Article Data

  • Views 323
  • Dowloads 151

Original Research

Open Access

Intention to make preconception lifestyle changes among married men in an urban primary care clinic and its association with self-efficacy

  • Siti Solehah Ahmad Mazlan1
  • Irmi Zarina Ismail2,*,
  • Navin Kumar Devaraj2

1Trong Health Clinic, Ministry of Health, 34800 Taiping, Perak, Malaysia

2Department of Family Medicine, University of Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.191 Vol.20,Issue 11,November 2024 pp.112-119

Submitted: 08 June 2024 Accepted: 23 August 2024

Published: 30 November 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Irmi Zarina Ismail E-mail: irmiismail@upm.edu.my

Abstract

Men’s lifestyle is a relevant factor influencing pregnancy outcomes; however, their participation in preconception health is often overlooked. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of men’s intention to implement preconception lifestyle changes and the factors that influence it. This single-centre, cross-sectional study used systematic random sampling to invite 352 married men with pregnancy plans who attended the clinic from February until April 2023. The respondent’s intention, self-efficacy, and social influences regarding preconception lifestyle changes were assessed through a validated self-administered questionnaire. A median score of 5 (minimum = 0, maximum = 10) was used as the cutoff to categorise intention as either low or high as the outcome variable. A total of 352 respondents were invited, and 284 (79.6%) men completed the questionnaire. Overall, 56.7% (n = 161) of married men indicated high intentions to make preconception lifestyle changes. The positive predictors of the intention to make preconception lifestyle changes among married men were having attended preconception counselling (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 13.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.82–63.02, p = 0.001), having higher self-efficacy (aOR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.39–2.24, p < 0.001), influence of social norms (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.03–1.87, p = 0.030), and social influence from recognising the importance of other’s opinions (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12–1.35, p < 0.001). More than half of the respondents have the intention to make preconception lifestyle changes. Preconception lifestyle interventions should focus on fostering self-efficacy among men with substance dependence to facilitate behavioural changes by leveraging their social influences.


Keywords

Preconception; Lifestyle changes; Men; Intention; Self-efficacy; Social influences


Cite and Share

Siti Solehah Ahmad Mazlan,Irmi Zarina Ismail,Navin Kumar Devaraj. Intention to make preconception lifestyle changes among married men in an urban primary care clinic and its association with self-efficacy. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(11);112-119.

References

[1] Division of Family Health Development, Ministry of Health Malaysia. Perinatal care manual 4th edition. 2013. Available at: https://hq.moh.gov.my/bpkk/images/PERINATAL_CARE_MANUAL_4th_Edition_2020_11Mei2023.pdf (Accessed: 09 September 2024).

[2] Johnson K, Posner SF, Biermann J, Cordero JF, Atrash HK, Parker CS, et al. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR preconception care work group and the select panel on preconception care. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2006; 55: 1–23.

[3] Shawe J, Patel D, Joy M, Howden B, Barrett G, Stephenson J. Preparation for fatherhood: a survey of men’s preconception health knowledge and behaviour in England. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0213897.

[4] Rabiei Z, Shariati M, Moghabarian N, Tahmasebi R, Ghiasi A, Motaghi Z. Exploring the reproductive health needs of men in the preconception period: a qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2022; 11: 208.

[5] Abed AM. Unlocking the path to healthier families: the untapped potential of men’s preconception health. Journal of Prevention. 2024; 45: 1–8.

[6] Finelli R, Mottola R, Agarwal A. Impact of alcohol consumption on male fertility potential: a narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 19: 328.

[7] Montagnoli C, Ruggeri S, Cinelli G, Tozzi AE, Bovo C, Bortolus R, et al. Anything new about paternal contribution to reproductive outcomes? A review of the evidence. The World Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 39: 626–644.

[8] Kwawukume SAK, Laar AS, Abdulai T. Assessment of men involvement in family planning services use and associated factors in rural Ghana. Archives of Public Health. 2022; 80: 63.

[9] Lau BT, Ng SY, Che-Pa MF, Maarof MF, Subramanian DK, Sallehuddin ZE, et al. Contraceptive intention among postpartum women and willingness for pharmacist counselling in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. Malaysian Journal of Pharmacy. 2022; 8: 19–25.

[10] Roudsari RL, Sharifi F, Gourdarzi F. Barriers to the participation of men in reproductive health care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23: 818.

