Speciﬁc warm-up enhances movement velocity during bench press and squat resistance training
1Department of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200 Covilhã, Portugal
2Department of Science and Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, 2900 Setubal, Portugal
3Department of Arts, Humanities and Sport, Polytechnic Institute of Beja (IPBeja), 7800-316 Beja, Portugal
4Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, 6200-151 Covilhã, Portugal
DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.069 Vol.17,Issue 4,September 2021 pp.226-233
Submitted: 16 April 2021 Accepted: 18 May 2021
Published: 30 September 2021
Background and objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of speciﬁc warm-up on squat and bench press resistance training.
Methods: Thirty-four resistance-trained males (23.53 ± 2.35 years) participated in the current study. Among these, 12 were evaluated in the squat and 22 in the bench press. After determining the maximal strength load (1RM), each participant performed a training set (3 × 6 repetitions) with 80%1RM (training load) after completing a speciﬁc warm-up and without warming up, in random order. The warm-up comprised 2 × 6 repetitions with 40% and 80% of the training load, respectively. Mean propulsive velocity, velocity loss, peak velocity, mechanical power, work, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion were assessed.
Results: The results showed that after the warm-up, the participants were able to perform the squat and bench press at a higher mean propulsive velocity in the ﬁrst set (squat: 0.68 ± 0.05 vs. 0.64 ± 0.06 m·s−1, p = 0.009, ES = 0.91; bench press: 0.52 ± 0.06 vs. 0.47 ± 0.08 m·s−1, p = 0.02, ES = 0.56). The warm-up positively inﬂuenced the peak velocity (1.32 ± 0.12 vs. 1.20 ± 0.11 m·s−1, p = 0.001, ES = 1.23) and the time to reach peak velocity (593.75 ± 117.01 vs. 653.58 ± 156.53 ms, p = 0.009, ES = 0.91) during the squat set.
Conclusion: The speciﬁc warm-up seems to enhance neuromuscular actions that enable a higher movement velocity during the ﬁrst training repetitions and to allow greater peak velocities in less time.
Power; Pre-exercise; Strength; Velocity; Work
Bruno Ribeiro,Ana Pereira,Ana R. Alves,Pedro P. Neves,Mário C. Marques,Daniel A. Marinho,Henrique P. Neiva. Speciﬁc warm-up enhances movement velocity during bench press and squat resistance training. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(4);226-233.
 McGowan CJ, Pyne DB, Thompson KG Rattray B. Warm-up strategies for sport and exercise: mechanisms and applications. Sports Medicine. 2015; 45: 1523–1546.
 Bishop D. Warm up II: performance changes following active warm up and how to structure the warm up. Sports Medicine. 2003; 33: 483–498.
 Bishop D. Warm up I: potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports Medicine. 2003; 33: 439–454.
 Dalrymple KJ, Davis SE, Dwyer, GB, Moir, GL. Effect of static and dynamic stretching on vertical jump performance in collegiate women volleyball players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010; 24: 149–155.
 Holt BW, Lambourne K. The impact of different warm-up protocols on vertical jump performance in male collegiate athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2008; 22: 226–229.
 Montalvo S., Dorgo S. The effect of different stretching protocols on vertical jump measures in college age gymnasts. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019; 59: 1956–1962.
 Pojskić H., Pagaduan JC, Babajić F, Užičanin E, Muratović M, Tomljanović M. Acute effects of prolonged intermittent low-intensity isometric warm-up schemes on jump, sprint, and agility performance in collegiate soccer players. Biology of Sport. 2015; 32: 129–134.
 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2004; 36: 674–688.
 Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Medicine. 2016; 46: 1419–1449.
 Gil MH, Neiva HP, Sousa AC, Marques MC, Marinho DA. Current approaches on warming up for sports performance: A critical review. Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2019; 41: 70–79.
 Barroso R., Batista C., Tricoli V., Roschel H., Ugrinowitsch C. The effects of different intensities and durations of the general warm-up on leg-press 1RM. Journal of Strength and Condition Research. 2013; 27: 1009–1013.
 Gallo R, Mello W. Efeitos agudos de diferentes estratégias de aquecimento sobre o desempenho de repetições máximas no exercício de supino reto em homens adultos-jovens. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2017; 11: 447–452.
 Ribeiro SA, Marcelo M, Brad SJ, Mariana SF, Ademar A, Edilson CS. Effect of different warm-up procedures on the performance of resistance training exercises. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2014; 119: 133–145.
