The Effects of Robotic Walking and Activity-Based Training on Bladder Complications Associated with Spinal Cord Injury

Background: Traditional Activity-based Training (ABT) and novel Robotic Locomotor Training (RLT) demonstrate promising results for reducing secondary complications associated with SCI, including bladder dysfunction. However, there is a need for increased evidence through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to determine the effect of RLT compared to ABT on bladder function in individuals with incomplete SCI involved in a pilot randomised controlled trial. Methods: Sixteen participants with motor incomplete tetraplegia ($>$1 year) were recruited. The RLT and ABT involved 60-minute sessions, 3$\times$ per week for 24 weeks. The International Lower Urinary Tract Function Basic Data Set was used to assess self-reported bladder health and function over 24 weeks. Results: Across participants, intermittent catheterization, either by self or attendant was used by most of the participants (44%), followed by indwelling catheters (31%). No significant group differences were found for the bladder outcomes over time, except for improvements in urinary function (p = 0.04) at week 24. The odds ratio of 0.26, indicated that the RLT group was less likely to have an improvement in bladder function compared to the ABT group. Both groups tended to show a pattern of decreasing urinary incontinence over time. Conclusions: The ABT group experienced greater benefits in bladder function, but both groups showed a tendency of decreased urinary incontinence over time. Both RLT and ABT interventions may positively benefit the neural circuitries controlling urogenital functions in persons with SCI. RCTs involving larger sample sizes are warranted to further examine these preliminary results.

spinal cord injury; rehabilitation; robotics; exercise; bladder function

[1] Krassioukov A. Autonomic function following cervical spinal cord injury. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology. 2009; 169: 157–164.

[2] Hubscher CH, Herrity AN, Williams CS, Montgomery R, Will-hite AM, Angeli CA, et al. Improvements in bladder, bowel and sexual outcomes following task-specific locomotor training in human spinal cord injury. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13: e0190998.

[3] Gad PN, Kreydin E, Zhong H, Latack K, Edgerton VR. Non-invasive neuromodulation of spinal cord restores lower urinary tract function after paralysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2018; 12: 432.

[4] Krassioukov A, Eng JJ, Claxton G, Sakakibara BM, Shum S. Neurogenic bowel management after spinal cord injury: a sys-tematic review of the evidence. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48: 718–733.

[5] Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JTC, Wolfe and the Spinal Cord In-jury Re DL. The Health and Life Priorities of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review. Journal of Neuro-trauma. 2012; 29: 1548–1555.

[6] Liu C, Attar KH, Gall A, Shah J, Craggs M. The relationship between bladder management and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury in the UK. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48: 319–324.

[7] Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2004; 21: 1371–1383.

[8] Sezer N, Akkuş S, Uğurlu FG. Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2015; 6: 24–33.

[9] Nas K. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2015; 6: 8–16.

[10] Fisher JA, McNelis MA, Gorgey AS, Dolbow DR, Goetz LL. Does Upper Extremity Training Influence Body Composition af-ter Spinal Cord Injury? Aging and Disease. 2015; 6: 271–281.

[11] Jones ML, Harness E, Denison P, Tefertiller C, Evans N, Larson CA. Activity-based Therapies in Spinal Cord Injury:: Clinical Focus and Empirical Evidence in Three Independent Programs. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2012; 18: 34–42.

[12] Jones ML, Evans N, Tefertiller C, Backus D, Sweatman M, Tansey K, et al. Activity-Based Therapy for Recovery of Walk-ing in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014; 95: 2239–2246.e2.

[13] Nash MS, van de Ven I, van Elk N, Johnson BM. Effects of cir-cuit resistance training on fitness attributes and upper-extremity pain in middle-aged men with paraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007; 88: 70–75.

[14] Jones ML, Evans N, Tefertiller C, Backus D, Sweatman M, Tansey K, et al. Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in chronic spinal cord injury: results from a secondary analy-sis to determine responsiveness to therapy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014; 95: 2247–2252.

[15] Papathomas A, Williams TL, Smith B. Understanding physical activity participation in spinal cord injured populations: Three narrative types for consideration. International Journal of Qual-itative Studies on Health and Well-being. 2015; 10: 27295.

[16] Herrity AN, Aslan SC, Ugiliweneza B, Mohamed AZ, Hubscher CH, Harkema SJ. Improvements in bladder function following activity-based recovery training with epidural stimulation after chronic spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2021; 14: 614691.

