The potential of mobile health applications to improve couples' fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the safety and effectiveness of mobile health applications in couples with infertility. Nineteen databases were searched from their inception to August 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which mobile health was used as an intervention in infertile couples were included. A quantitative analysis of RCTs was employed using RevMan software. Study selection, data extraction and validation were performed by two independent reviewers according to the guidelines. The Cochrane criteria for risk-of-bias were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the trials. Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Among the eight RCTs, two RCTs were from the Netherlands and the remaining six RCTs were from China. Meta-analysis showed that mobile health interventions in infertile couples in China were found to be superior to usual care in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (p = 0.001), psychological status (SAS (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale): p < 0.001; SDS (Self-Rating Depression Scale) p < 0.001;), infertility knowledge levels (p < 0.001), quality of life (p < 0.001), and serum levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (p < 0.001). The effects on intervention groups using mobile health interventions in the Netherlands were not superior to the control groups that used usual care in terms of improving dietary factors (p > 0.05). In general, the positive effect of mobile health on improving clinical pregnancy rate, psychological status, infertility knowledge levels, quality of life and satisfaction with information was better than that of usual care. Mobile health interventions could be a viable supplement to the usual care for infertile couples. However, more high-quality RCTs need to be included in the future to provide additional evidence of the positive effects of mobile health in infertile couples.

Mobile health; Infertility; Systematic review

[1] Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Human Reproduction. 2017; 32: 1786–1801.

[2] Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Medicine. 2012; 9: e1001356.

[3] Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduction. 2007; 22: 1506–1512.

[4] Wang J, Sauer MV. In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of 3 decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2006; 2: 355–364.

[5] De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. ART in Europe, 2015: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reproduction Open. 2020; 2020: hoz038.

[6] Kissin DM, Boulet SL, Jamieson DJ. Fertility treatments in the United States: improving access and outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 128: 387–390.

[7] Wyns C, Bergh C, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, Motrenko T, et al. ART in Europe, 2016: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reproduction Open. 2020; 2020: hoaa032.

[8] De Neubourg D, Bogaerts K, Blockeel C, Coetsier T, Delvigne A, Devreker F, et al. How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries? Human Reproduction. 2016; 31: 93–99.

[9] Barrière P, Avril C, Benmahmoud-Zoubir A, Bénard N, Dejager S. Patient perceptions and understanding of treatment instructions for ovarian stimulation during infertility treatment. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online. 2019; 9: 37–47.

[10] Mourad SM, Hermens RPMG, Cox-Witbraad T, Grol RPTM, Nelen WLDM, Kremer JAM. Information provision in fertility care: a call for improvement. Human Reproduction. 2009; 24: 1420–1426.

[11] Gameiro S, Boivin J, Domar A. Optimal in vitro fertilization in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertility and Sterility. 2013; 100: 302–309.

[12] Gameiro S, Boivin J, Dancet E, de Klerk C, Emery M, Lewis-Jones C, et al. ESHRE guideline: routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction-a guide for fertility staff. Human Reproduction. 2015; 30: 2476–2485.

[13] Van Dijk MR, Huijgen NA, Willemsen SP, Laven JS, Steegers EA, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Impact of an mHealth platform for pregnancy on nutrition and lifestyle of the reproductive population: a survey. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2016; 4: e53.

[14] van Dijk MR, Koster MPH, Willemsen SP, Huijgen NA, Laven JSE, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. Healthy preconception nutrition and lifestyle using personalized mobile health coaching is associated with enhanced pregnancy chance. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2017; 35: 453–460.

[15] Smith JF, Eisenberg ML, Millstein SG, Nachtigall RD, Shindel AW, Wing H, et al. The use of complementary and alternative fertility treatment in couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective cohort in the United States. Fertility and Sterility. 2010; 93: 2169–2174.

[16] Wu AK, Elliott P, Katz PP, Smith JF. Time costs of fertility care: the hidden hardship of building a family. Fertility and Sterility. 2013; 99: 2025–2030.

[17] Lawson AK, McQueen DB, Swanson AC, Confino R, Feinberg EC, Pavone ME. Psychological distress and postponed fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2021; 38: 333–341.

[18] Luk BH, Loke AY. The Impact of Infertility on the Psychological well-being, Marital relationships, sexual relationships, and quality of life of couples: a systematic review. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2015; 41: 610–625.

[19] Lundsberg LS, Pal L, Gariepy AM, Xu X, Chu MC, Illuzzi JL. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding conception and fertility: a population-based survey among reproductive-age United States women. Fertility and Sterility. 2014; 101: 767–774.e2.

[20] American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Patient management and clinical recommendations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic (as of March 17, 2020). Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2020; 75: 356–357.

