Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolic panels characteristic for patients with prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen levels of 4–10 ng/mL
1Department of Urology, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, 323000 Lishui, Zhejiang, China
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.041 Vol.21,Issue 3,March 2025 pp.97-111
Submitted: 06 September 2024 Accepted: 04 November 2024
Published: 30 March 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Jie Li E-mail: lijie9783@wmu.edu.cn
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common malignant tumor among men worldwide. This study explores potential metabolic biomarkers and pathways through metabolomics and evaluates the diagnostic performance of a metabolic panel in distinguishing prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatitis. Methods: Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to perform untargeted metabolomic analysis on serum samples from 30 prostate cancer patients, 30 BPH patients, and 30 prostatitis patients. Based on the identified metabolites, LASSO regression was applied for variable selection, and logistic regression and support vector machine models were developed. Results: The LASSO algorithm’s ability to select variables effectively reduced redundant features and minimized model overfitting. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated strong diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve of 0.852 for prostate cancer versus BPH and 0.891 for prostate cancer versus prostatitis. Enrichment analysis revealed that fatty acid metabolism, particularly the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, is a key metabolic feature of prostate cancer. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that metabolites selected through the LASSO algorithm, combined with machine learning models, enhance the early diagnosis of prostate cancer and exhibit excellent performance in distinguishing it from BPH and prostatitis. These findings lay a foundation for precision medicine and disease screening, with potential applications in early intervention and personalized treatment in clinical practice.
Prostate cancer; Metabolomics; LASSO regression; Machine learning models; Fatty acid metabolism
Chen Wang,Ting Chen,Teng-Fei Gu,Sheng-Ping Hu,Yong-Tao Pan,Jie Li. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolic panels characteristic for patients with prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen levels of 4–10 ng/mL. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(3);97-111.
[1] Zhang E, Chen Z, Liu W, Lin L, Wu L, Guan J, et al. NCAPG2 promotes prostate cancer malignancy and stemness via STAT3/c-MYC signaling. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2024; 22: 12.
[2] Ajiboye BO, Fatoki TH, Akinola OG, Ajeigbe KO, Bamisaye AF, Domínguez-Martín EM, et al. In silico exploration of anti-prostate cancer compounds from differential expressed genes. BMC Urology. 2024; 24: 138.
[3] Hu X, Liao J, Shan H, He H, Du Z, Guan M, et al. A novel carboxyl polymer-modified upconversion luminescent nanoprobe for detection of prostate-specific antigen in the clinical gray zonebase by flow immunoassay strip. Methods. 2023; 215: 10–16.
[4] Jue JS, Alameddine M. Role of PSA density and MRI in PSA interpretation. Comment on Lumbreras et al. variables associated with false-positive PSA results: a cohort study with real-world data. Cancers 2023, 15, 261. Cancers. 2023; 15: 2649.
[5] Flores-Fraile MC, Padilla-Fernández BY, Valverde-Martínez S, Marquez-Sanchez M, García-Cenador MB, Lorenzo-Gómez MF, et al. The association between prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV), value and acceleration, and of the free PSA/total PSA index or ratio, with prostate conditions. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 3400.
[6] Abashidze N, Stecher C, Rosenkrantz AB, Duszak R III, Hughes DR. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging following an elevated prostate-specific antigen test. JAMA Network Open. 2021; 4: e2132388.
[7] Nordström T, Discacciati A, Bergman M, Clements M, Aly M, Annerstedt M, et al. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2021; 22: 1240–1249.
[8] Grönberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordström T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y, et al. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50–69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study. The Lancet Oncology. 2015; 16: 1667–1676.
[9] Eklund M, Jäderling F, Discacciati A, Bergman M, Annerstedt M, Aly M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy in prostate cancer screening. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 385: 908–920.
[10] Wang Q, Ding L, Wang R, Liang Z. A review on the morphology, cultivation, identification, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of Kitagawia praeruptora (Dunn) Pimenov. Molecules. 2023; 28: 8153.
[11] Wang H, Yin Y, Zhu ZJ. Encoding LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics data into images toward AI-based clinical diagnosis. Analytical Chemistry. 2023; 95: 6533–6541.
[12] Nie M, Yao K, Zhu X, Chen N, Xiao N, Wang Y, et al. Evolutionary metabolic landscape from preneoplasia to invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Nature Communications. 2021; 12: 6479.
[13] Bondar OP, Barnidge DR, Klee EW, Davis BJ, Klee GG. LC-MS/MS quantification of Zn-alpha2 glycoprotein: a potential serum biomarker for prostate cancer. Clinical Chemistry. 2007; 53: 673–678.
[14] Moses KA, Sprenkle PC, Bahler C, Box G, Carlsson SV, Catalona WJ, et al. NCCN Guidelines® insights: prostate cancer early detection, version 1.2023. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2023; 21: 236–246.
[15] Murthy DP, Ray U, Morewaya J, SenGupta SK. A study of the correlation of prostatic pathology and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels: a perspective from Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Medical Journal. 1998; 41: 59–64.
[16] Wishart DS, Guo A, Oler E, Wang F, Anjum A, Peters H, et al. HMDB 5.0: the human metabolome database for 2022. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022; 50: D622–D631.
[17] Fan S, Kind T, Cajka T, Hazen SL, Tang WHW, Kaddurah-Daouk R, et al. Systematic error removal using random forest for normalizing large-scale untargeted lipidomics data. Analytical Chemistry. 2019; 91: 3590–3596.
