Article Data

  • Views 481
  • Dowloads 147

Original Research

Open Access

Effects of foam rolling and static stretching training in youth soccer players with hip joint range of motion restriction

  • Gaofei Zhang1
  • Yonghwan Kim2,*,
  • Moonyoung Choi3,*,

1Physical Education College, Zhoukou Normal University, 466000 Zhoukou, Henan, China

2Department of Physical Education, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 25457 Gangneung, Republic of Korea

3Department of Sports Science Convergence, Dongguk University, 04620 Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.114 Vol.20,Issue 7,July 2024 pp.104-112

Submitted: 07 March 2024 Accepted: 02 April 2024

Published: 30 July 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Yonghwan Kim E-mail: yhkim@gwnu.ac.kr
*Corresponding Author(s): Moonyoung Choi E-mail: dory0301@dongguk.edu

Abstract

Hip range of motion (ROM) restriction is commonly observed in youth soccer players. This study aimed to investigate the effects of foam rolling training (FRT) and static stretching training (SST) on youth soccer players who have restricted hip ROM. The study included 34 youth soccer players with hip ROM restrictions, who were divided into two groups: FRT (n = 17, 15.9 ± 1.3 years) and SST (n = 17, 15.9 ± 1.7 years). Both groups were diagnosed with hip ROM restriction and enrolled in the study, then performed foam rolling and static stretching programs three times a week for six weeks. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), and hip ROM, Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ), and isokinetic hip strength test were measured before and after intervention. The results showed that both FRT and SST were effective in improving hip function, as measured by HAGOS, and in increasing hip ROM, particularly flexion, abduction and internal rotation (p < 0.05). External rotation was significantly increased only in the SST group (p < 0.05). Both FRT and SST also improved YBT-LQ (p < 0.05). However, the SST group showed higher reach distances than the FRT group in all directions after training (p < 0.05). Both groups improved isokinetic hip strength in flexion and abduction movements, but when compared between groups, the FRT group showed greater improvement in peak torque (p < 0.05). In conclusion, FRT was more effective in reducing symptoms and pain and improving muscle strength, while SST improved hip mobility and dynamic balance more broadly. These results suggest that including both foam rolling and static stretching in a training program to optimize hip ROM and function in youth soccer players may be effective.


Keywords

Football; Mobility; Restriction; Foam rolling; Static stretching; Dynamic balance; Strength; Adolescents


Cite and Share

Gaofei Zhang,Yonghwan Kim,Moonyoung Choi. Effects of foam rolling and static stretching training in youth soccer players with hip joint range of motion restriction. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(7);104-112.

References

[1] Luo S, Soh KG, Zhang L, Zhai X, Sunardi J, Gao Y, et al. Effect of core training on skill-related physical fitness performance among soccer players: a systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 10: 1046456–1046469.

[2] AlTaweel A, Nuhmani S, Ahsan M, Abualait T, Muaidi Q. Determining the hip joint isokinetic muscle strength and range of motion of professional soccer players based on their field position. PeerJ. 2022; 10: e14000–e14013.

[3] Hölbling D, Baca A, Dabnichki P. A kinematic model for assessment of hip joint range-of-motion in fast sport movements using spreading angles. Sports Biomechanics. 2023; 22: 1243–1255.

[4] de Castro JV, Machado KC, Scaramussa K, Gomes JLE. Incidence of decreased hip range of motion in youth soccer players and response to a stretching program: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2013; 22: 100–107.

[5] García-Pinillos F, Ruiz-Ariza A, Moreno del Castillo R, Latorre-Román PÁ. Impact of limited hamstring flexibility on vertical jump, kicking speed, sprint, and agility in young football players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015; 33: 1293–1297.

[6] Robles-Palazón FJ, Ayala F, Cejudo A, De Ste Croix M, Sainz de Baranda P, Santonja F. Effects of age and maturation on lower extremity range of motion in male youth soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022; 36: 1417–1425.

[7] Angoorani H, Karaminia E, Mazaherinezhad A, Hassanmirzaei B, Moghadam N. Correlation of hip passive range of motion with lower limbs injuries in iranian professional soccer players. Journal of Clinical Physiotherapy Research. 2021; 6: e34–e41.

[8] Tak I, Engelaar L, Gouttebarge V, Barendrecht M, Van den Heuvel S, Kerkhoffs G, et al. Is lower hip range of motion a risk factor for groin pain in athletes? A systematic review with clinical applications. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017; 51: 1611–1621.

[9] Hogg JA, Waxman JP, Shultz SJ. Examining the effects of femoral anteversion and passive hip rotation on ACL injury and knee biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. 2022; 9: 40.

[10] Malina RM, Rogol AD, Cumming SP, Coelho e Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ. Biological maturation of youth athletes: assessment and implications. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015; 49: 852–859.

[11] Chaari F, Boyas S, Sahli S, Fendri T, Harrabi MA, Rebai H, et al. Postural balance asymmetry and subsequent noncontact lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries among Tunisian soccer players with groin pain: a prospective case control study. Gait & Posture. 2022; 98: 134–140.

[12] Markovic G. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization vs. foam rolling on knee and hip range of motion in soccer players. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2015; 19: 690–696.