[17] Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Martin Ginis KA, Arbour KP, McCartney N, Hicks AL. Maintenance of exercise participation in individ-uals with spinal cord injury: effects on quality of life, stress and pain. Spinal Cord. 2003; 41: 446–450.

[18] Fu J, Wang H, Deng L, Li J. Exercise Training Promotes Func-tional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury. Neural Plasticity. 2016; 2016: 4039580.

[19] Hubscher CH, Wyles J, Gallahar A, Johnson K, Willhite A, Harkema SJ, et al. Effect of Different Forms of Activity-Based Recovery Training on Bladder, Bowel, and Sexual Function af-ter Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Re-habilitation. 2021; 102: 865–873.

[20] Gorman PH, Forrest GF, Asselin PK, Scott W, Kornfeld S, Hong E, et al. The effect of exoskeletal-assisted walking on spinal cord injury bowel function : results from a randomized trial and comparison to other physical interventions. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10: 964.

[21] Squair JW, West CR, Krassioukov AV. Neuroprotection, Plastic-ity Manipulation, and Regenerative Strategies to Improve Car-diovascular Function following Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2015; 32: 609–621.

[22] Miller LE, Zimmermann AK, Herbert WG. Clinical effective-ness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in pa-tients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis. Medical Devices. 2016; 9: 455–466.

[23] Shackleton C, Evans R, Shamley D, West S, Albertus Y. Effec-tiveness of over-ground robotic locomotor training in improv-ing walking performance, cardiovascular demands, secondary complications and user-satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019; 51: 723–733.

[24] Martins Â, Silva CM, Gouveia D, Cardoso A, Coelho T, Gamboa Ó, et al. Spinal locomotion in cats following spinal cord injury: A prospective study. Animals. 2021; 11: 1994.

[25] Luginbuehl H, Naeff R, Zahnd A, Baeyens J, Kuhn A, Radlinger L. Pelvic floor muscle electromyography during different run-ning speeds: an exploratory and reliability study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016; 293: 117–124.

[26] Alamro RA, Chisholm AE, Williams AMM, Carpenter MG, Lam T. Overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton elic-its trunk muscle activity in people with high-thoracic motor-complete spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2018; 15: 109.

[27] Williams AMM, Deegan E, Walter M, Stothers L, Lam T. Ex-oskeleton gait training to improve lower urinary tract function in people with motor-complete spinal cord injury: a random-ized pilot trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021; 53: jrm00222.

[28] Swinnen E, Duerinck S, Baeyens J, Meeusen R, Kerckhofs E. Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Journal of Rehabilita-tion Medicine. 2010; 42: 520–526.

[29] Mekki M, Delgado AD, Fry A, Putrino D, Huang V. Robotic Re-habilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review. Neu-rotherapeutics. 2018; 15: 604–617.

[30] Evans RW, Shackleton CL, West S, Derman W, Laurie Rauch H, Baalbergen E, et al. Robotic Locomotor Training Leads to Cardiovascular Changes in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury over a 24-Week Rehabilitation Period: a Random-ized Controlled Pilot Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021; 102: 1447–1456.

[31] Shackleton C, Evans R, West S, Derman W, Albertus Y. Robotic walking for recovery of functional capacity in individu-als with incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized pilot trial. MedRxiv. 2021. (in press)

[32] Biering-Sørensen F, Craggs M, Kennelly M, Schick E, Wyn-daele J. International lower urinary tract function basic spinal cord injury data set. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 325–330.

[33] Morrison SA, Lorenz D, Eskay CP, Forrest GF, Basso DM. Longitudinal Recovery and Reduced Costs after 120 Sessions of Locomotor Training for Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord In-jury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018; 99: 555–562.

[34] Kressler J, Thomas CK, Field-Fote EC, Sanchez J, Widerström-Noga E, Cilien DC, et al. Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014; 95: 1878–1887.e4.

[35] Spungen AM, Asseslin PK, Fineberg DB, Kornfeld SD, Harel NY. Exoskeletal-Assisted walking for persons with motor-complete paraplegia. NATO Science and Technology Organiza-tion. 2013; 6: 6–14.

[36] Forchheimer M, Meade MA, Tate D, Cameron AP, Rodriguez G, DiPonio L. Self-Report of Behaviors to Manage Neurogenic Bowel and Bladder by Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Frequency and Associated Outcomes. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2016; 22: 85–98.