Article Data

  • Views 527
  • Dowloads 137

Original Research

Open Access

GENDER AND AGE DIFFERENCES IN HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND SPENDING AMONG THE OLDER ADULT OUTPATIENT WITH MULTIMORBIDITY

  • Ming-Jye Wang1,2
  • Li-Chen Hung2,3
  • Yi-Ting Lo4

1Department of Secretariat, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan

2Department of Healthcare Management, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan

3Department of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

4Department of Development and Planning, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan

DOI: 10.22374/jomh.v15i4.158 Vol.15,Issue 4,November 2019 pp.1-11

Published: 01 November 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Ming-Jye Wang E-mail: jye9129@gmail.com

PDF (522.1 kB)

Abstract

Background and objective

An aging population and multimorbidity are our inevitable future. Multimorbidity is associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs. Little is known about sex- and age-specific healthcare uti-lization and spending change. A prospective cohort study and a better understanding of sex- and age- related issues and trends are needed so that necessary programs, resources allocation, and cost containment can be executed.

Material and methods

This study used data drawn from the National Health Insurance database of Taiwan and a person-based longitudinal analysis to investigate outpatients aged 55 years and older over a 10-year period.

Results

Among those with multimorbidity, the proportion of multimorbidity was higher for women than for men, especially in the 55–69 age group. There were sex and age differences in healthcare utilization/spending: overall, women had more ambulatory visits than men, but men had a higher total claims amount than women. With regard to age-specific ambulatory visits, more women were in the 55–64 age group, and their total claims amount was not higher than that of men. Men had more ambula-tory visits in the 65–79 age group, and their total claims amount was higher than that of women.

Conclusions

Healthcare utilization was greater among women than men, but men had higher healthcare spending than women. There were evidently differences among age groups. Strategies regarding public health policies and appropriate interventions are urgently needed, particularly for men. It is necessary to increase men’s health awareness and encourage health promotion incentives to reduce the consump-tion of medical resources.

Keywords

healthcare spending; healthcare utilization; multimorbidity

Cite and Share

Ming-Jye Wang,Li-Chen Hung,Yi-Ting Lo. GENDER AND AGE DIFFERENCES IN HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND SPENDING AMONG THE OLDER ADULT OUTPATIENT WITH MULTIMORBIDITY. Journal of Men's Health. 2019. 15(4);1-11.

References

1. Ageing and health. World Health Organization; 2015 [cited 2017 Sep 7]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en/

2. Population Projections for Taiwan: 2016–2060. National Development Council; 2016 [cited 2017 Sep 7]. Available from: http://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=2E5DCB04C64512CC

3. Monthly Bulletin of Interior Statistics. Ministry of the Interior. [cited 2017 Sep 7] Available from: http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/elist.htm

4. World Population Ageing: 1950–2050. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. [cited 2017 Sep 7]. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldageing19502050/

5. Salisbury CJ, Mercer SW, Fortin M. The ABC of multimorbidity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014.

6. Van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JF, Roos S, Knottnerus JA. Multimorbidity in gen-eral practice: Prevalence, incidence, and determi-nants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:367–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00306-5

7. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:223–8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.272

8. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: A retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e12–21. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X548929

9. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature. Age Res Rev 2011;10:430–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003

 10. Schellevis FG. Epidemiology of multiple chronic conditions: An international perspective. J Comorb 2013;3:36–40. https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2013.3.25

 11 . Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, et al. Review: Health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2011;68(4):387–420. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1077558711399580

 12. Yoon J, Zulman D, Scott JY, Maciejewski ML. Costs associated with multimorbidity among VA patients. Med Care 2014;52 Suppl 3:S31–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000061

 13. Ose D, Miksch A, Urban E, et al. Health related quality of life and comorbidity. A descriptive anal-ysis comparing EQ-5D dimensions of patients in the German Disease Management Program for type 2 diabetes and patients in routine care. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:179. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1472-6963-11-179

 14. Lee TA, Shields AE, Vogeli C, et al. Mortality rate in veterans with multiple chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22 Suppl 3:403–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0277-2

 15. Dy SM, Pfoh ER, Salive ME, Boyd CM. Health-related quality of life and functional status quality indicators for older persons with multiple chronic conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:2120–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12555

 16. Marengoni A, von Strauss E, Rizzuto D, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. The impact of chronic multimor-bidity and disability on functional decline and survival in elderly persons. A community-based, longitudinal study. J Intern Med 2009;265:288–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02017.x

