Article Data

  • Views 409
  • Dowloads 161

Original Research

Open Access

Knowledge levels of male agricultural workers about colorectal cancer, health belief levels and determination of cancer risk

  • Yusuf Güver1
  • Nükhet Ballıel2,*,

1Department of Public Health Nursing, Akdeniz University Nursing Faculty, 07070 Antalya, Türkiye

2Department of Public Health Nursing, Aydın Adnan Menderes University Nursing Faculty, 09010 Aydın, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.035 Vol.21,Issue 3,March 2025 pp.44-50

Submitted: 22 January 2024 Accepted: 24 September 2024

Published: 30 March 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Nükhet Ballıel E-mail: nukhet.kirag@adu.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer deaths worldwide and ranks among the top 3 cancer types in Turkey. Methods: This cross sectional study aimed to determine the knowledge, health beliefs, risk levels, and related factors of colorectal cancer among male agricultural workers in a western Turkish city with intense agricultural activities. During the data collection period, from November 2020 to January 2021, 205 male agricultural workers volunteered to participate in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0. Results: Confidence-benefit-health motivation scores of male agricultural workers differ significantly according to the status of undergoing colonoscopy in the past ten years (p < 0.05). Confidence-benefit-health motivation scores of male agricultural workers also differ significantly according to the presence of occult blood in the stool within the last year (p < 0.05). When examining the correlation analyses between Confidence/Benefits/Health Motivation, Susceptibility and CRC knowledge level, a positive correlation (p < 0.05) was found between CRC knowledge level and Confidence/Benefits/Health Motivation scores. Male agricultural workers showed low participation in CRC screenings, with a significant link to their level of health belief. The study aimed to assess participants’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding CRC screenings. Only 21.5% received information from health professionals, and 10.7% underwent FOBT in the last year, suggesting information alone is insufficient to boost screening rates. Conclusions: Comprehensive strategies, including addressing smoking, alcohol use and physical inactivity, along with enhancing health beliefs, may improve screening rates and reduce cancer risk.


Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Health beliefs; Male agricultural workers; Knowledge level


Cite and Share

Yusuf Güver,Nükhet Ballıel. Knowledge levels of male agricultural workers about colorectal cancer, health belief levels and determination of cancer risk. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(3);44-50.

References

[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209–249.

[2] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2020; 70: 7–30.

[3] Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. The Lancet. 2019; 394: 1467–1480.

[4] Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2019; 16: 713–732.

[5] Mafiana RN, Al Lawati AS, Waly MI, Al Farsi Y, Al Kindi M, Al Moundhri M. Association between dietary and lifestyle indices and colorectal cancer in oman: a case-control study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2018; 19: 3117–3122.

[6] Ilgaz A, Gözüm S. Determination of colorectal cancer risk levels, colorectal cancer screening rates, and factors affecting screening participation of individuals working in agriculture in Türkiye. Cancer Nursing. 2018; 41: 46–54.

[7] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 7–33.

[8] Turkish Republic Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health. Türkiye cancer statistics 2017. 2021. Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/Dokumanlar/Istatistikler/Turkiye_Kanser_Istatistikleri_2017_OZETLI.pdf (Accessed: 10 April 2022).

[9] Lerro CC, Koutros S, Andreotti G, Hines CJ, Blair A, Lubin J, et al. Use of acetochlor and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study. International Journal of Cancer. 2015; 137: 1167–1175.

[10] Martin FL, Martinez EZ, Stopper H, Garcia SB, Uyemura SA, Kannen V. Increased exposure to pesticides and colon cancer: early evidence in Brazil. Chemosphere. 2018; 209: 623–631.

[11] Rakhshanderou S, Maghsoudloo M, Safari-Moradabadi A, Ghaffari M. Theoretically designed interventions for colorectal cancer prevention: a case of the health belief model. BMC Medical Education. 2020; 20: 270.

[12] Huang J, Wang J, Pang TW, Chan MK, Leung S, Chen X, et al. Does theory of planned behaviour play a role in predicting uptake of colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional study in Hong Kong. BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e037619.

[13] Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Kastner M, Vuong V, Perrier L, Daly C, Rabeneck L, et al. Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2016; 25: 907–917.

[14] Andreotti G, Hou L, Beane Freeman LE, Mahajan R, Koutros S, Coble J, et al. Body mass index, agricultural pesticide use and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study cohort. Cancer Causes & Control. 2010; 21: 1759–1775.

