Article Data

  • Views 312
  • Dowloads 141

Original Research

Open Access

The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations

  • Mehmet Kale1,*,
  • Abdurrahman Boyacı2
  • Ali Berkay Tolalı2
  • Yeliz Yol3
  • Ezgi Ayaz2
  • Murat Tutar4
  • Umut Davut Başoğlu5

1Department of Coach Training in Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Eskisehir Technical University, 26555 Eskisehir, Turkey

2Department of Coaching Education, School of Physical Education and Sports, Istanbul Nisantası University, 34398 Istanbul, Turkey

3Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Hamidiye Life Sciences, Health Sciences University, 34668 Istanbul, Turkey

4Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Istanbul Gedik University, 34365 Istanbul, Turkey

5Department of Recreation, School of Physical Education and Sports, Istanbul Nisantası University, 34398 Istanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.038 Vol.21,Issue 3,March 2025 pp.66-76

Submitted: 20 July 2024 Accepted: 10 November 2024

Published: 30 March 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Mehmet Kale E-mail: mkale@eskisehir.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: There is no study about the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in different set configurations. This study aimed to compare the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations. Methods: The study included 27 volunteer university students (age: 20.0 ± 1.2 year, height: 180.2 ± 6.9 cm, body weight: 76.0 ± 11.8 kg). Static foot plantar pressure (SFPP), countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) were performed as pre-tests 8 min after the half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM) test. After pre-tests, 12 reps of training were performed with 70% of the HS 1RM by varying the training configurations of 1 × 12 reps traditional set (TS) on the 4th day, 3 × 4 reps cluster set 1 (CS1) with 30 s rest on the 8th day, and 6 × 2 reps cluster set 2 (CS2) with 10 s rest on the 12th day. Post-tests were performed in the following of each configuration. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for the statistical comparison of the tests in four different time intervals. Results: There were no statistically significant SFPP differences in four different time periods, while statistically significant differences were found in the CMJ (p < 0.001) and SJ (p = 0.002). Pairwise comparisons showed that CMJ pre-test (CMJPRE) had statistically significant differences with CMJTS , CMJCS1 and CMJCS2. There were also differences between SJPRE and SJCS1, SJTS and SJCS2 for the SJ (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, based on the results of the study, it is recommended to use any of the TS, CS1 and CS2 configurations to increase CMJ and to use the CS1 configuration to increase SJ as a performance enhancement at 8 min post-activity.


Keywords

Half-squat; Intensity; Plantar pressure; Countermovement jump; Squat jump


Cite and Share

Mehmet Kale,Abdurrahman Boyacı,Ali Berkay Tolalı,Yeliz Yol,Ezgi Ayaz,Murat Tutar,Umut Davut Başoğlu. The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(3);66-76.

References

[1] Mota T, Silva R, Clemente F. Holistic soccer profile by position: a theoretical framework. Human Movement. 2021; 24: 4–20.

[2] Stone MH, Hornsby WG, Suarez DG, Duca M, Pierce KC. Training specificity for athletes: emphasis on strength-power training: a narrative review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2022; 7: 102.

[3] Lopez P, Radaelli R, Taaffe DR, Newton RU, Galvão DA, Trajano GS, et al. Resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2021; 53: 1206–1216.

[4] Kassiano W, de Vasconcelos Costa BD, Lima-Júnior D, Gantois P, de Souza Fonseca F, da Cunha Costa M, et al. Parasympathetic nervous activity responses to different resistance training systems. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021; 42: 82–89.

[5] Held S, Rappelt L, Deutsch JP, Donath L. Jump and sprint performance directly and 24 h after velocity-vs. failure-based training. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022; 44: 199–205.

[6] Jukic I, Helms ER, McGuigan MR, García-Ramos A. Using cluster and rest redistribution set structures as alternatives to resistance training prescription method based on velocity loss thresholds. PeerJ. 2022; 10: e13195.

[7] Api G, Legnani RFDS, Foschiera DB, Clemente FM, Legnani E. Influence of cluster sets on mechanical and perceptual variables in adolescent athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20: 2810.

[8] de Carvalho E Silva GI, Brandão LHA, Dos Santos Silva D, de Jesus Alves MD, Aidar FJ, de Sousa Fernandes MS, et al. Acute neuromuscular, physiological and performance responses after strength training in runners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine—Open. 2022; 8: 105.

[9] Ciocca G, Tschan H, Tessitore A. Effects of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) induced by a plyometric protocol on deceleration performance. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2021; 8: 5–16.

[10] Eon P, Jubeau M, Cattagni T. Post-activation potentiation after isometric contractions is strongly related to contraction intensity despite the similar torque—time integral. Experimental Physiology. 2024; 109: 915–925.

[11] Prieske O, Behrens M, Chaabene H, Granacher U, Maffiuletti NA. Time to differentiate postactivation “potentiation” from “performance enhancement” in the strength and conditioning community. Sports Medicine. 2020; 50: 1559–1565.

[12] Sharma SK, Raza S, Moiz JA, Verma S, Naqvi IH, Anwer S, et al. Postactivation potentiation following acute bouts of plyometric versus heavy—resistance exercise in collegiate soccer players. Biomed Research International. 2018; 2018: 3719039.

[13] Rassier DE, MacIntosh BR. Coexistence of potentiation and fatigue in skeletal muscle. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2000; 33: 499–508.

[14] Garbisu-Hualde A, Santos-Concejero J. Post-activation potentiation in strength training: a systematic review of the scientific literature. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2021; 78: 141–150.

[15] Gautam A, Singh P, Varghese V. Effects of post-activation potentiation enhacement on sprint and change-of-direction performance in athletes: a systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2024; 39; 243–250.