 17. Alimohammadian M., Majidi A, Yaseri M, et al. Multimorbidity as an important issue among women: Results of a gender difference investiga-tion in a large population-based cross-sectional study in West Asia. BMJ Open 2017;7(5):e013548. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013548

 18. Sambamoorthi U, Tan X, Deb A. Multiple chronic conditions and healthcare costs among adults. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(5):823–32. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737 167.2015.1091730

 19. Blumenthal D, Chernof B, Fulmer T, Lumpkin J, Selberg J. Caring for high-need, high-cost patients-an urgent priority. N Engl J Med 2016;375:909–11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1608511

 20. Fortin M, Dionne J, Pinho G, Gignac J, Almirall J, Lapointe L. Randomized controlled trials: Do they have external validity for patients with multi-ple comorbidities? Ann Fam Med 2006;4:104–8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.516

 21. Ageing and life-course-Specifically the Strategy focuses on five strategic objectives. World Health Organization. [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://who.int/ageing/global-strategy/en/

 22. National Health Insurance Research Database. National Health Research Institutes. [cited 2014 Mar 12]. Available from: http://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/index.html

 23. Fu S, Huang N, Chou Y. Trends in the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions in Taiwan from 2000 to 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:E187. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140205

 24. Van Oostrom SH, Gijsen R, Stirbu I, et al. Time trends in prevalence of chronic diseases and mul-timorbidity not only due to aging: Data from General practices and health surveys. PLoS One 2016;11(8):e0160264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0160264

 25. Fortin M, Hudon C, Haggerty J, Akker M, Almirall J. Prevalence estimates of multimorbid-ity: A comparative study of two sources. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:111. https://doi. org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-111

 26. Agur K, McLean G, Hunt K, Guthrie B, Mercer SW. How does sex influence multimorbidity?Secondary analysis of a large nationally repre-sentative dataset. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13(4):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph 13040391

 27. Murtagh KN, Hubert HB. Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1406–11. https://doi. org/10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1406

 28. Autenrieth CS, Kirchberger I, Heier M, et al. Physical activity is inversely associated with multi-morbidity in elderly men: Results from the KORA-Age Augsburg study. Prev Med 2013;57:17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.014

 29. Khanam MA, Streatfield PK, Kabir ZN, Qiu C, Cornelius C, Wahlin A. Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity among elderly people in rural Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. J Health Popul Nutr 2011;29(4):406–14 https://doi.org/ 10.3329/jhpn.v29i4.8458

 30. Harvard Medical School. Mars vs. Venus: The Gender Gap in Health. Harv Mens Health Watch 2010;14(6):1–5.

 31. Calasanti T. Gender relations and applied research on aging. Gerontologist 2010;50(6):720–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq085

 32. O’Brien R, Hunt K, Hart G. It’s caveman stuff, but that is to a certain extent how guys still oper-ate: Men’s accounts of masculinity and help seeking. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:503–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.008

 33. Is it basic biology? [cited 2017 Oct 13]. Available from: http://theconversation.com/if-men-are-favored- in-our-society-why-do-they-die-younger-than-women-71527

 34. Vaidya V, Partha G, Karmakar M. Gender differ-ences in utilization of preventive care services in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2012;21(2):140–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh. 2011.2876

 35. Galdas PM, Cheater F, Marshall P. Men and health help-seeking behaviour: Literature review. J Adv Nurs 2005;49:616–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/

j. 1365-2648.2004.03331.x

 36. Juel K, Christensen K. Are men seeking medical advice too late? Contacts to general practitioners and hospital admissions in Denmark 2005.J Public Health 2008;30(1):111–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdm072

 37. Schoenborn CA, Heyman KM. Health character-istics of adults aged 55 years and over: United States, 2004–2007. Natl Health Stat Report 2009;8(16):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/e623972

009- 001

 38. Stenholm S, Westerlund H, Salo P, et al. Age-related trajectories of physical functioning in work and retirement: The role of sociodemo-graphic factors, lifestyle and disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014;68(6):503–9. https://doi. org/10.1136/jech-2013-203555

 39. Fortin M, Stewart M, Poitras ME, Almirall J, Maddocks H. A systematic review of preva-lence studies on multimorbidity: Toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med 2012;10(2): 142–51. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm. 1337

 40. Vegda K, Nie JX, Wang L, Tracy CS, Moineddin R, Upshur RE. Trends in health services utiliza-tion, medication use, and health conditions among older adults: A 2-year retrospective chart review in a primary care practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:217. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1472-6963-9-217

 41. Ek S. Gender differences in health information behaviour: A Finnish population-based survey. Health Promot Int 2015;30:736–45. https://doi. org/10.1093/heapro/dat063

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top