Article Data

  • Views 187
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Exploring decision indicators for selecting elite players in youth male singles badminton: based on anthropometric indicators

  • Eunhye Jo1
  • Sang-Eun Oh2,*,

1Institute of School Physical Education, Korea National University of Education, 28173 Cheongju, Republic of Korea

2Center for Sports and Performance Analytics, Korea National Sport University, 05541 Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.161

Submitted: 23 May 2024 Accepted: 17 July 2024

Online publish date: 17 October 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Sang-Eun Oh E-mail: 302531@knsu.ac.kr

Abstract

This study aims to explore selection indicators for elite male youth singles badminton player based on anthropometric through a Delphi survey. To achieve this, five badminton experts reviewed previous studies and held meetings to derive preliminary indicators. Based on these preliminary indicators, 14 experts conducted two rounds of Delphi surveys. Finally, 13 experts calculated the importance and priority of the indicators derived from the Delphi surveys through an analytic hierarchy process. The results of the study are as follows: first, through a literature review and expert meetings, two primary indicators (physique and motor performance), five secondary indicators (length, circumference, composition, physical strength and coordination ability) and 32 tertiary indicators were constructed to determine the selection criteria for elite players. Second, by conducting two rounds of Delphi surveys, seven sub-indicators for physique (length = 3, circumference = 2, composition = 2), and eight sub-indicators for motor performance (physical strength = 6, coordination ability = 2) were selected. Finally, based on the indicators selected through the Delphi survey, the analytic hierarchy process revealed that height was the top priority for physique (length), followed by thigh circumference for physique (circumference), fat-free mass for physique (composition), agility for motor performance (physical strength) and visual ability for motor performance (coordination ability). These findings can be used as objective indicators to select and evaluate elite young male singles badminton players in future sports settings.


Keywords

Badminton; Selecting elite players; Men’s singles player; Delphi; Analytic hierarchy process


Cite and Share

Eunhye Jo,Sang-Eun Oh. Exploring decision indicators for selecting elite players in youth male singles badminton: based on anthropometric indicators. Journal of Men's Health. 2024.doi:10.22514/jomh.2024.161.

References

[1] Park ME, Park JH. Development of athlete competency evaluation indicators for selecting taekwondo student athletes. The Journal of Korean Alliance of Martial Arts. 2020; 22: 177–187. (In Korean)

[2] Koopmann T, Faber I R, Lath F, Loffing F, Schorer J. Exploring the subjective beliefs of expert coaches on ‘talent’ and player selection in German table tennis. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023; 18: 1952–1963.

[3] Huang H, Lin C, Hu C. Analysis of selection indicators of badminton players by the Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology. 2015; 7: 19–31.

[4] Rogers M, Crozier AJ, Schranz NK, Eston RG, Tomkinson GR. Player profiling and monitoring in basketball: a Delphi study of the most important non-game performance indicators from the perspective of elite athlete coaches. Sports Medicine. 2022; 52: 1175–1187.

[5] Widodo H, Tomoliyus, Alim A. Battery test innovation for table tennis skills: content validity. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2024; 19: 451–460.

[6] Xiang C, Tengku Kamalden TF, Liu H, Ismail N. Exploring the multidisciplinary factors affecting sports talent identification. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 948121.

[7] Zamirovna JV. Methods for selecting junior and cadets athletes by morphofunctional criteria. Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural Science. 2021; 87–91.

[8] Coutinho P, Mesquita I, Fonseca AM. Talent development in sport: a critical review of pathways to expert performance. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2016; 11: 279–293.

[9] Boccia G, Cardinale M, Brustio PR. Performance progression of elite jumpers: early performances do not predict later success. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2021; 31: 132–139.

[10] Albaladejo-Saura M, Vaquero-Cristóbal R, González-Gálvez N, Esparza-Ros F. Relationship between biological maturation, physical fitness, and kinanthropometric variables of young athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 328.

[11] Johnston K, Wattie N, Schorer J, Baker J. Talent identification in sport: a systematic review. Sports Medicine. 2018; 48: 97–109.

[12] Gürsoy H, Canli U. Identification of elite performance characteristics specific to anthropometric characteristics, athletic skills and motor competencies of combat athletes. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2021; 13: 6.