[11] Kotelchuck M. The impact of father’s health on reproductive and infant health and development. In Grau MG, MLS, Bowles HR (eds.) Engaged fatherhood for men, families and gender equality (pp. 31–61). 1st edn. Springer International Publishing: Cham. 2022.

[12] Pearson L, Holton S, McLachlan R, Hammarberg K. Australian men’s fertility information seeking attitudes and behaviour: a qualitative investigation. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2021; 29: 100621.

[13] Lim MT, Lim YMF, Tong SF, Sivasampu S. Age, sex and primary care setting differences in patients’ perception of community healthcare seeking behaviour towards health services. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0224260.

[14] Bodin M, Käll L, Tydén T, Stern J, Drevin J, Larsson M. Exploring men’s pregnancy-planning behaviour and fertility knowledge: a survey among fathers in Sweden. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017; 122: 127–135.

[15] Maas VYF, Poels M, Stam AL, Lieftink N, Franx A, Koster MPH. Exploring male perceptions regarding the need to engage in preconception care—a mixed-method study amongst Dutch (prospective) fathers. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2022; 27: 322–329.

[16] Ojifinni OO, Ibisomi L. Perception of men’s need for preconception care—a qualitative exploration among health care providers and community members. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 10: 958618.

[17] Goossens J, Van Hecke A, Beeckman D, Verhaeghe S. The intention to make preconception lifestyle changes in men: associated socio-demographic and psychosocial factors. Midwifery. 2019; 73: 8–16.

[18] Bujang MA, Hon YK, Lee K, Yee K. A step-by-step guide to questionnaire validation research. 1st edn. Institute for Clinical Research: Malaysia. 2022.

[19] Vivian WSY, Norhidaya MU, Siti Hamidah H. Measuring the internal consistency and reliability of the hierarchy of controls in preventing infectious disease on construction sites: the Kuder-Richardson (KR-20) and Cronbach’s alpha. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 2023; 33: 392–405.

[20] Ministry of Health Malaysia. Clinical practice guidelines management of obesity. 2nd edn. 2023. Available at: https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/Penerbitan/CPG/Endocrine/CPG_Management_of_Obesity_(Second_Edition)_2023.pdf (Accessed: 09 September 2024).

[21] Al-Akour NA, Sou’Ub R, Mohammad K, Zayed F. Awareness of preconception care among women and men: a study from Jordan. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015; 35: 246–250.

[22] Högberg H, Skagerström J, Spak F, Nilsen P, Larsson M. Alcohol consumption among partners of pregnant women in Sweden: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 694.

[23] Voutilainen T, Rysä J, Keski-Nisula L, Kärkkäinen O. Self-reported alcohol consumption of pregnant women and their partners correlates both before and during pregnancy: a cohort study with 21,472 singleton pregnancies. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2022; 46: 797–808.

[24] Dollar KM, Homish GG, Kozlowski LT, Leonard KE. Spousal and alcohol-related predictors of smoking cessation: a longitudinal study in a community sample of married couples. American Journal of Public Health. 2009; 99: 231–233.

[25] Institute for Public Health, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia. National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019: Technical Report-Volume 1, NCDs-Non Communicable Diseases: Risk Factors and other Health Problems. Putrajaya: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2020; 1: 81–83.

[26] Zamzuri MAIA, Kamarudin SAA, Ariffin AH, Ibrahim AA, Othman MH, Johari A, et al. Rate of smoking cessation and factors associated with successful quit smoking in Seremban District of Malaysia. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2021; 12: 100862.

[27] Greenfield SF, Hufford MR, Vagge LM, Muenz LR, Costello ME, Weiss RD. The relationship of self-efficacy expectancies to relapse among alcohol dependent men and women: a prospective study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2000; 61: 345–351.

[28] De Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P. Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Education Research. 1988; 3: 273–282.

[29] Lowenstein C, Dow WH, White JS. Peer effects in smoking cessation: an instrumental variables analysis of a worksite intervention in Thailand. SSM—Population Health. 2020; 12: 100659.

[30] Blow FC, Walton M, Ilgen M, Ignacio RV, Walters H, Massey L, et al. Peer- and web-based interventions for risky drinking among US National Guard members: mission Strong randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2023; 118: 1246–1257.

[31] Kelly JF, Hoeppner BB. Does alcoholics anonymous work differently for men and women? A moderated multiple-mediation analysis in a large clinical sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2013; 130: 186–193.

[32] Al-Ziadat MA. Do social support and self- efficacy play a significant role in substance use relapse? Health Psychology Research. 2024; 12: 94576.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top