[16] Davies TB, Tran DL, Hogan CM, Haff GG, Latella C. Chronic effects of altering resistance training set configurations using cluster sets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2021; 51: 707–736.

[17] Rappelt L, Held S, Leicht M, Wicker P, Donath L. Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set vs. traditional home-based online training: a 6 weeks randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2022; 4: 968258.

[18] Piqueras-Sanchiz F, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J, Bachero-Mena B, Sánchez-Moreno M, Martín-Rodríguez S, et al. Acute mechanical, neuromuscular, and metabolic responses to different set configurations in resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022; 36: 2983–2991.

[19] Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Seitz LB, Williamson BD, et al. Maintenance of velocity and power with cluster sets during high-volume back squats. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2016; 11: 885–892.

[20] Wetmore AB, Wagle JP, Sams ML, Taber CB, DeWeese BH, Sato K, et al. Cluster set loading in the back squat: kinetic and kinematic implications. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2019; 33: S19–S25.

[21] García-Ramos A, González-Hernández JM, Baños-Pelegrín E, Castaño-Zambudio A, Capelo-Ramírez F, Boullosa D, et al. Mechanical and metabolic responses to traditional and cluster set configurations in the bench press exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2020; 34: 663–670.

[22] Tufano JJ, Halaj M, Kampmiller T, Novosad A, Buzgo G. Cluster sets vs. traditional sets: levelling out the playing field using a power-based threshold. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13: e0208035.

[23] Dalton-Alves F, Martins L, Kassiano W, Simim M, Medeiros AIA, DE O Assumpção C. Acute effects of different set configurations on neuromuscular, metabolic, and perceptual responses in young women. International Journal of Exercise Science. 2023; 16: 974–986.

[24] Vianna DL, Greve JMD. Relationship between ankle and foot mobility and the magnitude of the vertical ground reaction force. Brazilian Journal of Physics. 2006; 10: 339–345.

[25] Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2010; 46: 239–248.

[26] Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorel R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. 1st edn. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL. 1988.

[27] Pallarés JG, Sánchez-Medina L, Pérez CE, De La Cruz-Sánchez E, Mora-Rodriguez R. Imposing a pause between the eccentric and concentric phases increases the reliability of isoinertial strength assessments. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2014; 32: 1165–1175.

[28] Scoppa F, Capra R, Gallamini M, Shiffer R. Clinical stabilometry standardization: basic definitions–acquisition interval–sampling frequency. Gait & Posture. 2013; 37: 290–292.

[29] Bosco C, Komi PV. Potentiation of the mechanical behaviour of the human skeletal muscle through prestretching. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1979; 106: 467–472.

[30] Held S, Rappelt L, Deutsch JP, Donath L. Valid and reliable barbell velocity estimation using an inertial measurement unit. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 9170.

[31] Feuerbacher JF, Jacobs MW, Dragutinovic B, Goldmann JP, Cheng S, Schumann M. Validity and test-retest reliability of the Vmaxpro sensor for evaluation of movement velocity in the deep squat. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022; 37: 35–40.

[32] Richardson JT. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review. 2011; 6: 135–147.

[33] Moreno, SD, Brown, LE, Coburn JW, Judelson DA. Effect of cluster sets on plyometric jump power. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2014; 28: 2424–2428.

[34] Morales-Artacho AJ, Padial P, García-Ramos A, Pérez-Castilla A, Feriche B. Influence of a cluster set configuration on the adaptations to short-term power training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018; 32: 930–937.

[35] Asadi A, Ramírez-Campillo R. Effects of cluster vs. traditional plyometric training sets on maximal-intensity exercise performance. Medicina. 2016; 52: 41–45.

[36] González-Hernández JM, García-Ramos A, Castaño-Zambudio A, Capelo-Ramírez F, Marquez G, Boullosa D, et al. Mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual acute responses to different set configurations in full squat. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2020; 34: 1581–1590.

[37] Cuevas-Aburto J, Jukic I, Chirosa-Ríos LJ, González-Hernández JM, Janicijevic D, Barboza-González P, et al. Effect of traditional, cluster, and rest redistribution set configurations on neuromuscular and perceptual responses during strength-oriented resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022; 36: 1490–1497.

[38] Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Aagaard P, Sánchez-Medina L, Ribas-Serna J, Mora-Custodio R, et al. Time course of recovery from resistance exercise with different set configurations. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2020; 34: 2867–2876.

[39] Jukic I, Ramos AG, Helms ER, McGuigan MR, Tufano JJ. Acute effects of cluster and rest redistribution set structures on mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual fatigue during and after resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2020; 50: 2209–2236.

[40] Moran-Navarro R, Perez CE, Mora-Rodriguez R, de la Cruz-Sanchez E, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Sanchez-Medina L, et al. Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failure. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2017; 117: 2387–2399.

[41] Iacono AD, Beato M, Halperin I. The effects of cluster-set and traditional-set postactivation potentiation protocols on vertical jump performance. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2019; 15: 464–469.

[42] Paillard T. Effects of general and local fatigue on postural control: a review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2012; 36: 162–176.

[43] Yu HB, Li J, Zhang R, Hao WY, Lin JZ, Tai WH. Effects of jump-rope-specific footwear selection on lower extremity biomechanics. Bioengineering. 2022; 9: 135.

[44] Mora JAO, Serrão RJ, Garcia G, Oliveira L, Federighi Baisi Chagas E. The analysis of plantar pressure during dynamic squat movement in asymptomatic volleyball athletes before and after fatigue protocol. Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal. 2022; 20: 1–6.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top