[13] Mala L, Hank M, Stastny P, Zahalka F, Ford KR, Zmijewski P, et al. Elite young soccer players have smaller inter-limb asymmetry and better body composition than non-elite players. Biology of Sport. 2023; 40: 265–272.

[14] Vaz L, Kraak W, Batista M, Honório S, Miguel Fernandes H. Using anthropometric data and physical fitness scores to predict selection in a national U19 rugby union team. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 1499.

[15] Chai JH, Kim HK. Physical fitness and characteristic analysis of Korean national prospective badminton team members stratified by gender and game type. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020; 38: 95–100.

[16] Cabello D, Padial P, Lees A, Rivas F. Temporal and physiological characteristics of elite women’s and men’s singles badminton. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences. 2004; 16: 1–12.

[17] Raman D, Nageswaran AS. Effect of game-specific strength training on selected physiological variables among badminton players. SSB. 2013; 1: 1–2.

[18] Baek SW, Oh DJ, Kim JW. Impact of the type of badminton games on players’ physique and physical strength. The Korea Journal of Sports Science. 2016; 25: 1433–1440.

[19] Sung BJ, Cho KH, Sung E. Comparison of fitness levels based on gender and single and double national badminton player candidate. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science. 2016; 18: 1–12.

[20] Kim DM, Sung BJ. The comparison of physical fitness in game type, game level, and gender difference of the elite high school badminton player. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2021; 60: 639–649. (In Korean)

[21] Heller J. Physiological profiles of elite badminton players: aspects of age and gender. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010; 44: i1–i82.

[22] Wang D, Wang S, Hou J, Yin M. Construction of a sport-specific strength and conditioning evaluation index system for elite male wheelchair badminton athletes by the Delphi method. Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 19: 82–91.

[23] Phomsoupha M, Laffaye G. The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness, and biomechanics. Sports Medicine. 2015; 45: 473–495.

[24] Niederberger M, Spranger J. Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Frontiers in public health. 2020; 8: 457.

[25] Schmalz U, Spinler S, Ringbeck J. Lessons learned from a two-round Delphi-based scenario study. MethodsX. 2021; 8: 101179.

[26] Saaty TL. What is the analytic hierarchy process? Mathematical models for decision support (pp. 109–121). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1988.

[27] McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach for nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1994; 19: 1221–1225.

[28] Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000; 32: 1008–1015.

[29] Roldán López de Hierro AF, Sánchez M, Puente-Fernández D, Montoya-Juárez R, Roldán C. A fuzzy Delphi consensus methodology based on a fuzzy ranking. Mathematics. 2021; 9: 2323.

[30] Franc JM, Hung K, Pirisi A, Weinstein ES. Analysis of Delphi study 7-point linear scale data by parametric methods: use of the mean and standard deviation. Methodological Innovations. 2023; 16: 226–233.

[31] Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method (pp. 3–12). Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA. 1975.

[32] Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28: 563–575.

[33] Sempik J, Aldridge J, Becker S. Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research. Loughborough University: Loughborough, GB. 2003.

[34] Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill: NY. 1980.

[35] Vernon W. The Delphi technique: a review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2009; 16: 69–76.

[36] Dašić DR. Application of Delphi method in sports. Sports, media and business. 2023; 9: 59–71.

[37] Bell DR, Snedden TR, Biese KM, Nelson E, Watson AM, Brooks A, et al. Consensus definition of sport specialization in youth athletes using a Delphi approach. Journal of Athletic Training. 2021; 56: 1239–1251.

[38] Harteis C. Delphi-technique as a method for research on professional learning. In: methods for researching professional learning and development: challenges, applications and empirical illustrations. Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development. 2022; 33: 351–371.

[39] Naisola-Ruiter V. The Delphi technique: a tutorial. Research in Hospitality Management. 2022; 12: 91–97.

[40] Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting. 1999; 15: 353–375.

[41] Olympiandatabase. South Korea in badminton at the Olympics. 2024. Available at: https://www.olympiandatabase.com/index.php?id=148624&L=1 (Accessed: 20 May 2024).