[15] Genç Z, Baysal HY. Effect of colorectal cancer-related health beliefs of the individuals who attend primary care on fecal occult blood test. Health and Public. 2020; 30: 90–97. (In Turkish)

[16] Khani Jeihooni A, Kashfi SM, Shokri A, Kashfi SH, Karimi S. Investigating factors associated with FOBT screening for colorectal cancer based on the components of health belief model and social support. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2017; 18: 2163–2169.

[17] Taheri-Kharameh Z, Noorizadeh F, Sangy S, Zamanian H, Shouri-Bidgoli AR, Oveisi H. Factors associated with adherence to colorectal cancer screening among moderate risk individuals in Iran. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2016; 16: 8371–8375.

[18] Menon U, Szalacha L, Prabhughate A, Kue J. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among South Asian immigrants in the United States. Cancer Nursing. 2014; 37: 19–27.

[19] Smith RA, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2013; 63: 88–105.

[20] Joseph DA, King JB, Miller JW, Richardson LC; Centers for Disease Control. Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults—behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2012; 61: 51–56.

[21] Jacobs L. Health beliefs of first-degree relatives of individuals with colorectal cancer and participation in health maintenance visits: a population-based survey. Cancer Nursing. 2002; 25: 251–265.

[22] Özsoy S, Ardahan M, Özmen D. Reliability and validity of the colorectel cancer screening belief scale in Türkiye. Cancer Nursing. 2007; 30: 139–145.

[23] Acar Vaizoğlu S, Turhan T, Temel F, Bolat Ö, Baydar O, Bacanlı A, et al. Determination of risk factors associated with colorectal cancer and compliance with fecal occult blood testing among patients aged 50 years and over in primary health center. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2010; 13: 79–86.

[24] Açıkgöz A, Çımrın D, Ergör G. Determination of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer environmental risk factors and risk levels: case-control study. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2018; 43: 411–421. (In Turkish)

[25] Colditz GA, Atwood KA, Emmons K, Monson RR, Willett WC, Trichopoulos D, et al. Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: harvard cancer risk index. Risk index working group, harvard center for cancer prevention. Cancer Causes & Control. 2000; 11: 477–488.

[26] Voelker R. Quick uptakes: online risk assessment expands. JAMA. 2000; 284: 430.

[27] Kim DJ, Rockhill B, Colditz GA. Validation of the harvard cancer risk index: a prediction tool for individual cancer risk. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004; 57: 332–340.

[28] Çetin H. Health belief levels of the adult program for colorectal cancer prevention and participation in screening [master’s thesis]. Konya: Selcuk University Institute of Health Sciences. 2019.

[29] Koçak AA. Teachers’ health beliefs on preventing colorectal cancer [master’s thesis]. Muğla: Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institute of Health Sciences. 2018.

[30] Öztaş B, İyigün E, Taştan S, Can MF, Öztaş M. Determination of cancer risk perceptions and health beliefs of first-degree relatives of patients who were operated with colorectal cancer diagnosis. Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2018; 28: 80–87.

[31] Ben Natan M, Abu Husayn A, Haj Muhamad R. Intention to undergo faecal occult blood testing in an ethnic minority. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2019; 25: e12721.

[32] Lin TY, Chuang ST, Huang SF, Hsu HP, Lu LT, Guo JL. Likelihood of a fecal occult blood test uptake among older adults: comparisons between health professionals and healthcare volunteers based on the health belief model. BMC Geriatrics. 2019; 19: 51.

[33] Bae N, Park S, Lim S. Factors associated with adherence to fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening among adults in the Republic of Korea. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2014; 18: 72–77.

[34] Taş F, Kocaöz S, Çirpan R. The effect of knowledge and health beliefs about colorectal cancer on screening behaviour. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019; 28: 4471–4477.

[35] Koo JH, Leong RW, Ching J, Yeoh KG, Wu DC, Murdani A, et al. Asia Pacific Working Group in Colorectal Cancer. Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and barriers to participation of colorectal cancer screening tests in the Asia-Pacific region: a multicenter study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012; 76: 126–135.

[36] Erçolak V. Epidemiology and risk factors in colorectal cancer. Clinical Medicine Family Medicine. 2016; 8: 11–15.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top