Is it real or just for show? Construction and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of egalitarian masculinities (QAEM-27)

In recent years, there has been significant interest in studying masculinities in relation to the advancements of feminism. However, there are currently no measurement instruments available to assess the extent to which men hold egalitarian attitudes and practices concerning gender equality. Consequently, it is imperative to conduct research on masculinities and gender equality to evaluate the efficacy of interventions designed to cultivate egalitarian attitudes and behaviors among men. Hence, this study aims to develop and authenticate a questionnaire, namely the Questionnaire for Assessing Egalitarian Masculinities (QAEM-27), that can effectively measure such progress. The sample consisted of 195 adult Spanish men with an average age of 40 years. After conducting a sequence of exploratory factor analyses, we suggest a definitive questionnaire consisting of 27 items that are categorized into six distinct dimensions:(1) Awareness of sexism, (2) Co-responsibility, (3) Pro-egalitarian practices, (4) Non-exercise of violence, (5) Male privileges, and (6) Egalitarian relationships. The reliability coefficients of these dimensions were deemed satisfactory, as evidenced by Cronbach’s alpha (0.72 to 0.92) and McDonalds’ Omega (0.74 to 0.92). Additionally, the Average Extraction Variance analyses conducted support the proposed scale’s reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. These findings suggest that this questionnaire is a valuable tool for researching egalitarian masculinities in both academic and practical settings, thereby advancing our understanding of this field of study.

Egalitarian masculinities; Questionnaire; Psychometric evaluation; Gender equality

[1] Roberts S, Elliott K. Challenging dominant representations of marginalized boys and men in critical studies on men and masculinities. Boyhood Studies. 2020; 13: 87–104.

[2] Uribe Roncallo P. Alternative masculinities. Men giving a narrative account beyond the hegemonic model and generate change through education. Latin American Journal of Inclusive Education. 2020; 14: 115–129. (In Spanish)

[3] de Keijzer B, Cuellar AC, Valenzuela Mayorga A, Hommes C, Caffe S, Mendoza F, et al. Masculinities and men's health in the Region of the Americas. Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2022; 46: e93. (In Spanish)

[4] Ministerio de Sanidad. Mortality patterns in Spain. 2017. Available at: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/estadisticas/estMinisterio/mortalidad/docs/Patrones_Mortalidad_2017.pdf (Accessed: 10-09-2023).

[5] Tseole NP, Vermaak K. Exploring the influences of hegemonic and complicit masculinity on lifestyle risk factors for noncommunicable diseases among adult men in Maseru, Lesotho. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2020; 14: 1557988320958931.

[6] López-Ramos A, Cifre-Gallego E. Men and the feminist agenda, why do men care about gender equality? A qualitative study with experts on the reasons that motivate change in masculinities. Cuestiones de Género. 2023; 18: 275–297. (In Spanish)

[7] Duncanson C. Hegemonic masculinity and the possibility of change in gender relations. Men and Masculinities. 2015; 18: 231–248.

[8] Friedman S. Still a “stalled revolution”? Work/family experiences, hegemonic masculinity, and moving toward gender equality. Sociology Compass. 2015; 9: 140–155.

[9] Boscán Leal A. New positive masculinities. Utopia and Latin American Praxis. 2008; 13: 93–106. (In Spanish)

[10] Bonino L. Pro-feminist, anti-sexist and egalitarian men’s movement. 2003. Available at: http://www.hombresigualdad.com/hprofe-anti-lbonino.htm. (Accessed: 05 July 2023).

[11] EJD Gutiérrez, HD Tascón. Egalitarian men and new masculinity. La Manzana. 2008; 3. (In Spanish)

[12] Kaplan D, Rosenmann A, Shuhendler S. What about Nontraditional Masculinities? Toward a quantitative model of therapeutic new masculinity ideology. Men and Masculinities. 2017; 20: 393–426.

[13] Anderson E. Inclusive Masculinity: the changing nature of masculinities. 1st edn. Routledge: New York. 2009.

