Article Data

  • Views 602
  • Dowloads 202

Systematic review

Open Access

Exploring the knowledge structure of Korean physical activity research using topic modeling and keyword network analysis

  • So-Eun Lee1
  • Hye-Ryeon Kim2
  • Chang-Hwan Choi3

1Department of Physical Education, Gachon University, 13120 Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

2Department of Dance Education, Dongguk University, 04620 Seoul, Republic of Korea

3Department of Physical Education, Kangwon National University, 24341 Kangwon-do, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.084 Vol.17,Issue 4,September 2021 pp.37-43

Submitted: 17 May 2021 Accepted: 26 July 2021

Published: 30 September 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Hye-Ryeon Kim E-mail:
*Corresponding Author(s): Chang-Hwan Choi E-mail:

PDF (1,013.08 kB)


Background and purpose: Information on topics and knowledge structures is an important indicator of trends, prospects and sustainability in research fields. Although many studies on physical activity (PA) have been published in Korea, no studies have been reported to explain knowledge structure (KS) and keyword topics. Therefore, this study intends to analyze and explain PA-related studies.

Research method: In this study, topic modeling and keyword network analysis were applied to explore the KS of domestic PA-related studies published in domestic journals. 83 journals and 782 studies published from 1996 to June 2019 were collected, and 5441 key research keywords were used as data.

Results and conclusions: Analyzing the study of physical activity in Korea, first, it is a study that reports the PA level of students from an educational point of view. Second, it is a study that verified the validity and reliability of the measurement tool. Third, a study reporting the psychological and behavioral characteristics of PA participants. Fourth, studies promoting PA participation in subjects with disabilities. Fifth, research on key topics of health and obesity is ongoing. This study can be used as basic data to explore the current status of global PA research by providing information on major themes, keywords, and trends of domestic PA research.


Knowledge structure; Research trends; South Korea; Physical activity; Network analysis; Topic modeling

Cite and Share

So-Eun Lee, Hye-Ryeon Kim,Chang-Hwan Choi. Exploring the knowledge structure of Korean physical activity research using topic modeling and keyword network analysis. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(4);37-43.


[1] Haskell WL, Blair SN, Hill JO. Physical activity: Health outcomes and importance for public health policy. Preventive Medicine. 2009; 49: 280–282.

[2] Chae JS, So WY. Analysis of trends in physique and physical fitness in Korean adults. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 50–58.

[3] Graf S, Cecchini M. Diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviors: Analysis of trends, inequalities and clustering in selected OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers. 2017; 100: 1–94.


[5] World Health Organization (WHO). 2020. Available at: physicalactivity (Accessed: 15 July 2020).

[6] Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katz-marzyk PT, van Mechelen W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016; 388: 1311–1324.

[7] Friedenreich CM, McNeil J. Mapping the historical development of research in physical activity and health: Providing a platform for future research. Preventive Medicine. 2018; 111: 473–475.

[8] Eichenbaum LR, Kao MCJ, Tomkins‐Lane C, Smuck M. Poster 269 Rapidly Increasing Trends in Physical Activity Research within the Published Medical Literature. PM&R. 2014; 6: S279–S279.

[9] Blair SN, Powell KE. The Evolution of the Physical Activity Field. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2014; 85: 9–12.

[10] Varela AR, Pratt M, Harris J, Lecy J, Salvo D, Brownson RC, et al. Mapping the historical development of physical activity and health research: a structured literature review and citation network analysis. Preventive Medicine. 2018; 111: 466–472.

[11] Gowing M. Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. The British Journal for the History of Science. 1974; 7: 72–75.

[12] Galunic DC, Rodan S. Resource recombinations in the firm: knowl-edge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal. 1998; 19: 1193–1201.

[13] Aviv R, Erlich Z, Ravid G, and Geva A. Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2003; 7: 1–23.

[14] Zhang J, Xie J, Hou W, Tu X, Xu J, Song F, et al. Mapping the knowledge structure of research on patient adherence: knowledge domain visualization based co-word analysis and social network analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e34497.

[15] Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International. 1992; 13: 313–321.

[16] De Wever B, Schellens T, Valcke M, Van Keer H. Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Computers & Education. 2006; 46: 6–28.

[17] Strijbos J, Stahl G. Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication. Learning and Instruction. 2007; 17: 394–404.

[18] Krätke S. Regional Knowledge Networks. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2010; 17: 83–97.

[19] Li W, Zhao Y. Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assess-ment research in a 20-year period. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2015; 50: 158–166.

[20] Mâsse LC, O’Connor TM, Tu AW, Hughes SO, Beauchamp MR, Baranowski T. Conceptualizing physical activity parenting practices using expert informed concept mapping analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17: 574.

[21] Blei DM. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM. 2012; 55: 77–84.

[22] Steyvers M, Griffiths T. Probabilistic topic models. In Landauer TK, McNamara DS, Dennis S, Kintsch W (eds.) Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 424–440). 1st edn. New York: Psychology Press. 2007.

[23] Amado A, Cortez P, Rita P, Moro S. Research trends on Big Data in Marketing: a text mining and topic modeling based literature analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2018; 24: 1–7.

[24] Harris JK, Lecy J, Hipp JA, Brownson RC, Parra DC. Mapping the development of research on physical activity and the built environment. Preventive Medicine. 2013; 57: 533–540.

[25] Herman KM, Ardern CI, Mason C, Brien SE, Katzmarzyk PT. Trends in physical activity research in Canada. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2007; 32: 400–408.

[26] Mabry R, Koohsari MJ, Bull F, Owen N. A systematic review of physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in the oil-producing countries of the Arabian Peninsula. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 1003.

[27] HARADA K, SHIBATA A, NAKAMURA Y. Trends of Recent Research on Physical Activity and Environment. Journal of Japan Society of Sports Industry. 2011; 21: 1–7.

[28] Graf S, Cecchini M. Diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviours: Analysis of trends, inequalities and clustering in selected OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers (pp. 1–94). Paris: OECD Publishing. 2017.

[29] Ryu M, Jo J, Lee Y, Chung Y, Kim K, Baek W. Association of physical activity with sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older adults: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Age and Ageing. 2013; 42: 734–740.

[30] Han MA, Kim KS, Park J, Kang MG, Ryu SY. Association between levels of physical activity and poor self-rated health in Korean adults: The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2005. Public Health. 2009 ;123: 665–669.

[31] Cho M. The Strength of Motivation and Physical Activity Level during Leisure Time among Youth in South Korea. Youth & Society. 2004; 35: 480–494.

[32] Park HW, Leydesdorff L. Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2004; 6: 1377–1387.

[33] Koo K, Kim C, Park C, Byeun J, Seo G. Restrictions of physical activity participation in older adults with disability: employing keyword network analysis. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. 2016; 12: 373-378.

[34] An JY, Tak YR. Developing an instrument to evaluate physical activity level of children in large populations: a preliminary study. Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. 2010; 27: 1–14.

[35] Park KW, Lee MY. Calibration and Validity Evidences of OMNI Chil-dren’s Perceived Exertion Scales. the Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science. 2014; 16: 97–108.

[36] Hong JY, Han SH. A Study on the Validity of an Ecological Teaching Assessment Tool to Promote the Physical Activities of Children Who Have Visual Impairment with Other Disabilities in Physical Education. Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice. 2008; 9: 195–213. (In Korean)

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time