[21] Adelman DS, Fant C, Summer G. COVID-19 and telehealth: applying telehealth and telemedicine in a pandemic. The Nurse Practitioner. 2021; 46: 34–43.

[22] World Health Organization. Global diffusion of mHealth: making universal health coverage achievable. 3th edn. WHO Document Peoduction Services: Geneva. 2016.

[23] Moss RJ, Süle A, Kohl S. EHealth and mHealth. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2019; 26: 57–58.

[24] DeLuca JM, Enmark R. E-health: the changing model of healthcare. Frontiers of Health Services Management. 2000; 17: 3–15.

[25] Mechael PN. The case for mhealth in developing countries. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. 2009; 4: 103–118.

[26] Grady A, Yoong S, Sutherland R, Lee H, Nathan N, Wolfenden L. Improving the public health impact of eHealth and mHealth interventions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2018; 42: 118–119.

[27] Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2013; 10: e1001363.

[28] Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, Green BB, Ginsburg AS. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17: e52

[29] Payne HE, Lister C, West JH, Bernhardt JM. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015; 3: e20.

[30] Berrouiguet S, Baca-García E, Brandt S, Walter M, Courtet P. Fundamentals for future mobile-health (mHealth): a systematic review of mobile phone and web-based text messaging in mental health. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016; 18: e135.

[31] Donker T, Petrie K, Proudfoot J, Clarke J, Birch MR, Christensen H. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013; 15: e247.

[32] Martin T. Assessing mHealth: Opportunities and barriers to patient engagement. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2012; 23: 935–941.

[33] Andino J, Zhu A, Chopra Z, Daignault-Newton S, Ellimoottil C, Dupree JM. Video visits are practical for the follow-up and management of established male infertility patients. Urology. 2021; 154: 158–163.

[34] Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Steegers EAP. Embryonic health: new insights, mHealth and personalised patient care. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2015; 27: 712–715.

[35] Barker D, Barker M, Fleming T, Lampl M. Developmental biology: support mothers to secure future public health. Nature. 2013; 504: 209–211.

[36] Lazard AJ, Watkins I, Mackert MS, Xie B, Stephens KK, Shalev H. Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2016; 23: e157–e161.

[37] Parry JP, Chen SH, Ku L, Anderson K, Keller SL, Omurtag K, et al. Is telehealth a valuable resource in reproductive endocrinology and infertility? Fertility and Sterility. 2022; 117: 690–695.

[38] Duggan M. Mobile technology fact sheet. Pew Research Institute. 2014.

[39] Montgomery R. Smartphone Video Storytelling. 1st edn. Routledge: New York. 2018.

[40] Boedt T, Dancet E, Lie Fong S, Peeraer K, De Neubourg D, Pelckmans S, et al. Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT). BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e029665.

[41] Overdijkink SB, Velu AV, Rosman AN, van Beukering MD, Kok M, Steegers-Theunissen RP. The usability and effectiveness of mobile health technology-based lifestyle and medical intervention apps supporting health care during pregnancy: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018; 6: e109.

[42] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.

[43] Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971; 12: 371–379.

[44] ZUNG WW. A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1965; 12: 63–70.

[45] Timmers T, Keijsers M, Kremer JAM, Janssen L, Smeenk J. Supporting women undergoing IVF treatment with timely patient information through an app: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2021; 9: e28104.

[46] Mousavi SA, Masoumi SZ, Keramat A, Pooralajal J, Shobeiri F. Assessment of questionnaires measuring quality of life in infertile couples: a systematic review. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2013; 14: 110–119.

[47] Peltonen LM, Junttila K, Salanterä S. Front-line physicians’ satisfaction with information systems in hospitals. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2018; 247: 865–869.

[48] Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2002; 21: 1539–1558.

[49] Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019; 10: ED000142.

[50] Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D, Vandenbroucke JP, Irwig L, Macaskill P, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical. BMJ Clinical Research. 1998; 316: 469.

[51] Oostingh EC, Koster MPH, van Dijk MR, Willemsen SP, Broekmans FJM, Hoek A, et al. First effective mHealth nutrition and lifestyle coaching program for subfertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: a single-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility. 2020; 114: 945–954.

[52] Mao J. The effect of eHealth-based information support on family function, anxiety and depression of infertility patients. China Health Care Nutrition. 2020; 30: 70–71.

[53] Pan RH, Yuan XM, Gu WJ, Liu RH, Cao HX, Huang LT, et al. Evaluation of the effect of nursing mode based on mobile platform on assisted reproductive technology for infertility patients. Nursing Practice and Research. 2021; 18: 2789–2792.

