AP, Lewis CA, Scarborough K, Harris K, Fiscella K. A community perspective on the role of fathers during pregnancy: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 60–71.
 Arnett JJ. The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist. 2008; 65: 602–614.
Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.
Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.