 Krzysztofik M., Wilk M., Filip A., Zmijewski P., Zajac A., Tufano J.J. Can Post-Activation Performance Enhancement (PAPE) Improve Resistance Training Volume during the Bench Press Exercise?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 2554.
 Krzysztofik M., Wilk M., Stastny P., Goals A. Post-activation Performance Enhancement in the Bench Press Throw: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021; 11: 598628.
 Blazevich A.J., Babault N. Post-activation Potentiation Versus Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Humans: Historical Per-spective, Underlying Mechanisms, and Current Issues. Frontiers in Physiology. 2020; 10: 1359.
 Wilcox J, Larson R, Brochu K, Falgenbaum A. Acute Explosive-Force Movements Enhance Bench-Press Performance in Athletic Men. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2006; 1: 261–269.
 Junior D, Junor A, Serpa É, Gomes W, Soares E, Lopes C, et al.. Different warm-ups on the maximum repetition performance in resistance training. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2014; 20: 461–464.
 Ribeiro B, Pereira A, Neves PP, Sousa AC, Ferraz R, Marques MC, et al. The Role of Specific Warm-up during Bench Press and Squat Exercises: A Novel Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 6882.
 Abad CC, Prado ML, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, Barroso R. Combination of general and specific warm-ups improves leg-press one repetition maximum compared with specific warm-up in trained individuals. Journal Strength and Condition Research. 2011; 25: 2242–2245.
 González-Badillo JJ, Marques MC, Sánchez-Medina L. The impor-tance of movement velocity as a measure to control resistance training intensity. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2011; 29: 15–19.
 González-Badillo JJ, Sánchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010; 31: 347–352.
 Jovanović M, Flanagan EP. Researched applications of velocity based strength training. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning. 2014; 22: 58–69.
 Sánchez-Medina L. González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011; 43: 1725–1734.
 Sánchez-Medina L, Pallarés JG, Pérez CE, Morán-Navarro R, González-Badillo JJ. Estimation of relative load from bar velocity in the full back squat exercise. Sports Medicine International Open. 2017; 1: E80–E88.
 Pallarés JG, Sánchez-Medina L, Pérez CE, Cruz-Sánchez E, Mora-Rodriguez R. Imposing a pause between the eccentric and concentric phases increases the reliability of isoinertial strength assessments. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2014; 32: 1165–1175.
 Adams K. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2002; 34: 364–380.
 Sousa AC, Marinho DA, Gil MH, Izquierdo M, Rodriguez-Rosell D, Neiva HP, et al. Concurrent training followed by detraining: does the resistance training intensity matter? Journal Strength and Condition Research. 2018; 32: 632–642.
 García-Ramos A, Pestaña-Melero FL, Pérez-Castilla A, Rojas FJ, Haff GG. Mean velocity vs. mean propulsive velocity vs. peak velocity: which variable determines bench press relative load with higher reliability? Journal Strength and Condition Research. 2018; 32: 1273–1279.
 Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics: Champaign IL USA. 1998.
 Hopkins MG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2009; 41: 3–12.
 Slawinski J, Bonnefoy A, Levêque JM, Ontanon G, Riquet A, Dumas R, et al. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of elite and well-trained sprinters during sprint start. Journal Strength and Condition Research. 2010; 24: 896–905.
 McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. The role of rate of force development on vertical jump performance. Journal Strength and Condition Research. 2011; 25: 379–385.
 Stone MH, Sands WA, Carlock J, Callan S, Dickie D, Daigle K, et al. The importance of isometric maximum strength and peak rate-of-force development in sprint cycling. Journal Strength and Condition Research. 2014; 18: 878–884.
 Arabatzi F, Patikas D, Zafeiridis A, Giavroudis K, Kannas T, Gourgoulis V, et al. The post-activation potentiation effect on squat jump performance: Age and sex effect. Pediatric Exercise Science.2014; 26: 187–194.
 Gołaś A, Maszczyk A, Zajac A, Mikołajec K, Stastny P. Optimizing post activation potentiation for explosive activities in competitive sports. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2016; 52: 95–106.
 Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D. Post-activation potentiation. Sports Medicine. 2005; 35: 585–595.
 Tod D, Edwards C, McGuigan M, Lovell G. A systematic review of the effect of cognitive strategies on strength performance. Sports Medicine. 2015; 45: 1589–1602.
Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.
Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.