Ligation-free single scrotal incision orchiectomy with ultrasonic scalpel: Xinhua Zhang Procedure
1Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 430071 Wuhan, P. R. China
DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.010 Vol.17,Issue 3,July 2021 pp.88-90
Submitted: 20 November 2020 Accepted: 24 December 2020
Published: 08 July 2021
Background: To explore the eﬃcacy and safety of a new type of testicular excision with ultrasonic dissector.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 69 patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing orchiectomy in our hospital between June 2017 and June 2019. All patients were divided into a traditional surgery group (n = 27) and an ultrasonic scalpel surgery group (n = 42). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rates were compared.
Results: The ultrasonic scalpel surgery group had signiﬁcantly shorter operation times and less intraoperative blood loss than the traditional surgery group (each P < 0.01). Moreover, the incidence of postoperative complication differed signiﬁcantly between the traditional surgery group (18.52%) and the ultrasonic scalpel surgery group (0%) (P < 0.01). However, there was no signiﬁcant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: The surgery time for testicular excision using the ultrasonic knife is short, the operation is simple and the complications are few and thus it may become a form of replacement for traditional testicular excision.
Ultracision; Orchiectomy; Novel procedure
Yan Li,Dao-Quan Liu,Hassan Mkoko Hassan,Xing-Huan Wang,Xin-Hua Zhang. Ligation-free single scrotal incision orchiectomy with ultrasonic scalpel: Xinhua Zhang Procedure. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(3);88-90.
 Srivatsav A, Balasubramanian A, Butaney M, Thirumavalavan N, McBride JA, Gondokusumo J, et al. Patient attitudes toward testicular prosthesis placement after orchiectomy. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2019; 13: 155798831986101.
 Dowling CM, Assel M, Musser JE, Meeks JJ, Sjoberg DD, Bosl G, et al. Clinical outcome of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy in patients with pure embryonal carcinoma in the orchiectomy specimen. Urology. 2018; 114: 133-138.
 Paffenholz P, Pfister D, Heidenreich A. Postchemotherapy residual tumour resection in complex metastatic sites of advanced testicular germ cell tumours. Urologe-Ausgabe A. 2016; 55: 632-640.
 Hicks N, Gupta S. Complications and risk factors in elective benign scrotal surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2016; 50: 468-471.
 Jiang J, Shen M, Lu H. Ultrasonic scalpel with knot tying protects parathyroid function for total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection. Gland Surgery. 2020; 9: 192-199.
 Morino M, Rimonda R, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Garrone C. Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery. 2005; 242: 897-901.
 Salami A, Dellepiane M, Bavazzano M, Crippa B, Mora F, Mora R. New trends in head and neck surgery: a prospective evaluation of the Harmonic Scalpel. Medical Science Monitor. 2008; 14: PI1-PI5.
 Caronia FP, Arrigo E, Trovato S, Lo Monte AI, Cottone S, Sgalambro F, et al. Uniportal bilateral video-assisted sequential thoracoscopic extended thymectomy. Journal of Visualized Surgery. 2017; 3: 69.
 Bapat S, Mahajan PM, Bhave AA, Kshirsagar YB, Sovani YB, Mulay A. Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate. The Indian Journal of Surgery. 2011; 73: 175-177.
 Selvi I, Basar H. Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychoso-cial effects. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020; 28: 4313-4326.
Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.
Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.