A Comparative Study on the Effect of Self-Determined Motivation of Generation Z on Their Exercise Adherence Intention According to Their Satisfaction with Body Image and Gender

: Generation Z is accustomed to using social media to expose themselves to others. Due to the characteristics of this generation, the intention to continue exercise differs depending on the satisfaction with one’s body image.

: This study analyzed (a) the effect of Generation Z’s self-determined motivation to exercise on their exercise adherence intention and (b) the moderating effect of satisfaction with body image and gender between self-determined motivation and exercise adherence intention. Data from 451 Generation Z (born during 1995–2010) university students in Republic of Korea were analyzed on self-determined motivation and exercise adherence intention by structural equation modeling (SEM).

: The effect of self-determined motivation on exercise adherence intention showed that external regulation had a significant negative effect on exercise adherence intention. In contrast, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation had a significant positive effect on exercise adherence intention. Moreover, this study compared the differences between the four classified groups according to the gap between perceived and ideal body images, level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the body image, and gender. The comparison results indicated that external regulation had a significant negative effect on exercise adherence intention in all groups. In the group of men who were satisfied with their body image, intrinsic motivation had a positive effect on their exercise adherence intention.

: Based on the analysis results, Generation Z’s exercise adherence intention was more affected by internal satisfaction rather than external motivations. It is significance lies in the fact that it focused on Generation Z, who will be the future leading consumers.

ect on exercise adherence intention in all groups. In the group of men who were satisfied with their body image, intrinsic motivation had a positive effect on their exercise adherence intention. Conclusions: Based on the analysis results, Generation Z’s exercise adherence intention was more affected by internal satisfaction rather than external motivations. It is significance lies in the fact that it focused on Generation Z, who will be the future leading consumers.

[1] Lup K, Trub L, Rosenthal L. Instagram# Instasad?: Explor-ing Associations among Instagram Use, Depressive Symp-toms, Negative Social Comparison, and Strangers Followed. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2015; 18: 247–252.

[2] Verdina Z. A picture is worth a thousand words: Storytelling with Instagram [Doctoral dissertation]. Universiteit Antwerpen. 2013.

[3] Fox J, Vendemia MA. Selective Self-Presentation and Social Comparison through Photographs on Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2016; 19: 593–600.

[4] Brown Z, Tiggemann M. Attractive celebrity and peer images on Instagram: Effect on women’s mood and body image. Body Image. 2016; 19: 37–43.

[5] Robinson TR. Clothing behavior, body cathexis, and appearance management of women enrolled in a commercial weight loss program [Dissertation]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 2003.

[6] Tylka TL, Kroon Van Diest AM. The Intuitive Eating Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation with college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2013; 60: 137–153.

[7] Cash TF, Smolak L. Body Image: A Handbook of Science, Prac-tice, and Prevention. Guilford Press: New York. 2011.

[8] Cash TF. Cognitive-Behavioral Perspectives on Body Image. El-sevier Academic Press: Cambridge. 2012.

[9] Fallon EA, Harris BS, Johnson P. Prevalence of body dissatis-faction among a United States adult sample. Eating Behaviors. 2014; 15: 151–158.

[10] Vani MF, Murray RM, Sabiston CM. Body image and physical activity. Essentials of Exercise and Sport Psychology: An Open Access Textbook. 2021; 150–175.

[11] Sonstroem RJ, Morgan WP. Exercise and self-esteem: Rationale and model. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1989; 21: 329–337.

[12] Buckworth J, Dishman RK, Tomporowski PD. Exercise psy-chology. Human Kinetics: Champaign. 2013.

[13] Hausenblas HA, Downs DS. Comparison of Body Image be-tween Athletes and Nonathletes: a Meta-Analytic Review. Jour-nal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2001; 13: 323–339.

[14] Hausenblas HA, Fallon EA. Exercise and body image: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Health. 2006; 21: 33–47.

[15] Campbell A, Hausenblas HA. Effects of Exercise Interventions on Body Image: A meta-analysis. Journal of Health Psychology. 2009; 14: 780–793.

[16] Markland D. The mediating role of behavioural regulations in the relationship between perceived body size discrepancies and physical activity among adult women. Hellenic Journal of Psy-chology. 2009; 6: 169–182.

