Chinese herbal retention enema combined with magnetic vibration magneto-electric therapy: a promising therapeutic strategy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS)

Background: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common urological condition characterized by complex etiology, high incidence and limited treatment options. Despite extensive research, its pathogenesis remains poorly understood and high-quality, effective therapies are lacking. Methods: This propensity score-matched study assessed 92 patients by evaluating symptom scores, complications, and prognostic outcomes using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), with patients stratified based on baseline characteristics for outcome comparison. Results: The total clinical effective rate was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (91.30%) compared to the control group (76.09%, p < 0.05); the treatment process was uneventful in both groups, and four weeks after treatment, the total NIH-CPSI score and its subscales were significantly lower in the combination therapy group (−17.24 (6.84) vs. −12.54 (7.18), p < 0.05), with a more pronounced reduction in the IPSS score (−6.70 (2.54) vs. −3.87 (2.03), p < 0.05) and superior improvements in both peak and average urine flow rates—especially the latter—while neither regimen produced a significant improvement in mood scores. Conclusions: The combination of Chinese herbal retention enema and magnetic vibration magneto-electric therapy is more effective than magnetic vibration magneto-electric therapy alone in alleviating the primary symptoms of CP/CPPS, suggesting significant potential for broader clinical application. Clinical Trial registration: This study was registered on itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn. And the registration number is ITMCTR2024000191.

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome; Chinese herbal retention enema; Magnetic vibration magneto-electric therapy; Treatment effect; Combination therapy

[1] Clemens JQ, Mullins C, Ackerman AL, Bavendam T, van Bokhoven A, Ellingson BM, et al.; MAPP Research Network Study Group. Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome: insights from the MAPP Research Network. Nature Reviews Urology. 2019; 16: 187–200.

[2] Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death & Differentiation. 2018; 25: 486–541.

[3] Chen J, Zhang H, Niu D, Li H, Wei K, Zhang L, et al. The risk factors related to the severity of pain in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. BMC Urology. 2020; 20: 154.

[4] Shang Y, Cui D, Yi S. Opening tight junctions may be key to opening the blood-prostate barrier. Medical Science Monitor. 2014; 20: 2504–2507.

[5] Wu Z, Liu C, Peng Y, Zhou F, Xu B, Zhang Y, et al. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine retention enema combined with perineal massage (THREM): a promising therapeutic strategy for refractory chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Translational Andrology and Urology. 2024; 13: 759–768.

[6] Na YQ, Sun G, Ye ZQ, Sun YH, Sun ZY, Wang JY, et al. Chapter 8 guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of prostatitis. In Huang J (ed.) Chinese diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for urological diseases (pp. 442–447). 2nd edn. People’s Medical Publishing House: Beijing. 2020.

[7] State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Industry Standards for Traditional Chinese Medicine in the People’s Republic of China: criteria of diagnosis and therapeutic effect of diseases and syndromes in traditional Chinese medicine. State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Beijing. 1994.

[8] Wu C, Zhang Z, Lu Z, Liao M, Zhang Y, Xie Y, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for asymptomatic inflammatory (NIH-IV) prostatitis in Chinese men. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e71298.

[9] Magistro G, Wagenlehner FM, Grabe M, Weidner W, Stief CG, Nickel JC. Contemporary management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. European Urology. 2016; 69: 286–297.

[10] Qiao ZH, Fan WM. Chapter 3 the therapeutic effect of physical factors. In Qiao ZH, Fan WM (eds.) Complete book of physical therapy (pp. 1281–1283). 1st edn. Scientific and Technical Document Press: Beijing. 2001.

[11] Kim TH, Han DH, Cho WJ, Lee HS, You HW, Park CM, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation for treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients who do not respond to pharmacotherapy. Urology. 2013; 82: 894–898.

[12] Yamanishi T, Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, Suda S, Hattori T, Ito H, et al. Comparative study of the effects of magnetic versus electrical stimulation on inhibition of detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2000; 56: 777–781.

[13] Choe JH, Choo MS, Lee KS. Symptom change in women with overactive bladder after extracorporeal magnetic stimulation: a prospective trial. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2007; 18: 875–880.

[14] Yuan SY, He CB, You XJ, Wang YL, Qin Z, Zhang ZL, et al. Magnetic resonance and magnetoelectric therapy combined with Danhong Tongjing Prescription for the treatment of CP/CPPS and its effects on secretory IgA, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and interleukin-8. National Journal of Andrology. 2022; 28: 622–627. (In Chinese)

[15] Gravina AG. The potential therapeutic role of Hericium erinaceus extract in pathologic conditions involving the urogenital-gut axis: insights into the involved mechanisms and mediators. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2024; 75: 3–9.

[16] Romano L, Pellegrino R, Arcaniolo D, Gravina AG, Miranda A, Priadko K, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a cross-sectional observational study. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2024; 56: 628–634.

[17] Herati AS, Moldwin RM. Alternative therapies in the management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. World Journal of Urology. 2013; 31: 761–766.