[18] Barupal DK, Fiehn O. Chemical Similarity Enrichment Analysis (ChemRICH) as alternative to biochemical pathway mapping for metabolomic datasets. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 14567.
[19] Pang Z, Zhou G, Ewald J, Chang L, Hacariz O, Basu N, et al. Using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 for LC-HRMS spectra processing, multi-omics integration and covariate adjustment of global metabolomics data. Nature Protocols. 2022; 17: 1735–1761.
[20] Yang J, Li J, Xiao L, Zhou M, Fang Z, Cai Y, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based multivariate model for highly accurate and noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in the PSA gray zone. Cancer Imaging. 2023; 23: 81.
[21] AlZaim I, Al-Saidi A, Hammoud SH, Darwiche N, Al-Dhaheri Y, Eid AH, et al. Thromboinflammatory processes at the nexus of metabolic dysfunction and prostate cancer: the emerging role of periprostatic adipose tissue. Cancers. 2022; 14: 1679.
[22] Cerrato A, Bedia C, Capriotti AL, Cavaliere C, Gentile V, Maggi M, et al. Untargeted metabolomics of prostate cancer zwitterionic and positively charged compounds in urine. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2021; 1158: 338381.
[23] Messina E, La Torre G, Pecoraro M, Pisciotti ML, Sciarra A, Poscia R, et al. Design of a magnetic resonance imaging-based screening program for early diagnosis of prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial—Prostate Cancer Secondary Screening in Sapienza (PROSA). European Radiology. 2024; 34: 204–213.
[24] Huang J, Zhao B, Weinstein SJ, Albanes D, Mondul AM. Metabolomic profile of prostate cancer-specific survival among 1812 Finnish men. BMC Medicine. 2022; 20: 362.
[25] Farrell SW, DeFina LF, Tintle NL, Leonard D, Cooper KH, Barlow CE, et al. Association of the omega-3 index with incident prostate cancer with updated meta-analysis: the cooper center longitudinal study. Nutrients. 2021; 13: 384.
[26] Faubert B, Solmonson A, DeBerardinis RJ. Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression. Science. 2020; 368: eaaw5473.
[27] Liu B, Liu C, Chai X, Fan X, Huang T, Zhan J, et al. Real-time NMR-based drug discovery to identify inhibitors against fatty acid synthesis in living cancer cells. Analytical Chemistry. 2024; 96: 3034–3043.
[28] Zhang FB, Gan L, Zhu TH, Ding HQ, Wu CH, Guan YT, et al. Pan-cancer analyses reveal genomics and clinical outcome association of the fatty acid oxidation regulators in cancer. Heliyon. 2024; 10: e28441.
[29] Berquin IM, Edwards IJ, Kridel SJ, Chen YQ. Polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism in prostate cancer. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. 2011; 30: 295–309.
[30] Cao Z, Xu Y, Guo F, Chen X, Ji J, Xu H, et al. FASN Protein overexpression indicates poor biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostate cancer. Disease Markers. 2020; 2020: 3904947.
[31] Dłubek J, Rysz J, Jabłonowski Z, Gluba-Brzózka A, Franczyk B. The correlation between lipid metabolism disorders and prostate cancer. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2021; 28: 2048–2061.
[32] Watt MJ, Clark AK, Selth LA, Haynes VR, Lister N, Rebello R, et al. Suppressing fatty acid uptake has therapeutic effects in preclinical models of prostate cancer. Science Translational Medicine. 2019; 11: eaau5758.
[33] Sena LA, Denmeade SR. Fatty acid synthesis in prostate cancer: vulnerability or epiphenomenon? Cancer Research. 2021; 81: 4385–4393.
[34] Galbraith L, Leung HY, Ahmad I. Lipid pathway deregulation in advanced prostate cancer. Pharmacological Research. 2018; 131: 177–184.
[35] Mukherjee S, Papadopoulos D, Chari N, Ellis D, Charitopoulos K, Charitopoulos I, et al. High-grade prostate cancer demonstrates preferential growth in the cranio-caudal axis and provides discrimination of disease grade in an MRI parametric model. British Journal of Radiology. 2024; 97: 574–582.
[36] Lovegrove CE, Matanhelia M, Randeva J, Eldred-Evans D, Tam H, Miah S, et al. Prostate imaging features that indicate benign or malignant pathology on biopsy. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2018; 7: S420–S435.
[37] Lee CM, Park KJ, Kim MH, Kim JK. Ancillary imaging and clinical features for the characterization of prostate lesions: a proposed approach to reduce false positives. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021; 53: 1887–1897.
[38] Parmar C, Barry JD, Hosny A, Quackenbush J, Aerts HJWL. Data analysis strategies in medical imaging. Clinical Cancer Research. 2018; 24: 3492–3499.
[39] Kuzudisli C, Bakir-Gungor B, Bulut N, Qaqish B, Yousef M. Review of feature selection approaches based on grouping of features. PeerJ. 2023; 11: e15666.
[40] Remeseiro B, Bolon-Canedo V. A review of feature selection methods in medical applications. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2019; 112: 103375.
[41] McNitt-Gray M, Napel S, Jaggi A, Mattonen SA, Hadjiiski L, Muzi M, et al. Standardization in quantitative imaging: a multicenter comparison of radiomic features from different software packages on digital reference objects and patient data sets. Tomography. 2020; 6: 118–128.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top