[17] Bessenoff GR, Snow D. Absorbing Society’s Influence: Body Image Self-Discrepancy and Internalized Shame. Sex Roles. 2006; 54: 727–731.

[18] Homan KJ, Tylka TL. Appearance-based exercise motivation moderates the relationship between exercise frequency and pos-itive body image. Body Image. 2014; 11: 101–108.

[19] Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of phys-ical activity: the evidence. Canadian Medical Association Jour-nal. 2006; 174: 801–809.

[20] Higgins ET. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review. 1987; 94: 319–340.

[21] Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NL. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Human Kinetics: Cham-paign. 2007.

[22] Burton TL, Jackson EL. Leisure research and the social sci-ences: an exploratory study of active researchers. Leisure Stud-ies. 1989; 8: 263–280.

[23] Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psycho-logical Inquiry. 2000; 11: 227–268.

[24] Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Clas-sic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000; 25: 54–67.

[25] Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. Guilford Publications: New York. 2018.

[26] Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Ex-ercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a sys-tematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012; 9: 78.

[27] Wilson PM, Rodgers WM, Blanchard CM, Gessell J. The rela-tionship between psychological needs, self-determined motiva-tion, exercise attitudes, and physical fitness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2003; 33: 2373–2392.

[28] Culiberg B, Mihelič KK. Three ethical frames of reference: in-sights into Millennials’ ethical judgements and intentions in the workplace. Business Ethics: a European Review. 2016; 25: 94–111.

[29] Hershatter A, Epstein M. Millennials and the World of Work: an Organization and Management Perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2010; 25: 211–223.

[30] Rodin J. Cultural and Psychosocial Determinants of Weight Concerns. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1993; 119: 643–645.

[31] Steiger H, Fraenkel L, Leichner PP. Relationship of body-image distortion to sex-role identifications, irrational cognitions, and body weight in eating-disordered females. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1989; 45: 61–65.

[32] Markland D, Tobin V. A Modification to the Behavioural Reg-ulation in Exercise Questionnaire to Include an Assessment of Amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2004; 26: 191–196.

[33] Bhattacherjee A. Understanding Information Systems Contin-uance: an Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly. 2001; 25: 351–370.

[34] West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural Equation Models with Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies Sage Publica-tions: Thousand Oaks. 1995.

[35] Kline RB. Software Review: Software Programs for Structural Equation Modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psy-choeducational Assessment. 1998; 16: 343–364.

[36] Kassim NLA, Daud NM, Daud NSM. Interaction between writ-ing apprehension, motivation, attitude and writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. World Applied Sci-ences Journal. 2013; 21: 102–108.

[37] MacCallum RC, Roznowski M, Mar CM, Reith JV. Alternative Strategies for Cross-Validation of Covariance Structure Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1994; 29: 1–32.

[38] Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Facto-rial Validity of a Measuring Instrument. International Journal of Testing. 2001; 1: 55–86.

[39] Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Per-sonality. 1985; 19: 109–134.

[40] Schaefer J, Vella SA, Allen MS, Magee CA. Competition Anx-iety, Motivation, and Mental Toughness in Golf. Journal of Ap-plied Sport Psychology. 2016; 28: 309–320.

[41] Lauderdale ME, Yli-Piipari S, Irwin CC, Layne TE. Gender Differences Regarding Motivation for Physical Activity among College Students: A Self-Determination Approach. The Physi-cal Educator. 2015; 72: 153–172.

[42] Sattler KM, Deane FP, Tapsell L, Kelly PJ. Gender differences in the relationship of weight-based stigmatisation with motiva-tion to exercise and physical activity in overweight individuals. Health Psychology Open. 2018; 5: 2055102918759691.

[43] Kilpatrick M, Hebert E, Bartholomew J. College Students’ Motivation for Physical Activity: Differentiating Men’s and Women’s Motives for Sport Participation and Exercise. Journal of American College Health. 2005; 54: 87–94.

[44] Leng HK, Phua YXP, Yang Y. Body Image, Physical Activity and Sport Involvement: a Study on Gender Differences. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research. 2020; 85: 40–49.

[45] Harman A, Burrows L. Leaning in while sticking out: Fat, exer-cise, and guilt. Fat Studies. 2019; 8: 187–202.