Article Data

  • Views 1421
  • Dowloads 207

Original Research

Open Access

Expert consensus statement to guide research into evidence-based classification of athletes for Para-Taekwondo -- A Delphi study

  • Hee Seong Jeong1,2
  • David M. O’Sullivan3
  • Primoz R. Rus4
  • Ashanti Ramírez Montes de Oca5

1Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

2International Olympic Committee Research Centre KOREA, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3Division of Sports Science, Pusan National University, Republic of Korea

4World Taekwondo, Slovenia

5National University of Sport Trainers ENED, Mexico

DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.019 Vol.17,Issue 2,April 2021 pp.114-119

Published: 08 April 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): David M. O’Sullivan E-mail:

PDF (103.09 kB) Supplementary material


Background and Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate various issues surrounding participation in Para-Taekwondo Kyorugi (sparring), with the aim of focusing on future research initiatives to improve the classification system and safety for participation in Para-Taekwondo.

Material and Methods: For this, a series of online questionnaires and in-person round-table discussions were conducted prior to the World Para-Taekwondo Championships (Antalya, Turkey, 2019), with a final online questionnaire thereafter. A select group of experts, such as athletes, coaches, administrators, classifiers, and athletes were invited to partake, with the main outcome measures being the expert opinions and ranking of importance for research into issues affecting Para Taekwondo athletes.

Results: The results of the discuss provide suggestions and opinions for the following areas are provided for the aim of classification, minimum impairment criteria, fairness of classes, combination of classes, competition time, mixing of different impairments, safety of cerebral palsy athletes, weight classes, gender differences, intentional misrepresentation, personal protectors, time for re-classification, and research priorities.

Conclusion: The most prevalent issue highlighted was the concern for athlete safety, especially for the K44 class, which has a mixture of neurological impairments, i.e. an athlete with mild cerebral palsy (CP) competing against an athlete with an amputation. Furthermore, on the issue of safety, developing protectors for athletes was another key issue raised. Therefore, in the future, we can strongly recommend research initiatives to examine the safety of athletes with various impairment types in the same class, and the development of protectors for Para Taekwondo athletes.


Classification; Safety; Injury prevention; Paralympics; Para-Taekwondo

Cite and Share

Hee Seong Jeong,David M. O’Sullivan,Primoz R. Rus,Ashanti Ramírez Montes de Oca. Expert consensus statement to guide research into evidence-based classification of athletes for Para-Taekwondo -- A Delphi study. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(2);114-119.


[1] World Taekwondo. Para Taekwondo. 2019. Available at: http://www. (Accessed: July 20, 2019).

[2] Paralympic Sports Taekwondo. Histroy of Para Taekwondo. 2019. Available at: July 20, 2019)

[3] Tokyo 2020. Paralympic Sports Taekwondo. 2019. Available at: https: //

(Accessed: August 25, 2019)

[4] Hansson O. Para Taekwondo: from vision to paralympic inclusion (and beyond). in: international symposium for taekwondo studies (pp. 25-26). International Symposium for Taekwondo. 2017.

[5] O’Sullivan D, Fife GP. Biomechanical performance factors for develop-ment of minimum disability requirements in para-taekwondo-Part 1. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine. 2015; 11: 63-69.

[6] Vanlandewijck Y, Thompson W. Handbook of sports medicine and science, the paralympic athlete. John Wiley & Sons. 2011.

[7] Paralympics. Registration opens for sixth WTF World Para-Taekwondo Championships. 2019. Available at: https://www.paralympic. org/news/registration-opens-sixth-wtf-world-para-taekwondo-championships. (Accessed: July 31, 2019)

[8] Tweedy SM, Vanlandewijck YC. International Paralympic Committee position stand-background and scientific principles of classification in Paralympic sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011; 45: 259-269.

[9] International Paralympic Committee. IPC Classification Code and Inter-national Standards. 2007.

[10] World Para Taekwondo. Athlete Classification Rules as of January 1st 2018. Available at: (Accessed: July 21, 2019)

[11] Fife GP, O’Sullivan DM, Lee SY. Injury incidence and severity at the 5th World Para-taekwondo Championships. The Journal of Kinesiology. 2017; 19: 45-53.

[12] Bešlija T, Čular D, Kezić A, Tomljanović M, Ardigò LP, Dhabhi W, et al. Height-based model for the categorization of athletes in combat sports. European Journal of Sport Science. 2020; 8: 1-25.

[13] Kinoshita M, Fujii N. How to deal with rotation in Para-Taekwondo. ISBS Proceedings Archive. 2017; 35: 863-866.

[14] Ravensbergen HR, Mann DL, Kamper SJ. Expert consensus statement to guide the evidence-based classification of Paralympic athletes with vision impairment: a Delphi study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016; 50: 386- 391.

[15] Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 2007; 6: 1-21.

[16] Turoff M, Linstone HA. The Delphi method. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc. 1975.

[17] Bae YS. Relationship between the impact value of electronic body protector and the impact force of force platform in the Taekwondo. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2013; 23: 125-130.

[18] Umphred DA, Lazaro RT. Neurological rehabilitation. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2012.

[19] Beckman EM, Tweedy SM. Towards evidence-based classification in Paralympic athletics: evaluating the validity of activity limitation tests for use in classification of Paralympic running events. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009; 43: 1067-1072.

[20] Jeong HS, O’Sullivan DM, Lee SC, Lee SY. Safety evaluation of protective equipment for the forearm, shin, hand and foot in taekwondo. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2019; 18: 376-383.

[21] World Taekwondo. World Taekwondo Forum held to discuss taekwondo’s global development. 2020. Available at: http: // 124325&sc=ph&w=para%20taekwondo. (Accessed: October 29, 2020)

[22] World Para-Taekwondo. Athlete classification rules. 2020. Available at: srhrst.html?w=para%20taekwondo. (Accessed: November 01, 2020).

[23] Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information management. 2004; 42: 15-29.

[24] Wąsik J, Wójcik A. Health in the context of martial arts practice. Physical Activity Review. 2017; 5: 91-94.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time