Article Data

  • Views 3168
  • Dowloads 209

Original Research

Open Access

Gender, social stratification, and differences in sports participation among Korean adults: data from the 2019 Korea National Sports Participation Survey

  • Su Yeon Roh1
  • Ik Young Chang2,*,

1Department of Exercise Rehabilitation and Welfare, College of Health Science, Gachon University, 21936 Inchon, Republic of Korea

2Department of Sport Coaching, College of Sport Science, Korea National Sport University, 05541 Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1808168 Vol.18,Issue 8,August 2022 pp.1-11

Published: 31 August 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Ik Young Chang E-mail: ikyoungchang@knsu.ac.kr

Abstract

Background: Sports participation is influenced by various factors. Among them, gender and social stratification are most relevant to the creation of a divide in sports participation. To date, studies have focused on the degree of sports participation (period, frequency, and intensity); the form of participation (behavioral, affective, and cognitive), and the type of sports participation according to gender and social stratification. Although gender and social stratification are inseparable factors in sports participation, little is known about the inequality in sports participation caused by both factors. Therefore, this study aims to examine how Korean men and women participate differently in sports according to their social stratification. Methods: Out of 9000 samples from the 2019 Korea National Sports Participation Survey (KNSPS) conducted by the Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, data from 5366 individuals were analyzed in this study. SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform multiple correspondence analysis and cross-tabulation analysis. Results: This study found that for men, the lower the social stratification, the more frequent the participation in less capitalintensive sports (e.g., gateball, walking, and stretching exercises). Meanwhile, women tend to participate in sports such as aerobics, yoga, and dance sports. These are popularly referred to as “women’s sports” which evidences social stratification. Conclusions: This study reveals through national statistical indicators that there is a difference in the types of sports in which Korean men and women participate according to social stratification. Thus, gender and stratification inequalities may be inherent in the modern Korean society for sports participation.


Keywords

gender; social stratification; inequality; Korean adults; difference in sports participation


Cite and Share

Su Yeon Roh,Ik Young Chang. Gender, social stratification, and differences in sports participation among Korean adults: data from the 2019 Korea National Sports Participation Survey. Journal of Men's Health. 2022. 18(8);1-11.

References

[1] Wicker P, Hallmann K, Breuer C. Analyzing the impact of sport infrastructure on sport participation using geo-coded data: ev-idence from multi-level models. Sport Management Review. 2013; 16: 54–67.

[2] Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. 2019 Korea national Sport participation Survey. Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism: Sejong. 2019.

[3] Larsson H, Larsson B. Social stratification of physical activity. An exploration into how logics of practice affect participation in movement culture. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2021; 1¬–16.

[4] Collins M. Sport and social exclusion. Routledge: London. 2014.

[5] Gemar A. The social patterning of sport: dispositions in regular sport participation and stratification in Canada. World Leisure Journal. 2019; 63: 1–21.

[6] Chalabaev A, Sarrazin P, Fontayne P, Boiché J, Clément-Guillotin C. The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2013; 14: 136–144.

[7] Kidd B. Sports and masculinity. Sport in Society. 2013; 16: 553–564.

[8] Hardin M, Greer JD. The influence of gender-role socialization, media use and sports participation on perceptions of gender-appropriate sports. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2009; 32: 207.

[9] Gemar A. The stratification of professional sports following: so-cial position and the consumption of major professional sports leagues in Canada. Leisure Studies. 2019; 38: 775–789.

[10] Kokolakakis T, Lera-López F, Panagouleas T. Analysis of the determinants of sports participation in Spain and England. Ap-plied Economics. 2012; 44: 2785–2798.

[11] Kono S, Kim J, Gui J, McDaniel JT. Social-Demographic Cor-relates of Leisure-Time Physical Activities: A Secondary Data Analysis of a Large-Scale Survey in the U.S. International Jour-nal of the Sociology of Leisure. 2018; 1: 261–282.

[12] Stempel C. Adult Participation Sports as Cultural Capital: a test of Bourdieu’s theory of the field of sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2005; 40: 411–432.

[13] Widdop P, Cutts D. Social Stratification and Sports’ Participa-tion in England. Leisure Sciences. 2013; 35: 107–128.

[14] Anthony CE, Swank JM. Black college student-athletes: Exam-ining the intersection of gender, and racial identity and athletic identity. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Educa-tion. 2018; 12: 179–199.

[15] Carter-Francique AR, Flowers CL. Intersections of Race, Eth-nicity, and Gender in Sport. Gender Relations in Sport. 2013; 43: 73–93.

[16] Johnson CME. “Just because I Dance like a Ho I’m not a Ho”: Cheerleading at the Intersection of Race, Class, and Gender. So-ciology of Sport Journal. 2015; 32: 377–394.

[17] Zenquis MR, Mwaniki MF. The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Nationality in Sport: Media Representation of the Ogwu-mike Sisters. Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 2019; 43: 23–43.

[18] Reeves A. Social Stratification, Gender and Sport Participation. Sociological Research Online. 2012; 17: 1–17.

[19] Messner MA. When bodies are weapons: Masculinity and vio-lence in Sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1990; 25: 203–220.

[20] Colley A, Berman E, Van Millingen L. Age and gender differ-ences in youth people’s perceptions of sport participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2005; 35: 1440–1454.

[21] Schmalz DL, Davison KK. Differences in physical self-concept among pre-adolescents who participate in gender-typed and cross-gendered sports. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2006; 29: 335–3527.

[22] Koivula N. Perceived characteristics of sports categorized as gender-neutral, feminine and masculine. Journal of Sport Be-havior. 2001; 24: 377–393.

