Article Data

  • Views 401
  • Dowloads 115

Original Research

Open Access

Analysis of short-term outcome indicators and risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with sigmoid colon cancer by transumbilical single-port plus one port laparoscopy

  • Wenju Liu1
  • Shengyuan Liu1,*,
  • Weidong Zang1
  • Meimei Chen1

1Department of gastrointestinal surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, 350014 Fuzhou, Fujian, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.026 Vol.20,Issue 2,February 2024 pp.111-119

Submitted: 31 October 2023 Accepted: 18 December 2023

Published: 29 February 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Shengyuan Liu E-mail: liushengyuan05@163.com

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Single-Port plus One Port Laparoscopy (SILS + 1) with Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Surgery (CLS) and investigate risk factors associated with postoperative complications in patients with sigmoid colon cancer undergoing laparoscopy. Male patients with sigmoid colon cancer treated at our hospital were selected and evenly distributed into the CLS and SILS + 1 groups and further categorized into complication and non-complication groups based on their complications status within 30 days post-surgery. Compared to the CLS group, the SILS+ 1 group had significantly shorter incision length, greater distance to the lower edge of the tumor and shorter time to first postoperative ambulation (p < 0.05). A total of 20 cases (16.67%) developed complications within 30 days post-surgery, and among them, 8 (13.33%) were in the SILS + 1 group and 12 (20.00%) in the CLS group (p = 0.327). Logistic multivariable regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.028; Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003–1.054), body mass index (BMI)(p = 0.002; OR = 1.950; 95% CI: 1.248–2.961) and operation time (p < 0.001; OR = 1.067; 95% CI: 1.030–1.106) were independent risk factors for complication occurrence within 30 days post-surgery, and at 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in overall survival between both groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, age, BMI and duration of surgery were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative complications in male sigmoid colon cancer patients, among whom SILS + 1 was found to reduce postoperative discomfort and accelerate recovery compared to CLS while maintaining surgical efficacy.


Keywords

Sigmoid colon cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery; Postoperative complications; Risk factors


Cite and Share

Wenju Liu,Shengyuan Liu,Weidong Zang,Meimei Chen. Analysis of short-term outcome indicators and risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with sigmoid colon cancer by transumbilical single-port plus one port laparoscopy. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(2);111-119.

References

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018; 68: 394–424.

[2] Simillis C, Lal N, Thoukididou SN, Kontovounisios C, Smith JJ, Hompes R, et al. Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic versus transanal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery. 2019; 270: 59–68.

[3] Al-Ameri M, Persson M, Bergman P, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: survival and prognostic factors. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018; 10: 3372–3380.

[4] Kawahara H, Watanabe K, Ushigome T, Noaki R, Kobayashi S, Yanaga K. Umbilical incision laparoscopic surgery with one assist port for anterior resection. Digestive Surgery. 2010; 27: 364–366.

[5] Hirano Y, Hiranuma C, Hattori M, Douden K, Yamaguchi S. Single-incision or single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surgical Technology International. 2020; 36: 132–135.

[6] Mocan L. Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colon cancer: the new standard? European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2021; 25: 4228–4235.

[7] Aoyama T, Oba K, Honda M, Muto M, Mayanagi S, Maeda H, et al. The clinical impacts of postoperative complications after colon cancer surgery for the clinical course of adjuvant treatment and survival. International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023; 28: 777–784.

[8] Granero L, Cienfuegos JA, Baixauli J, Pastor C, Sánchez Justicia C, Valentí V, et al. Predictive risk factors for postoperative complications and its impact on survival in laparoscopic resection for colon cancer. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2021; 31: 558–564.

[9] Bond MR, Pilowsky I. Subjective assessment of pain and its relationship to the administration of analgesics in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1966; 10: 203–208.

[10] Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA. Laparoscopic appendectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery. 1995; 5: 419–420.

[11] Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2008; 23: 1013–1016.

[12] Zhang H, Ling Y, Cong J, Cui M, Liu D, Chen C. Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016; 14: 275.

[13] Kawamura H, Tanioka T, Shibuya K, Tahara M, Takahashi M. Comparison of the invasiveness between reduced-port laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. International Surgery. 2013; 98: 247–253.

[14] Yu H, Shin JY. Short-term outcomes following reduced-port, single-port, and multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: tailored laparoscopic approaches based on tumor size and nodal status. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2016; 31: 115–122.

[15] Liu R, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Li T, Liu H, Zhao L, et al. Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017; 31: 2437–2450.

[16] Kang JH, Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim HR, Kwak HD, Ju JK, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional multiport surgery in colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research. 2018; 94: 147.

[17] Tokuoka M, Ide Y, Takeda M, Hashimoto Y, Matsuyama J, Yokoyama S, et al. Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and bilateral pelvic node dissection for advanced rectal cancer—a medial umbilical ligament approach. International Surgery. 2015; 100: 417–422.

[18] Chuang S, Chuang S. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery to treat hepatopancreatobiliary cancer: a technical review. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 28: 3359–3369.

[19] Stormark K, Søreide K, Søreide JA, Kvaløy JT, Pfeffer F, Eriksen MT, et al. Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort. Surgical Endoscopy. 2016; 30: 4853–4864.

[20] Cone MM. Dramatic decreases in mortality from laparoscopic colon resections based on data from the nationwide inpatient sample. Archives of Surgery. 2011; 146: 594–599.

[21] Kang BM, Kim HJ, Kye B, Lee SC, Lee KY, Park SJ, et al. Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 2018; 32: 1540–1549.

[22] Yun J, Yun SH, Park YA, Huh JW, Cho YB, Kim HC, et al. Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colon cancer. Annals of Surgery. 2016; 263: 973–978.

[23] Watanabe J, Ota M, Fujii S, Suwa H, Ishibe A, Endo I. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy. The British Journal of Surgery. 2016; 103: 1276–1281.

[24] Pak H, Maghsoudi LH, Soltanian A, Gholami F. Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020; 55: 13–18.

[25] Baidoun F, Elshiwy K, Elkeraie Y, Merjaneh Z, Khoudari G, Sarmini MT, et al. Colorectal cancer epidemiology: recent trends and impact on outcomes. Current Drug Targets. 2021; 22: 998–1009.

[26] Dewulf M, Kalmar A, Vandenberk B, Muysoms F, Defoort B, Claeys D, et al. Complete mesocolic excision does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies: a comparative retrospective single-center study. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2019; 404: 557–564.

[27] Yi X, Lu X, Li H, Wang W, Xiong W, Wan J, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision using an ‘artery-first’ approach. Gastroenterology Report. 2019; 7: 199–204.

[28] Reibetanz J, Germer CT. Increased rate of intraoperative complications after complete mesocolic excision. Der Chirurg. 2019; 90: 55. (In German)

[29] Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF, Wouters MWJM, Menon AG, Kleinrensink G, et al. Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2018; 61: 1258–1266.

[30] Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer. Annals of Surgery. 2015; 262: 321–330.

[31] Prevost GA, Odermatt M, Furrer M, Villiger P. Postoperative morbidity of complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation in right colectomy: a retrospective comparative cohort study. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2018; 16: 214.

[32] Wang J, Johnson NW, Casey L, Carne PWG, Bell S, Chin M, et al. Robotic colon surgery in obese patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2023; 93: 35–41.

[33] Hida K, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, Kuroyanagi H, Nagayama S, Tada H, et al. Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients: experience of 401 cases at a single institution. World Journal of Surgery. 2009; 33: 1733–1740.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top