Article Data

  • Views 573
  • Dowloads 152

Original Research

Open Access

ACCELEROMETER-BASED INSTANTANEOUS FEEDBACK TECHNOLOGY IS AS EFFECTIVE AS COACH’S SUPERVISION ON THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF RESISTANCE TRAINING SESSIONS FOR UNIVERSITY 

WRESTLING ATHLETES

  • Duck Pil OK 1
  • Ju Yong Bae1

1Laboratory of Exercise Biochemistry, Department of Physical Education, College of Arts and Physical Education, Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22374/jomh.v15i3.162 Vol.15,Issue 3,July 2019 pp.89-98

Published: 02 July 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Ju Yong Bae E-mail: kosa99@dau.ac.kr

PDF (455.34 kB)

Abstract

Background and Objective

We investigated how VBT devices’ instantaneous feedback affects resistance training efficiency under different intensities.

Material and Methods

Eight university wrestling athletes were recruited (21±0.42 years) and three separated experiments were conducted under no-supervision (NSUP), coach supervision (CSUP), and instantaneous velocity feedback (VBT) conditions on 10 days apart. Maximal repetition to failure back squat on 65%1RM and 85%1RM was performed on 1080 quantum smith machine.

Results

Repetition and volume were significantly greater in CSUP (Rep: p=0.034, Vol: p=0.020) and VBT (Rep: p=0.003, Vol: p=0.001) than NSUP group at 65%1RM, but VBT group only showed statistically greater outcomes at 85%1RM than NSUP (Rep: p=0.015, Vol: p=0.020). However, total work was only significantly greater in VBT group regardless of intensity, and it showed identically greater at 65%1RM than both NSUP (p=0.001) and CSUP groups (p=0.036). While peak force remained as no difference between any groups and trials, peak velocity and power was significantly greater in VBT group than NSUP (pVel 65%1RM: p=0.018 and 85%1RM: p=0.007, pPow 65%1RM: p=0.004 and 85%1RM: p=0.006) and CSUP groups (pVel 65%1RM: p=0.008 and 85%1RM: p=0.023, pPow 65%1RM: p=0.001 and 85%1RM: p=0.015) regardless of intensity.

Conclusion

The present study, therefore, concluded that the instantaneous feedback from VBT device encouraged wrestling athletes to perform longer and harder than coach’s encouragement in the resistance training. This may suggest that velocity-based training effectively assisted resistance training session even if the strength coach or team coach is not available.

Keywords

auditory feedback; training efficiency; VBT; velocity-based training; visual feedback

Cite and Share

Duck Pil OK ,Ju Yong Bae. ACCELEROMETER-BASED INSTANTANEOUS FEEDBACK TECHNOLOGY IS AS EFFECTIVE AS COACH’S SUPERVISION ON THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF RESISTANCE TRAINING SESSIONS FOR UNIVERSITY WRESTLING ATHLETES. Journal of Men's Health. 2019. 15(3);89-98.

References

1. Staub JN, Kraemer WJ, Pandit AL, et al. Positive effects of augmented verbal feedback on power production in NCAA Division I collegiate ath-letes. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27:2067–72. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827a9c2a

2. Neumann DL, Piercy A. The effect of different attentional strategies on physiological and psy-chological states during running. Aust Psychol 2013;48:329–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12015

3. Suchomel TJ, Sole CJ. Power-time curve compar-ison between weightlifting derivatives [internet]. J Sports Sci Med 2017;16:407–13. [cited 2019 July 16]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/28912659.

4. Quatman CE, Myer GD, Khoury J, Wall EJ, Hewett TE. Sex differences in “weightlifting” injuries presenting to United States emergency rooms. J Strength Cond Res 2009;23:2061–7. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b86cb9.

5. Jovanović M, Flanagan EP. Researched applica-tions of velocity based strength training. J Aust Strength Cond 2014;22:58–69.

6. McGladrey BW, Hannon JC, Faigenbaum AD, Shultz BB, Shaw JM. High school physical educa-tors’ and sport coaches’ knowledge of resistance training principles and methods. J Strength Cond Res 2014;28:1433–42. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC. 0000000000000265

7. Coutts AJ, Murphy AJ, Dascombe BJ. The effect of direct supervision on a strength coach on measures of muscular strength and power in young rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 2003;18:316–23. https://doi.org/10.1519/

R- 12972.1

8. Behm DG, Young JD, Whitten JHD, et al. Effectiveness of traditional strength vs. power training on muscle strength, power and speed with youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2017;30:1–37. https://doi. org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00423

9. DeLorme TL. Restoration of muscle power by heavy-resistance exercises. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1945;27:645–67. [cited 2019 July 16]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/ 1945/27040/RESTORATION_OF_MUSCLE_ POWER_BY_HEAVY_RESISTANCE.14.aspx.