[14] López-Ramos A, Cifre-Gallego E, Hernández-Baeza A. A proposal for a quantitative assessment of masculinities. In: II Congreso Internacional sobre masculinidades e igualdad: educación para la igualdad y co(educación). 2023. Available at: https://editorial.umh.es/2023/02/06/ii-congreso-internacional-sobre-masculinidades-e-igualdad-educacion-para-la-igualdad-y-coeducacion/. (Accessed: 10 August 2023).

[15] Sudkämper A, Ryan MK, Kirby TA, Morgenroth T. A comprehensive measure of attitudes and behaviour: development of the support for gender equality among men scale. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2020; 50: 256–277.

[16] Abreu H, Rosas-Torres AR, Álvaro-Estramiana JL. Egalitarian men: stereotypes and discrimination in the labour market. Colombian Act of Psychology. 2020; 23: 111–128.

[17] Hernández A, Drasgow F, González-Romá V. Investigating the functioning of a middle category by means of a mixed-measurement model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004; 89: 687–699.

[18] Hernández A, Espejo B, González-Romá V. The functioning of central categories Middle Level and Sometimes in graded response scales: does the label matter? Psicothema. 2006; 18: 300–306.

[19] Cornejo-Valle M, Ramme J, Barrera-Blanco J. The anti-gender agenda against sexual and reproductive rights: differential contexts in the cases of Spain and Poland. Cuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia. 2023; 18: 174–194. (In Spanish)

[20] Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernandez-Baeza A, Tomas I. Exploratory item factor analysis: a practical guide revised and updated. Annals of Psychology. 2014; 30: 1151–1169. (In Spanish)

[21] Watkins MW. Exploratory factor analysis: a guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology. 2018; 44: 219–246.

[22] Izquierdo I, Olea J, Abad FJ. Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: uses and recommendations. Psicothema. 2014; 26: 395–400.

[23] Flora DB, Labrish C, Chalmers RP. Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2012; 3: 55.

[24] Ferrando Piera P J, Lorenzo Seva U. Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions. Psicothema. 2017; 29: 236–240.

[25] Schreiber JB. Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2021; 17: 1004–1011.

[26] Sánchez Escobedo P. Factors associated with the socioemotional well-being of cognitively endowed students in Mexico. International Journal of Development and Educational Psychology. 2022; 1: 193–200.

[27] Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; 6: 1–55.

[28] Lai K, Green SB. The problem with having two watches: assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2016; 51: 220–239.

[29] Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen KA, Long JS (Eds.) Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, California,1993.

[30] Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2002; 9: 233–255.

[31] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18: 39–50.

[32] Pahlke E, Bigler RS, Martin CL. Can fostering children’s ability to challenge sexism improve critical analysis, internalization, and enactment of inclusive, egalitarian peer relationships? Journal of Social Issues. 2014; 70: 115–133.

[33] Estevan Reina L, de Lemus S, Megías JL. Feminist or paternalistic: understanding men’s motivations to confront sexism. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; 10: 1–15.

[34] Verbal V. The ideology of the “gender ideology”. Understanding a conservative reaction. Femeris. 2022; 7: 56–74.

[35] Cabezas Fernández M, Pichel-Vázquez A, Enguix Grau B. The “anti-gender” framework and the Spanish (ultra) right. Focus groups with vox and Partido popular voters. Journal of Social Studies. 2023; 85: 97–114. (In Spanish)

[36] Lamont E. The limited construction of an egalitarian masculinity. Men and Masculinities. 2015; 18: 271–292.

[37] Harnois CE. Intersectional masculinities and gendered political consciousness: how do race, ethnicity and sexuality shape men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for gender activism? Sex Roles. 2017; 77: 141–154.

[38] García-Jiménez M, Cala-Carrillo MJ, Trigo-Sánchez ME. Knowledge and attitudes toward feminism. Femeris. 2016; 1: 95–112.

[39] Feuerstahler L, Wilson M. Scale alignment in the between-item multidimensional partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2021; 45: 268–282.

[40] Zumbo BD, Chan EK. Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. Social Indicators Research Series, Vol. 54. Springer International Publishing: Cham. 2014; 157–174.

[41] Safdar S, Kosakowska-Berezecka N. Psychology of gender through the lens of culture: theories and applications. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. 2015.