[54] Pang XY, Ma ZT, Zhang W, Tang D, Zhang Y. The effect of information support intervention on infertility patients treated with assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Guang Dong Medical College. 2020; 38: 721–724. (In Chinese)

[55] Wang LS. Application of telemedicine on assisted reproductive technology for infertility patients. Journal of Modern Medicine & Health. 2021; 37: 624–626.

[56] Xia XF, Ma ZF, Hu YM, Zhao CC, Tan X, Li ZJ, et al. The role of health guidance based on WeChat platform in the treatment of infertility by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm microinjection. Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology. 2020; 12: 52–56.

[57] Yao N. The impact of continues nursing based on WeChat platform on the psychological status and quality of life of infertility patients [Doctoral dissertation]. Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine. 2019.

[58] Watson R. Netherlands tops European healthcare index. BMJ. 2016; 352: i538.

[59] Peeters JM, Krijgsman JW, Brabers AE, Jong JD, Friele RD. Use and uptake of ehealth in general practice: a cross-sectional survey and focus group study among health care users and general practitioners. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2016; 4: e11.

[60] Yip W, Fu H, Chen AT, Zhai T, Jian W, Xu R, et al. 10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in universal health coverage. the Lancet. 2019; 394: 1192–1204.

[61] Zheng X, Rodríguez-Monroy C. The development of intelligent health-care in China. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2015; 21: 443–448.

[62] Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995; 273: 408–412.

[63] Tierney JF, Stewart LA. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2005; 34: 79–87.

[64] Baker P. Who self‐cares wins: an updated perspective on men and self-care. Trends in Urology & Men’s Health. 2019; 10: 19–22.

[65] Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, Lamb DJ, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II. Fertility and Sterility. 2021; 115: 62–69.

[66] Culley L, Hudson N, Lohan M. Where are all the men? The marginalization of men in social scientific research on infertility. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2013; 27: 225–235.

[67] Mahalik JR, Backus Dagirmanjian FR. Working men’s constructions of visiting the doctor. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 12: 1582–1592.

[68] Hanna E, Gough B. The social construction of male infertility: a qualitative questionnaire study of men with a male factor infertility diagnosis. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2020; 42: 465–480.

[69] Grace B, Shawe J, Johnson S, Stephenson J. You did not turn up… I did not realise I was invited…: understanding male attitudes towards engagement in fertility and reproductive health discussions. Human Reproduction Open. 2019; 2019: hoz014.

[70] Vaughan DA, Shah JS, Penzias AS, Domar AD, Toth TL. Infertility remains a top stressor despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2020; 41: 425–427.

[71] Gameiro S, Canavarro MC, Boivin J. Patient centred care in infertility health care: direct and indirect associations with wellbeing during treatment. Patient Education and Counseling. 2013; 93: 646–654.

[72] Logan S, Anazodo A. The psychological importance of fertility preservation counseling and support for cancer patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98: 583–597.

[73] Patel P, Kohn TP, Cohen J, Shiff B, Kohn J, Ramasamy R. Evaluation of reported fertility preservation counseling before chemotherapy using the quality oncology practice initiative survey. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3: e2010806.

[74] Oostingh EC, Ophuis RH, Koster MP, Polinder S, Lingsma HF, Laven JS, et al. Mobile health coaching on nutrition and lifestyle behaviors for subfertile couples using the smarter pregnancy program: model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019; 7: e13935.

[75] Reeder B, Meyer E, Lazar A, Chaudhuri S, Thompson HJ, Demiris G. Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2013; 82: 565–579.

[76] Linardon J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2020; 88: 1–13.

[77] Farag S, Chyjek K, Chen KT. Identification of iPhone and iPad applications for obstetrics and gynecology providers. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014; 124: 941–945.

[78] Shaia KL, Farag S, Chyjek K, Knopman J, Chen KT. An evaluation of mobile applications for reproductive endocrinology and infertility providers. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2017; 23: 254–258.

[79] Huygens MWJ, Vermeulen J, Swinkels ICS, Friele RD, van Schayck OCP, de Witte LP. Expectations and needs of patients with a chronic disease toward self-management and eHealth for self-management purposes. BMC Health Services Research. 2016; 16: 232.

[80] Swinkels ICS, Huygens MWJ, Schoenmakers TM, Oude Nijeweme-D’Hollosy W, van Velsen L, Vermeulen J, et al. Lessons learned from a living lab on the broad adoption of eHealth in primary health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018; 20: e83.

[81] Oostingh EC, Hall J, Koster MPH, Grace B, Jauniaux E, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. The impact of maternal lifestyle factors on pericon-ception outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38: 77–94.

[82] Kruglova K, O’Connell SBL, Dawadi S, Gelgoot EN, Miner SA, Robins S, et al. An mHealth app to support fertility patients navigating the world of infertility (infotility): development and usability study. JMIR Formative Research. 2021; 5: e28136.