Main Article Content

Zhengjia Ren
Ralph Hood
Chunsong Yang
Xiqi Lu
Qiuyu Su
Li Tsingan


self-construal, homophobia, cross-cultural, homosexuality


Background and Objective
Internalized homophobia is common among gay men. Gay men who live in high-tolerance social environments tend to have less internalized homophobia than gay men who live in low-tolerance environments. The interaction between the living environment and self-construal influences gay men’s internalized homophobia.

Material and Methods
This study examined the association between self-construal and homophobia according to the living environment using a sample of gay men (N=521) aged 14–43 years. The data were collected between January and August 2017 using an online questionnaire that included an internalized homophobia scale, self-construal items, and demographic characteristics. The two-way ANOVA analyses revealed that the self-construal type was differentially associated with internalized homophobia depending on the living environment of the study participants.

Living in a high-tolerance area while having an independent self-construal was associated with lower internalized homophobia scores than living in a low-tolerance area. In contrast, alternating between independent and dependent self-construals was associated with higher internalized homophobia scores.

Mental health services for participants with conflicted self-construals are emerging. Self-acceptance and compassion-focused practices should be explored as a way to help gay men adjust their conflicted self-construals.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 117 | pdf Downloads 53 HTML Downloads 16 xml Downloads 4


1. Kafetsios K, Hess U, Nezlek JB. Self-construal, affective valence of the encounter, and quality of social interactions: within and cross-culture examination. J Soc Psychol 2018;158(1):82–92.
2. Liu FF, Goto SG. Self-construal, mental distress, and family relations: a mediated moderation analysis with Asian American adolescents. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2007;13(2):134–42.
3. Hwang K-K. Foundations of Chinese psychology: confucian social relations. Vol. 1 New York, NY: Springer. 2011.
4. Yang K-S. Theories and research in Chinese personality: An indigenous approach. In H. S. R. Kao & D. Sinha (Eds.), Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Vol. 19. Asian perspectives on psychology. (pp. 236–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. 1996.
5. Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 1991;98(2):224.
6. Lu L, Gilmour R. Culture and conceptions of happiness: individual oriented and social oriented SWB. J Happiness Stud 2004;5(3):269–291.
7. Kim U, Yang K-S, Hwang K-K. Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In U. Kim, K.S. Yang & K.K. Hwang (Eds.) Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 1–25). New York: Springer. 2006.
8. Ren Z, Hood RW, Jr. Internalized homophobia scale for gay Chinese men: conceptualization, factor structure, reliability, and associations with hypothesized correlates. Am J Mens Health 2018;12(5):1297–306.
9. Chan KK. Family and homosexuality in Chinese culture: rights claims by non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong. Sex Cult 2017;21(3):845–859.
10. Ren Z, Howe CQ, Zhang W. Maintaining “mianzi” and “lizi”: understanding the reasons for formality marriages between gay men and lesbians in China. Transcult Psychiatry 2019;56(1):213–32.
11. Green MA, Scott NA, Devilder EL, Zeiger A, Darr S. Relational-interdependent self-construal as a function of bulimic symptomatology. J Clin` Psychol 2006;62(7):943–51.
12. Fung HH, Isaacowitz DM, Lu AY, Li T. Interdependent self-construal moderates the age-related negativity reduction effect in memory and visual attention. Psychol Aging 2010;25(2):321–9.
13. Cross SE, Gore JS, Morris ML. The relational-interdependent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;85(5):933–44.
14. Herek GM, Cogan JC, Gillis JR, Glunt EK. Correlates of internalized homophobia in a community sample of lesbians and gay men. J Gay Lesbian Med Assoc 1998;2:17–26.
15. Frederick DA, Kelly MC, Latner JD, Sandhu G, Tsong Y. Body image and face image in Asian American and white women: examining associations with surveillance, construal of self, perfectionism, and sociocultural pressures. Body Image 2016;16:113–25.
16. Balkir N, Arens EA, Wolff C, Barnow S. [The link between self-construal and mental distress in Turkish migrants and German women with depression]. Psychiatr Prax 2013;40(3):135–41.
17. Ferenczi N, Marshall TC, Bejanyan K. The protective and detrimental effects of self-construal on perceived rejection from heritage culture members. Front Psychol 2015;6:100.
18. Van Beusekom G, Bos HM, Kuyper L, Overbeek G, Sandfort TG. Gender nonconformity and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: homophobic stigmatization and internalized homophobia as mediators. J Health Psychol 2018 Aug;23(9):1211–22.
19. Herrick AL, Stall R, Chmiel JS, et al. It gets better: resolution of internalized homophobia over time and associations with positive health outcomes among MSM. AIDS Behav 2013;17(4):1423–30.
20. Fitzgerald R, Winstone L, Prestage Y. Searching for evidence of acculturation: attitudes toward homosexuality among migrants moving from Eastern to Western Europe. Int J Public Opinion Res 2014;26(3):323–41.
21. Bianchi FT, Reisen CA, Cecilia Zea M, Poppen PJ, Shedlin MG, Penha MM. The sexual experiences of Latino men who have sex with men who migrated to a gay epicentre in the USA. Cult Health Sex 2007;9(5):505–18.
22. George C, Adam BA, Read SE, et al. The MaBwana Black men’s study: community and belonging in the lives of African, Caribbean and other Black gay men in Toronto. Cult Health Sex 2012;14(5):549–62.
23. Murray DA. The challenge of home for sexual orientation and gendered identity refugees in Toronto. J Canadian Stud 2014;48(1):132–52.
24. Barnett MD, Oz HCM, Marsden AD, 3rd. Economic and social political ideology and homophobia: the mediating role of binding and individualizing moral foundations. Arch Sex Behav 2018 May;47(4):1183–94.
25. Buyantueva R. LGBT rights activism and homophobia in Russia. J Homosex 2018, 65(4): 456–483.
26. Hondagneu-Sotelo P. Gendered transitions: Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1994.
27. Huang FY, Akhtar S. Immigrant sex: the transport of affection and sensuality across cultures. Am J Psychoanal 2005;65(2):179–88.
28. Carrillo H. Sexual migration, cross-cultural sexual encounters, and sexual health. Sex Res Soc Policy 2004;1(3):58–70.
29. Parker RG. Migration, sexual subcultures, and HIV/AIDS in Brazil. In: Herdt, G., editor. Sexual culture and Migration in the Era of AIDS. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1997. p. 55–69.
30. Luhtanen RK. Identity, stigma management, and well-being: a comparison of lesbians/bisexual women and gay/bisexual men. J Lesbian Stud 2002;7(1):85–100.
31. Elizur Y, Ziv M. Family support and acceptance, gay male identity formation, and psychological adjustment: a path model. Fam Process 2001;40(2):125–44.
32. Terry ML, Leary MR. Self-compassion, self-regulation, and health. Self Identity 2011;10(3):352–62.