Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY ON AWARENESS OF REPRODUCTIVE PROTECTION AND AUTOLOGOUS SPERM PRESERVATION AMONG CANCER PATIENTS
1International Hospital Preparatory Office, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
2Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Shandong, China
3Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
4Department of Andrology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
*Corresponding Author(s): Wang Peitao E-mail: peitaowang@yeah.net
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the awareness of fertility protection among male patients and their healthcare providers in the treatment process of cancer.
Methods
In a cross-sectional study, we applied a questionnaire survey among patients and healthcare providers who were selected randomly: the physician group consisted of oncologists and hematologists, and the patient group included participants with cancer from 15 to 45 years old, who were recruited from hos-pitals in Qingdao. Meanwhile, data from male cancer patients, who received sperm cryopreservation in our hospital, were also analyzed.
Results
Data collected from healthcare provider group showed that more than 80% of clinicians warned patients of the fertility impairment along with chemotherapy or other treatments, whereas a few clini-cians recommended specific methods for reproductive protection to patients with special attention be paid to the follow-up fertility result. In patient group, more than 50% indicated they would accept the loss of fertility caused by cancer therapies. The rate of awareness of sperm cryopreservation, as an effective way of reproductive protection, was low among both physician and patient groups. In the past 3 years, only 63 samples of semen from 54 cancer patients were cryopreserved in our hospital.
Conclusion
The awareness of reproductive protection in both physicians and cancer patients was not satisfied in Qingdao, China, and this finding indicates a need for comprehensive health education and practical protocols for both patients and healthcare providers in terms of reproductive protection for male patients with cancers.
cancer; fertility impairment; reproductive protection; sperm cryopreservation
Wang Xi,Dong Gan,Shao Cuihua,Wang Peitao. A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY ON AWARENESS OF REPRODUCTIVE PROTECTION AND AUTOLOGOUS SPERM PRESERVATION AMONG CANCER PATIENTS. Journal of Men's Health. 2020. 16(3);19-28.
1. Tournaye H, Dohle GR, Barratt CLR. Fertility preservation in men with cancer. Lancet 2014;84:1295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (14)60495-5
2. Karunakaran P, Malhotra P, Lad D. Fertility management for the hemato-oncologist. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2018; 34(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s122 88-01
7- 08 87-8
3. Bunge RG, Sherman JK. Fertilizing capacity of frozen human spermatozoa. Nature 1953; 172(4382): 767–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ 17276 7b0
4. Kawai K, Nishiyama H. Preservation of fertility of adult male cancer patients treated with chemo-therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1333-0
5. Yogev L, Kleiman SE, Shabtai E, et al. Long-term cryostorage of spermin a human sperm bank does not damage progressive motility concentration. Hum Reprod 2010;25(5):1097–103. https://doi. org/10.1093/humrep/deq041
6. Okada K, Fujisawa M. Recovery of spermatogen-esis following cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. World J Mens Health. 2019;37(2):166–174 https://doi.org/ 10.5534/wjmh.180043
7. Mancini J, Rey D, Préau M, et al. Infertility induced by cancer treatment: Inappropriate or no information provided to majority of French survivors of cancer. Fertil Steril 2008;90(5):1616–
25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08. 064
8. Moody JA, Ahmed K, Yap T, Minhas S, Shabbir
M. Fertility management in testicular cancer: The need to establish a standardized and evidence-based patient-centric pathway. BJU Int 2019;123:160–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14455
9. Stern C, Agresta F. Setting up a fertility preserva-tion programme. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;55:67–78. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2018.07.007
10. Horne G, Atkinson AD, Pease EH, et al. Live birth with spermcryopreserved for 21 years prior to cancer treatment: Case report. Hum Reprod 2004;19(6):1448–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hum-rep/deh249
11. Feldschuh J, Brassel J, Durso N, et al. Successful sperm storage for 28 years. Fertil Steril 2005;84(4):1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertn-stert. 2005.05.015
12. Liu F, Zou SS, Zhu Y, et al. A novel micro-straw for cryopreservationof small number of human spermatozoon. Asian J Androl 2016. https://doi. org/10.4103/1008-682X.173452
13. Rabah DM, Wahdan IH, Merdawy A, et al. Oncologists’ knowledge andpractice towards sperm cryopreservation in Arabic communities. J Cancer Survive 2010;4(3):279–83. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11764-010-0140-z
14. Shnorhavorian M, Harlan LC, Smith AW, et al. Fertility preservationknowledge, counseling, and actions among adolescent and young adultpa-tients with cancer: A population-based study. Cancer 2015;121(19):3499–506. https://doi. org/10.1002/cncr.29328
15. Daudin M, Rives N, Walschaerts M, et al. Sperm cryopreservation inadolescents and young adults with cancer: Results of the French national sperm banking network (CECOS). Fertil Steril 2015,103(2):478–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2014.11.012
16. Besharati M, Woodruff T, Victorson D. Young adults’ access to fertility preservation services at National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program minority/underserved commu-nity sites: Aqualitative study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2016;5(2):187–200. https://doi. org/10.1089/jayao.2015.0034
17. Sheng HQ, Zhang XZ, Hong Y. Analysis of the quality of cryopreserved semen from male cancer patients. Natl J Androl 2015;21(1):44–7.
18. Chung JP, Haines CJ, Kong GW. Sperm cryopreser-vation for Chinese male cancer patients: A 17-year retrospective analysis in an assisted reproductive unit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2013;19(6): 525–30. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj134055
19. Ping P, Gu BH, Li P, et al. Fertility outcome of patients with testiculartumor: Before and after treatment. Asian J Androl 2014;16(1):107–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122194
20. Traila A, Dima D, Achimas-Cadariu P, Micu R. Fertility preservation in Hodgkin’s lymphomapa-tients that undergo targeted moleculartherapies: An important step forward fromthe chemotherapy era. Cancer Manage Res 2018;10:1517–26. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S154819
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top