Article Data

  • Views 413
  • Dowloads 132

Original Research

Open Access

Comparative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and their combination for adrenal tumor diagnosis in men

  • Minghui Yan1
  • Yanan Wang1
  • Lianghong Jiao1,*,

1Medical Imaging Center, Ningbo Yinzhou No.2 Hospital, 315192 Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.115 Vol.20,Issue 7,July 2024 pp.113-119

Submitted: 22 February 2024 Accepted: 19 June 2024

Published: 30 July 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Lianghong Jiao E-mail: lh_jiao0221@163.com

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), dynamic contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and their combination in diagnosing adrenal tumors. 68 patients with adrenal tumors admitted to the hospital from December 2019 to December 2020 were selected. MRI and CT plain scans were performed on all patients, as well as dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. As the gold standard for evaluating diagnostic efficacy, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and their combination were compared with pathological examination results. To compare diagnostic method differences, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. MRI contour rates at each delay point were significantly higher in adenoma patients than non-adenoma patients (p < 0.05). CT contour rates at each delay point were also significantly higher in adenoma patients than non-adenoma patients (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value of the combined diagnostic examination were significantly higher than individual examinations (p < 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and the combined diagnostic had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.818 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.696–0.940), 0.827 (95% CI: 0.706–0.949), and 0.908 (95% CI: 0.769–1.019), respectively. The combined diagnosis showed the largest AUC with significant differences (p < 0.05). The overall model quality analysis showed that the model values of single and combined indicators were greater than 0.5, and the highest value of the combined index was 0.80. In summary, the combination of dynamic-enhanced CT and dynamic-enhanced MRI is more effective at diagnosing adrenal tumors than either technique alone. Combination diagnoses can assist in diagnosing and treating adrenal tumors with high clinical application value.


Keywords

Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Combined examination; Adrenal tumor; Diagnostic efficacy


Cite and Share

Minghui Yan,Yanan Wang,Lianghong Jiao. Comparative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and their combination for adrenal tumor diagnosis in men. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(7);113-119.

References

[1] Jing Y, Hu JB, Luo R, Mao Y, Luo ZX, Zhang MJ, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of adrenal tumors in an unselected screening population a cross-sectional study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2022; 175: 1383–1391.

[2] Prete A, Subramanian A, Bancos I, Chortis V, Tsagarakis S, Lang K, et al. Cardiometabolic disease burden and steroid excretion in benign adrenal tumors a cross-sectional multicenter study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2022; 175: 325–334.

[3] Schaafsma M, Berends AMA, Links TP, Brouwers AH, Kerstens MN. The diagnostic value of F-FDG PET/CT scan in characterizing adrenal tumors. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2023; 108: 2435–2445.

[4] Mueller JW, Vogg N, Lightning TA, Weigand I, Ronchi CL, Foster PA, et al. Steroid sulfation in adrenal tumors. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021; 106: 3385–3397.

[5] Fassnacht M, Tsagarakis S, Terzolo M, Tabarin A, Sahdev A, Newell-Price J, et al. European society of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenal incidentalomas, in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2023; 189: G1–G42.

[6] Cui X, Hu D, Wang C, Chen S, Zhao Z, Xu X, et al. A surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based probe method for detecting chromogranin a in adrenal tumors. Nanomedicine. 2020; 15: 397–407.

[7] Okamoto K, Ohno Y, Sone M, Inagaki N, Ichijo T, Yoneda T, et al. Should adrenal venous sampling be performed in PA patients without apparent adrenal tumors? Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021; 12: 645395.

[8] Nermoen I, Falhammar H. Prevalence and characteristics of adrenal tumors and myelolipomas in congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine Practice. 2020; 26: 1351–1365.

[9] Araujo-Castro M, Pascual-Corrales E, García Cano AM, Marchan M, Casals G, Hanzu FA, et al. Evaluation of body composition in patients with and without adrenal tumors and without overt hypersecretory syndromes. Endocrine Practice. 2023; 29: 110–118.

[10] Zeng H, Wang X, Li H, Yang Q. Quantitative analysis of catecholamines and their metabolites in 491 patients with adrenal tumors: a retrospective single-center cohort study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2023; 149: 4979–4989.

[11] Ku EJ, Lee C, Shim J, Lee S, Kim KA, Kim SW, et al. Metabolic subtyping of adrenal tumors: prospective multi-center cohort study in Korea. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021; 36: 1131–1141.

[12] Rees MA, Morin CE, Behr GG, Davis JC, Lai H, Morani AC, et al. Imaging of pediatric adrenal tumors: a COG diagnostic imaging committee/SPR oncology committee white paper. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2023; 70: e29973.

[13] Ambroziak U. Approach to large adrenal tumors. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity. 2021; 28: 271–276.

[14] Cambos S, Chanson P, Tabarin A. Analysis of steroid profiles by mass spectrometry: a new tool for exploring adrenal tumors? Annales d’Endocrinologie. 2021; 82: 36–42.

[15] Ma GY, Zhang XJ, Wang MS, Xu XD, Xu BX, Guan ZW. Role of F-FDG PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of primary benign and malignant unilateral adrenal tumors. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2021; 11: 2013–2018.

[16] Alimu P, Fang C, Han Y, Dai J, Xie C, Wang J, et al. Artificial intelligence with a deep learning network for the quantification and distinction of functional adrenal tumors based on contrast-enhanced CT images. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2023; 13: 2675–2687.

[17] Zdrojewska M, Mech-Siebieszuk E, Swiatkowska-Stodulska R, Regent B, Kunc M, Zdrojewski L, et al. Adrenal tumors in young adults: case reports and literature review. Medicina. 2022; 58: 746.

[18] Yanagisawa M, Malik DG, Loehfelm TW, Fananapazir G, Corwin MT, Campbell MJ. Adrenal tumors found during staging and surveillance for colorectal cancer: benign incidentalomas or metastatic disease? World Journal of Surgery. 2020; 44: 2282–2287.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top