[23] Sobal J, Milgrim M. Gendertyping sports: social representations of masculine, feminine, and neither-gendered sports among us university students. Journal of Gender Studies. 2019; 28: 29–44.

[24] Hong J, Lee B. Gender Typing of Sports: Korean College Stu-dents’ Perception of Gender Stereotype in Sports. Korean Jour-nal of Sports Science. 2020; 29: 71–82.

[25] McGinnis L, McQuillan J, Chapple CL. I Just Want to Play: women, sexism, and persistence in golf. Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 2005; 29: 313–337.

[26] Cagas JY, Biddle SJH, Vergeer I. Yoga not a (physical) cul-ture for men? Understanding the barriers for yoga participa-tion among men. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2021; 42: 101262.

[27] Coakley JJ. Sport in society: issues & controversies. New York McGraw-Hill Inc: New York. 2008.

[28] Kahma N. Sport and social class: the case of Finland. Interna-tional Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2012; 47: 113–130.

[29] Breuer C, Hallmann K, Wicker P. Determinants of sport partic-ipation in different sports. Managing Leisure. 2011; 16: 269–286.

[30] Mutz M, Müller J. Social stratification of leisure time sport and exercise activities: comparison of ten popular sports activities. Leisure Studies. 2021; 40: 597–611.

[31] Haut J. Social inequalities in sports behavior and cultural tastes. Münster: Waxmann. 2011.

[32] Nam HW. Speciality of sport demand: leisure demand and de-terminant of sport consumption. Korean Journal of Physical Ed-ucation. 2004; 43: 131–140.

[33] Park HW, Chae JS. A social class background of students ac-cording to the type and degree of participation in sport partici-pation effect. Journal of Korean Society of Sport Policy. 2011; 9: 75–86.

[34] Han LS. Socio-economic status and patterns of sports participa-tion of youth. Yongin University 2000; 18: 183–213.

[35] Jin KJ, Chang IY. Participating in Sports Events, the Use of Sports Facilities and the Existence of the Social Stratification: Empirical Verification using Data from National Sports Survey. Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport. 2021; 34: 129–147.

[36] Little C. Gender, Class and Sporting Opportunity: Working-Class Women and Sport in Early Twentieth-Century Australia. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 2014; 31: 1677–1693.

[37] Statistics Korea. Compulsory elementary and middle school ed-ucation and high school and college enrollment rates. Statistics Korea: Sejong. 2019.

[38] Statistics Korea. Korean standard classification of occupations. Statistics Korea: Sejong. 2018.

[39] Noh HJ. Analysis and response analysis of the division table us-ing SPSS. Gyeonggido: Hakhyunsa. 2004.

[40] Roberts K. Leisure in contemporary society. CABI Publishing: Oxford. 1999.

[41] Fredricks JA, Eccles JS. Family Socialization, Gender, and Sport Motivation and Involvement. Journal of Sport and Exer-cise Psychology. 2005; 27: 3–31.

[42] Messner MA. When bodies are weapons: Masculinity and vio-lence in Sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1990; 25: 203–220.

[43] Lau PWC, Cheung MWL, Ransdell L. Sport identity and sport participation: a cultural comparison between Collective and In-dividualistic Societies. International Journal of Sport and Exer-cise Psychology. 2007; 5: 66–81.

[44] Messner M. Taking the field: women, men, and sports. Univer-sity of Minnesotta Press: Minneapolis. 2002.

[45] Fowlie J, Eime RM, Griffiths K. Barriers to adolescent female participation in cricket. Annals of Leisure Research. 2021; 24: 513–531.

[46] Green K. Key themes in youth sport. Routledge: Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon. 2019.

[47] Migliaccio TA, Berg EC. Women’s participation in tackle foot-ball: An exploration of benefits and constraints. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2007; 42: 271–287.

[48] Downward P, Riordan J. Social interactions and the demand for sport: An economic analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy. 2007; 25: 518–537.

[49] Jang IC, Han JY. Sport Participation form and Degree in Accor-dance with the Social Stratification in Korea. Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport. 2014; 27: 67–87.

[50] Berger IE, O’Reilly N, Parent MM, Séguin B, Hernandez T. De-terminants of Sport Participation among Canadian Adolescents. Sport Management Review. 2008; 11: 277–307.

[51] Ko J, Choi M, Kim M. The Socio-demographic Determinants on Participation of Physical Activities. Korean Journal of Sport Science. 2014; 25: 701–712.

[52] Breuer C, Wicker P. Demographic and economic factors influ-encing the inclusion in the German sport system – a microanal-ysis of the year 1985 to 2005. European Journal for Sport and Society. 2008; 5: 33–42.

[53] Bhargava D. Barriers to women participation in sports and phys-ical activity in southern Rajasthan. Journal of Commerce and Trade. 2017; 12: 89–97.

[54] Chung YN. Women’s constraints to participation in leisure sports. Korean Journal of Sport Science. 2008; 17: 295–307.

[55] Henderson KA, Bedini LA. Women, leisure, and “double wham-mies”: empowerment and constraint. Journal of Leisurability. 1997; 24: 36–46.

[56] Ji HJ. What discourages the married Korean females from doing sport vs. non-sport leisure activities. Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation and Park. 2006; 30: 17–26.

[57] Selvaratnam V, Snelgrove R, Wood L, Potwarka LR. How con-straints to campus recreation participation differ based on activ-ity type, gender, and citizenship. Recreational Sports Journal. 2021; 45: 61–68.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top