EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM CARDIAC REHABILITATION PROGRAMS ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS AND PHYSICAL FITNESS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
1Department of Sports Science Convergence, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Physical Education, Institution of Sports Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
DOI: 10.15586/jomh.v16i3.253 Vol.16,Issue 3,July 2020 pp.29-37
Published: 16 July 2020
Cardiac rehabilitation programs reduce the likelihood of relapse and cardiac arrest in patients with cor-onary artery disease. The goal of this study was to compare and analyze changes in cardiovascular risk factors and physical fitness in patients who participated in short-term (ST) and long-term (LT) cardiac rehabilitation programs following coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
This study included 193 men aged ≥45 years who received PCI for coronary artery occlusive disease. The participants were divided into ST program participants (3 months, 108 participants; ST group) and LT program participants (12 months, 85 participants; LT group). Blood lipids analysis, body composition, and physical fitness tests were performed to assess cardiovascular risk factors and physical fitness. Paired t-test and two-way ANOVA with repeated measures were used to investigate the effect of the intervention.
Both groups had significant improvements after cardiac rehabilitation in body fat, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, exercise duration, heart rate (HR) at rest, double product peak, VO2 peak, 6-min walking, and sit-to-stand, compared to baseline. The LT group also had significant improvements after cardiac rehabili-tation in waist circumference (WC), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and HR peak. LT group had significantly improved effect than ST group in WC, TC, TG, exercise time, HR peak, and 6-min walking.
The cardiac rehabilitation program led to improved cardiovascular risk factors and physical fitness, and the LT program was more effective than the ST program.
cardiac rehabilitation; risk factor; fitness; percutaneous coronary intervention
Duk Han Ko,Kyujin Lee,Jinwook Chung. EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM CARDIAC REHABILITATION PROGRAMS ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS AND PHYSICAL FITNESS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION. Journal of Men's Health. 2020. 16(3);29-37.
1. Abubakar I, Tillmann T, Banerjee A. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385:117–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2
2. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:1135–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/hc0902.104353
3. Capodanno D, Stone GW, Morice MC, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coro-nary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coro-nary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1426–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.005
4. Piepoli MF, Corra U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab. 2010;17:1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592
5. Young Taeck Oh, Jaehoon Oh, Seung Min Park, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Signa Vitae. 2019. 15;40-44. https://
6. DeBusk RF, Haskell WL, Miller NH, et al. Medically directed at-home rehabilitation soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: A new model for patient care. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:251–
7. Kachur S, Chongthammakun V, Lavie CJ, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs in coronary heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60:103–14. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.pcad.2017.07.002
8. Palasuwan A, Margaritis I, Soogarun S, et al. Dietary intakes and antioxidant status in mind-body exercising pre - and postmenopausal women. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011;15:577-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
9. Worcester MU, Murphy BM, Mee VK, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation programmes: Predictors of non- attendance and drop-out. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab. 2004;11:328–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. hjr.0000137083.20844.54
10. ACSM (American College Sports Medicine). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and pre-scription. 10th ed. Philadephia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
11. Gordon NF, Gulanick M, Costa F, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: An American Heart Association sci-entific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation. 2004;109:2031–41. http://dx. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000126280.65777.A4
12. Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, et al. The
6- min walk test: A quick measure of functional sta-tus in elderly adults. Chest. 2003;123:387–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.2.387
13. Maurissen JP, Marable BR, Andrus AK, et al. Factors affecting grip strength testing. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2003;25:543–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-0362(03)00073-4
14. Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Senior fitness test manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013.
15. Goel K, Lennon RJ, Tilbury RT, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and cardiovascu-lar events after percutaneous coronary intervention in the community. Circulation. 2011;123:2344–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 110.983536
16. Yohannes AM, Doherty P, Bundy C, et al. The long-term benefits of cardiac rehabilitation on depression, anxiety, physical activity and quality of life. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:2806–13. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03313.x
17. Oldridge N. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: Meta-analysis outcomes revisited. Future Cardiol. 2012;8:729–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fca.12.34
18. Gordon B, Chen S, Durstine JL. The effects of exercise training on the traditional lipid profile and beyond. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014;13:253–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000073
19. Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training in secondary coronary heart dis-ease prevention. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;53:397–
20. Scranton R, Sesso HD, Stampfer MJ, et al. Predictors of 14-year changes in the total choles-terol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in men. Am Heart J. 2004;147:1033–8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.018
21. Brubaker PH, Warner JG Jr, Rejeski WJ, et al. Comparison of standard-and extended-length par-ticipation in cardiac rehabilitation on body compo-sition, functional capacity, and blood lipids. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:769–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00418-3
22. Morrin L, Black S, Reid R. Impact of duration in a cardiac rehabilitation program on coronary risk profile and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2000;20:115–21. http://
23. McGrady A, McGinnis R, Badenhop D, et al. Effects of depression and anxiety on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009;29:358–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181be7a8f
24. Al-Daghri NM, Alkharfy KM, Al-Attas OS, et al. Gender-dependent associations between socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study in the adult Saudi population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:51. http://doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2261-14-51
25. Schutte R, Thijs L, Asayama K, et al. Double prod-uct reflects the predictive power of systolic pressure in the general population: Evidence from 9,937 par-ticipants. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26:665–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hps119
26. Jolly MA, Brennan DM, Cho L. Impact of exercise on heart rate recovery. Circulation. 2011;124:1520–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.005009
27. Pérez IP, Zapata MÁ, Cervantes CE, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation programs improve metabolic parame-ters in patients with the metabolic syndrome and coro-nary heart disease. J Clin Hypertens. 2010;12:374–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00259.x
28. Kemi OJ, Haram PM, Loennechen JP, et al. Moderate vs. high exercise intensity: Differential effects on aerobic fitness, cardiomyocyte contractility, and endothelial function. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;67:161–
29. Wessel TR, Arant CB, Olson MB, et al. Relationship of physical fitness vs body mass index with coro-nary artery disease and cardiovascular events in women. JAMA. 2004;292:1179–87. http://dx.doi. org/10.1001/jama.292.10.1179
30. Shin Y-O, Bae J-S, Lee J-B, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation and statin treatment on anti-HSP antibody titers in patients with coronary artery dis-ease after percutaneous coronary intervention. Int Heart J. 2006;47:671–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1536/ihj.47.671
31. Boulay P, Prud’Homme D. Risk factor management after short-term versus long-term cardiac rehabili-tation program. Coronary Health Care. 2001;5:133–
32. Kim YH, So W-Y. A low arm and leg mus-cle mass to total body weight ratio is associated with an increased prevalence of metabolic syn-drome: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2011. Technol Health Care. 2016;24:655–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-161162
33. Ho S, Chen Y, Woo J, et al. Association between simple anthropometric indices and cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1689–97. http://dx. doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801784
Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.
Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.