[13] Nakamura M, Onuma R, Kiyono R, Yasaka K, Sato S, Yahata K, et al. The acute and prolonged effects of different durations of foam rolling on range of motion, muscle stiffness, and muscle strength. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2021; 20: 62–68.

[14] Takeuchi K, Nakamura M, Konrad A, Mizuno T. Long‐term static stretching can decrease muscle stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2023; 33: 1294–1306.

[15] Siebert T, Donath L, Borsdorf M, Stutzig N. Effect of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and myofascial foam rolling on range of motion during hip flexion: a randomized crossover trial. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022; 36: 680–685.

[16] Yanaoka T, Yoshimura A, Iwata R, Fukuchi M, Hirose N. The effect of foam rollers of varying densities on range of motion recovery. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2021; 26: 64–71.

[17] Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM. The copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011; 45: 478–491.

[18] Thomeé R, Jónasson P, Thorborg K, Sansone M, Ahldén M, Thomeé C, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish and validation of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with hip and groin disability due to femoro-acetabular impingement. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014; 22: 835–842.

[19] Yazdifar M, Yazdifar MR, Mahmud J, Esat I, Chizari M. Evaluating the hip range of motion using the goniometer and video tracking methods. Procedia Engineering. 2013; 68: 77–82.

[20] Bennett H, Chalmers S, Milanese S, Fuller J. The association between Y-balance test scores, injury, and physical performance in elite adolescent Australian footballers. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2022; 25: 306–311.

[21] Hannon JP, Wang-Price S, Garrison JC, Goto S, Bothwell JM, Bush CA. Normalized hip and knee strength in two age groups of adolescent female soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022; 36: 207–211.

[22] Bayles MP. ACSM’s exercise testing and prescription. 2nd edn. Lippincott williams & wilkins: Philadelphia. 2023.

[23] Konrad A, Nakamura M, Paternoster FK, Tilp M, Behm DG. A comparison of a single bout of stretching or foam rolling on range of motion in healthy adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2022; 122: 1545–1557.

[24] Junker DH, Stöggl TL. The foam roll as a tool to improve hamstring flexibility. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015; 29: 3480–3485.

[25] Hinks A, Franchi MV, Power GA. The influence of longitudinal muscle fascicle growth on mechanical function. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2022; 133: 87–103.

[26] Panidi I, Donti O, Konrad A, Dinas PC, Terzis G, Mouratidis A, et al. Muscle architecture adaptations to static stretching training: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine-Open. 2023; 9: 47–73.

[27] Chang TT, Li Z, Zhu YC, Wang XQ, Zhang ZJ. Effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on the stiffness of the gastrocnemius-achilles tendon complex and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021; 12: 718827–718835.

[28] Shah R, Samuel MW, Son J. Acute and chronic effects of static stretching on neuromuscular properties: a meta-analytical review. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13: 11979–112009.

[29] Trajano GS, Blazevich AJ. Static stretching reduces motoneuron excitability: the potential role of neuromodulation. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2021; 49: 126–132.

[30] Konrad A, Tilp M. Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures. Clinical Biomechanics. 2014; 29: 636–642.

[31] Schroeder J, Wilke J, Hollander K. Effects of foam rolling duration on tissue stiffness and perfusion: a randomized cross-over trial. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2021; 20: 626–634.

[32] Amiri-Khorasani M, Sahebozamani M, Tabrizi KG, Yusof AB. Acute effect of different stretching methods on Illinois agility test in soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010; 24: 2698–2704.

[33] Nakagawa TH, Petersen RS. Relationship of hip and ankle range of motion, trunk muscle endurance with knee valgus and dynamic balance in males. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2018; 34: 174–179.

[34] Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL, Greenberg MD, Rogers SM, Koreerat CM, et al. Clinical measures associated with dynamic balance and functional movement. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2014; 28: 1272–1283.

[35] Hendricks S, Hill H, Hollander SD, Lombard W, Parker R. Effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery: a systematic review of the literature to guide practitioners on the use of foam rolling. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2020; 24: 151–174.

[36] Glänzel MH, Rodrigues DR, Petter GN, Pozzobon D, Vaz MA, Geremia JM. Foam rolling acute effects on myofascial tissue stiffness and muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2023; 37: 951–968.

[37] Stone MH, Hornsby WG, Suarez DG, Duca M, Pierce KC. Training specificity for athletes: emphasis on strength-power training: a narrative review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2022; 7: 102–120.

[38] Nakao S, Ikezoe T, Nakamura M, Umegaki H, Fujita K, Umehara J, et al. Chronic effects of a static stretching program on hamstring strength. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2021; 35: 1924–1929.

[39] Lee C, Chu I, Lyu B, Chang W, Chang N. Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and balance in young adults. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2018; 36: 2575–2582.

[40] Bowman KF, Fox J, Sekiya JK. A clinically relevant review of hip biomechanics. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2010; 26: 1118–1129.

[41] Henriksen M, Rosager S, Aaboe J, Graven-Nielsen T, Bliddal H. Experimental knee pain reduces muscle strength. The Journal of Pain. 2011; 12: 460–467.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top