Methods and efficacy of processing testicular sperm samples in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a cornerstone in managing male infertility, especially in obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), necessitating sperm retrieval via testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or microdissection TESE (mTESE). However, the varied post-sperm extraction processing methods pose uncertainty regarding optimal approaches. To address this, a systematic review following preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines was conducted, identifying 16 relevant studies. These studies exhibited significant heterogeneity in methodologies and outcomes, with mechanical preparation and enzymatic digestion being the primary techniques investigated. Mechanical methods, including shredding, mincing, vortexing and crushing, yielded varying sperm counts per 100 mg of tissue, with mincing showing promise in NOA cases. Enzymatic digestion, particularly with collagenase type IV, also showed effectiveness, though inconsistently. Additionally, techniques such as microfluidics and magnetic levitation showed potential for improving sperm retrieval efficiency. However, the lack of standardization in outcomes and reporting impedes the establishment of best practice protocols. While collagenase type IV with elastase seemed promising for OA samples and microfluidics for NOA cases, further studies with standardized methodologies and outcomes are necessary. Assessment of DNA damage and comparisons of ICSI success rates between processing methods are crucial for informed clinical practice. In conclusion, optimizing sperm quantity and quality for ICSI necessitates standardized methodologies and outcomes, with microfluidics and collagenase type IV with elastase showing promise pending further validation through well-designed studies.

Azoospermia; Testicular sperm extraction; Laboratory processing

[1] Haimov-Kochman R, Imbar T, Lossos F, Nefesh I, Zentner BS, Moz Y, et al. Technical modification of testicular sperm extraction expedites testicular sperm retrieval. Fertility and Sterility. 2009; 91: 281–284.

[2] Verheyen G, De Croo I, Tournaye H, Pletincx I, Devroey P, van Steirteghem AC. Comparison of four mechanical methods to retrieve spermatozoa from testicular tissue. Human Reproduction. 1995; 10: 2956–2959.

[3] Elliott PA, Hoffman J, Abad-Santos M, Herndon C, Katz PP, Smith JF. Out-of-pocket costs for men undergoing infertility care and associated financial strain. Urology Practice. 2016; 3: 256–261.

[4] Njagi P, Groot W, Arsenijevic J, Dyer S, Mburu G, Kiarie J. Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Open. 2023; 2023: hoad007.

[5] Biggs SN, Halliday J, Hammarberg K. Psychological consequences of a diagnosis of infertility in men: a systematic analysis. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2024; 26: 10–19.

[6] Braverman AM, Davoudian T, Levin IK, Bocage A, Wodoslawsky S. Depression, anxiety, quality of life, and infertility: a global lens on the last decade of research. Fertility and Sterility. 2024; 121: 379–383.

[7] Fisher JR, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2012; 14: 121–129.

[8] Vloeberghs V, De Munck N, Racca A, Mateizel I, Wouters K, Tournaye H. Enzymatic tissue processing after testicular biopsy in non-obstructive azoospermia enhances sperm retrieval. Human Reproduction Open. 2023; 2023: hoad039.

[9] Vasilescu SA, Khorsandi S, Ding L, Bazaz SR, Nosrati R, Gook D, et al. A microfluidic approach to rapid sperm recovery from heterogeneous cell suspensions. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 7917.

[10] Hozyen M, Hasanen E, Elqusi K, ElTanbouly S, Gamal S, Hussin AG, et al. Reproductive outcomes of different sperm selection techniques for ICSI patients with abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Sciences. 2022; 29: 220–228.

[11] Durmus G, Gupta R, Badamjav O, Reddy V, Eisenberg ML, Behr B, et al. A magnetic levitation platform for the isolation of mature sperm from TESE/TESA samples. Fertility and Sterility. 2018; 109: E26–E27.

[12] Jenkins T, Samuel R, Jafek A, Feng H, Gale B, Carrell DT, et al. Rapid microfluidic sperm isolation from microtese samples in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Fertility and Sterility. 2017; 108: E244.

[13] Ozkavukcu S, Ibis E, Kizil S, Isbacar S, Aydos K. A laboratory modification to testicular sperm preparation technique improves spermatogenic cell yield. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2014; 16: 852–857.

[14] Wober M, Ebner T, Steiner SL, Strohmer H, Oppelt P, Plas E, et al. A new method to process testicular sperm: combining enzymatic digestion, accumulation of spermatozoa, and stimulation of motility. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015; 291: 689–694.

[15] Ramasamy R, Reifsnyder JE, Bryson C, Zaninovic N, Liotta D, Cook CA, et al. Role of tissue digestion and extensive sperm search after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 96: 299–302.

[16] Aydos K, Demirel LC, Baltaci V, Unlü C. Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia cases. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2005; 120: 80–86.

[17] Baukloh V, German Society for Human Reproductive B. Retrospective multicentre study on mechanical and enzymatic preparation of fresh and cryopreserved testicular biopsies. Human Reproduction. 2002; 17: 1788–1794.

[18] Crabbe E, Verheyen G, Silber S, Tournaye H, Van de Velde H, Goossens A, et al. Enzymatic digestion of testicular tissue may rescue the intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle in some patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Human Reproduction. 1998; 13: 2791–2796.

[19] Ostad M, Liotta D, Ye Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia: results of a multibiopsy approach with optimized tissue dispersion. Urology. 1998; 52: 692–696.

[20] Aslam I, Robins A, Dowell K, Fishel S. Isolation, purification and assessment of viability of spermatogenic cells from testicular biopsies of azoospermic men. Human Reproduction. 1998; 13: 639–645.

[21] Crabbe E, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem A. The use of enzymatic procedures to recover testicular germ cells. Human Reproduction. 1997; 12: 1682–1687.