[42] Dev S. Japan’s badminton renaissance under Park Joo-bong. BWF News. 2019. Available at: https://bwfworldchampionships.bwfbadminton.com/news-single/2019/08/14/life-lessons-from-coach-kim-ji-hyun (Accessed: 20 May 2024).

[43] Rajesh P. Park’s last hurrah? The Star. 2024. Available at: https://www.thestar.com.my/sport/badminton/2024/01/07/parks-last-hurrah (Accessed: 20 May 2024).

[44] Laukkanen RM, Virtanen PK. Heart rate monitors: state of the art. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1998; 16: S3–S7.

[45] Kim YJ. The morphological characteristic in badminton players. The Korea Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science. 2001; 3: 45–61. (In Korean)

[46] Singh BB, Singh J. A comparative study on somatotypes of north zone badminton and tennis players. Variorum Multidisciplinary e-Research Journal. 2011; 02: 1–8.

[47] Brandner CF, Harty PS, Luedke JA, Erickson J L, Jagim AR. Sport differences in fat-free mass index among a diverse sample of NCAA Division III collegiate athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2022; 36: 2212–2217.

[48 Akdogan E, Kanat EA, Simsek D, Cerrah AO, Bidil S, Bayram I, et al. Relationship between body composition, multiple repeated sprint ability, and vertical jump performance in elite badminton players. International Journal of Morphology. 2022; 40: 720–727.

[49] Yun YK, Kim WB, Lim TH. Analytic hierarchy process to examine factors influencing sports performance. Korea Journal of Sport Psychology. 2006; 17: 1–11. (In Korean)

[50] Li Q, Ding H. Construction of the structural equation model of badminton players’ variable direction ability and its enlightenment to sports training. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2021; 10: 4623–4631.

[51] Cádiz Gallardo MP, Pradas de la Fuente F, Moreno-Azze A, Carrasco Páez L. Physiological demands of racket sports: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1149295.

[52] Lee YH, Chang J, Lee JE, Jung YS, Lee D, Lee HS. Essential elements of physical fitness analysis in male adolescent athletes using machine learning. PLOS ONE. 2024; 19: e0298870.

[53] Subarkah A, Marani IN, Yulianti E, Widyaningsih H, Jauhari M, Wijayanto A. Physical performance indicators in badminton. Proceedings of the 6th Yogyakarta international seminar on health, physical education, and sports science (YISHPESS 2023). 2023. Available at: https://yishpess.uny.ac.id/ (Accessed: 20 May 2024).

[54] Robertson K, Laureys F, Mostaert M, Pion J, Deconinck FJA, Lenoir M. Mind, body, and shuttle: multidimensional benchmarks for talent identification in male youth badminton. Biology of Sport. 2022; 39: 79–94.

[55] Bidil S, Arslan B, Bozkurt K, Düzova SC, Örs BS, Onarici Güngör E, et al. Investigation of the effect of badminton-specific 8 week reaction training on visual-motor reaction time and visual cognitive dual task. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021; 13: 33–40.

[56] Prak MSAL, Abdullah B, Zulkifly NA, Farizan NH, Samsudin S. Effects of visual training on the reaction time among badminton athletes. ACPES Journal of Physical Education, Sport, and Health. 2022; 2: 120–129.

[57] Shim J, Carlton LG, Chow JW, Chae WS. The use of anticipatory visual cues by highly skilled tennis players. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2005; 37: 164–175.

[58] Chen Y, Zulnaidi H, Syed Ali SKB. Study on the eye movement characteristics of the badminton practitioners of different levels regarding visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 13: 1026006.

[59] Loureiro Jr. LDFB, Freitas PBD. Influence of the performance level in badminton players in neuromotor aspects during a target-pointing task. Brazilian Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012; 18: 203–207.

[60] Poliszczuk T, Mosakowska M. Interactions of peripheral perception and ability of time-movement anticipation in high class competitive badminton players. Studies in physical Culture & Tourism. 2009; 16: 259–265.

[61] Korean Sport & Olympic Committee. National team selection and operation regulations. 2021. Available at: http://www.koreabadminton.org/Info/constitution.asp (Accessed: 20 May 2024)


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top