 10. García-Pallarés J, López-Gullón JM, Muriel X, Díaz A, Izquierdo M. Physical fitness factors to predict male Olympic wrestling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011;111:1747–58. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00421-010-1809-8

 11. Horswill CA. Applied physiology of amateur wrestling. Sports Med 1992;14:114–43. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199214020-00004

 12. Hübner-Woźniak E, Kosmol A, Lutoslawska G, Bem EZ. Anaerobic performance of arms and legs in male and female free style wrestlers. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7:473–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80266-4

 13. Stone MH, Stone M, Sands WA. Principles and practice of resistance training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007.

 14. Hawley JA, Lundby C, Cotter JD, Burke LM. Maximizing cellular adaptation to endurance exer-cise in skeletal muscle. Cell Metab 2018;27:962–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.014

 15. Ozaki H, Kubota A, Natsume T, et al. Effects of drop sets with resistance training on increases in muscle CSA, strength, and endurance: A pilot study. J Sports Sci 2018;36:691–6. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02640414.2017.1331042

 16. Behm DG, Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1993;74: 359–68. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.74.1.359

 17. Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1 – Biological basis of maximal power produc-tion. Sports Med 2011;41:17–38. https://doi. org/10.2165/11537690-000000000-00000

 18. Peltonen H, Walker S, Hackney AC, Avela J, Häkkinen K. Increased rate of force development during periodized maximum strength and power training is highly individual. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018;118:1033–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3836-9

 19. Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Davies TB, Lazinica B, Krieger JW, Pedisic Z. Effect of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analy-sis. Sports Med 2018;48:1207–20. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x

 20. Ratamess NA, Faigenbaum AD, Hoffman JR, Kang J. Self-selected resistance training intensity in healthy women: The influence of a personal trainer. J Strength Cond Res 2008;22:103–11. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f29cc

 21. Morán-Navarro R, Martínez-Cava A, Sánchez-Medina L, Mora-Rodríguez R, González-Badillo JJ, Pallarés JG. Movement velocity as a measure of level of effort during resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2019;33:1496–1504. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002017

 22. González-Badillo JJ, Sánchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resis-tance training. Int J Sports Med 2010;31:347–352. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1248333

 23. Harris RC, Edwards RH, Hultman E, Nordesjö LO, Nylind B, Sahlin K. The time course of phosphoryl-creatine resynthesis during recovery of the quadri-ceps muscle in man. Pflugers Arch 1976;367:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00585149

 24. Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Haff GG. Reliability and validity of the load-velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. J Strength Cond Res 2017;31:1897–904. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC. 0000000000001657

 25. Sedliak M, Finni T, Cheng S, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Effect of time-of-day-specific strength training on serum hormone concentra-tions and isometric strength in men. Chronobiol Int 2007;24:1159–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 074 20520701800686

 26. Balsalobre-Fernández C, Kuzdub M, Poveda-Ortiz P, Campo-Vecino JD. Validity and reliabil-ity of the PUSH wearable device to measure movement velocity during the back squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2016;30:1968–74. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001284

 27. Mazzetti SA, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, et al. The influence of direct supervision of resistance training on strength performance [Internet]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:1175–84. [cited 2019 July 16]. Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=10862549

 28. Weakley JJ, Wilson KM, Till K, et al. Visual feedback attenuates mean concentric barbell velocity loss, and improves motivation, competi-tiveness, and perceived workload in male adoles-cent athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2017 Jul 12. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002133.[Epub ahead of print]

 29. Argus CK, Gill ND, Keogh JW, Hopkins WG. Acute effects of verbal feedback on upper-body performance in elite athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2011;25:3282–7. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182133b8c

 30. Randell AD, Cronin JB, Keogh JW, Gill ND, Pedersen MC. Effect of instantaneous perfor-mance feedback during 6 weeks of velocity-based resistance training on sport-specific performance tests. J Strength Cond Res 2011;25:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fee634

 31. Ayers SF, Housner LD. A descriptive analysis of undergraduate PETE programs [Internet]. J Teach Phys Educ 2008;27:51–67. [cited 2019 July 16]. Available from: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/humanperformance_ faculty/14

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top