Next-Generation Patient Education: Pilot Program Introduces Virtual Reality for Men’s Preventive Health

Background: Preventive interventions designed to educate men to embrace healthier lifestyles are urgently needed to mitigate the risk of diseases correlated to lifestyle and habits. Virtual reality (VR) technologies offer an immersive visual, tactile, and kinesthetic educational experience, for which male learning style preference may exist. We developed a VR-based cardiovascular health educational session, embedded within a comprehensive annual physical examination, under the hypothesis that VR is both engaging, and effectively educates patients about heart disease. Methods: 208 male patients presenting to a preventive health center were invited to participate in a VR educational session for cardiovascular health and risk education. Exclusion criteria included claustrophobia, light-induced migraines, dizziness, and seizure disorder. Before participating, subjects answered a brief cardiovascular health knowledge assessment. Following the session, they answered an equivalent knowledge assessment, and a survey regarding the experience. Results: Of potential enrollees, 179 (86%) elected to proceed with the VR experience. Reasons for decline included time constraints, apprehension, and no interest. Among participants, 7 (4%) aborted due to: headache (2), claustrophobia (1), and discomfort related to wearing large glasses in the VR headset (4). The initial proportion of correct responses by question demonstrated a median of 56.7% (range 17.7% to 79.7%); following the VR session, a significant rise to 96.7% (range 93.5% to 98.7%) was detected (p = 0.016). Survey results were uniformly positive; 100% of respondees strongly agreed (78%) or agreed (22%) that the VR experience was enjoyable and worthwhile, on a 5-point Likert scale. Conclusions: A VR-based educational program has been incorporated into an annual comprehensive physical examination session, and ultimately may provide education benefits for men. The VR experience was rated very positively and resulted in statistically significant improvements in knowledge around cardiovascular health. Future direct comparisons between these next-generation and traditional patient education methods will establish whether VR approaches offer benefits over traditional patient education methods.

men’s health; preventive health; virtual reality patient education; cardiovascular disease

[1] Poowuttikul P, Seth D. New Concepts and Technological Re-sources in Patient Education and Asthma Self-Management. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. 2020; 59: 19–37.

[2] Campbell BB, Shah S, Gosselin D. Success with Men’s Educa-tional Group Appointments (MEGA): Subjective Improvements in Patient Education. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2009; 3: 173–178.

[3] Campbell BB. A novel approach to educating men about preven-tative health in the digital age. Journal of Men’s Health. 2012; 9: 45–50.

[4] Honigsfeld A, Dunn R. High School Male and Female Learning-Style Similarities and Differences in Diverse Nations. The Jour-nal of Educational Research. 2003; 96: 195–206.

[5] Chadwell D. Engaging the differences between boys and girls. Middle Matters. 2007; 15: 1–2.

[6] Smith JR, Byrum A, McCormick TM, Young N, Orban C, Porter CD. A controlled study of stereoscopic virtual reality in freshman electrostatics. American Physical Society. 2017; 376–379.

[7] Cipresso P, Giglioli IAC, Raya MA, Riva G. Cipresso P, Giglioli IAC, et al. The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: a network and cluster analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018; 9: 2086.

[8] Salvatore SD, Vadalà G, Oggiano L, Russo F, Ambrosio L, Cos-tici PF. Virtual Reality in Preoperative Planning of Adolescent Id-iopathic Scoliosis Surgery Using Google Cardboard. Neurospine. 2021; 18: 199–205.

[9] Gholipour B. Med School without Cadavers? Scientific Ameri-can. 2019; 321: 12–15.

[10] Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, Stathakarou N, Davies D, Saxena N, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical In-ternet Research. 2019; 21: e14676.

[11] Pandrangi VC, Gaston B, Appelbaum NP, Albuquerque FC, Levy MM, Larson RA. The Application of Virtual Reality in Patient Education. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2019; 59: 184–189.

[12] World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases. 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/de tail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed: 20 November 2021)

[13] Centers for Disease Control. Men and Heart Disease. 2021. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/men.htm (Ac-cessed: 20 November 2021).

[14] American Heart Association. CDC Prevention Programs. 2018. Available at: https://www.heart.org/en/get-involved/advoca te/federal-priorities/cdc-prevention-programs (Accessed: 20 November 2021).

[15] Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. In-ternational Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 2: 53–55.

[16] Goldman D, Smith JP. The increasing value of education to health. Social Science & Medicine. 2011; 72: 1728–1737.

[17] Ross CE, Wu C. The Links between Education and Health. Amer-ican Sociological Review. 1995; 60: 719–745.

[18] Stead LF, Buitrago D, Preciado N, Sanchez G, Hartmann-Boyce J, Lancaster T. Physician advice for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013; 2013: CD000165.

[19] Brown A. Younger men play video games, but so do a diverse group of other Americans Pew Research Center. 2017. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/11/younger- men-play-video-games-but-so-do-a-diverse-group-of-other-americans/ (Accessed: 27 November 2021).