Article Data

  • Views 430
  • Dowloads 123

Original Research

Open Access

Share his troubles: perceptions of men living with grief

  • Theaanna Kiaos1,*,

1The Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, 2052 Sydney, NSW, Australia

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.135 Vol.20,Issue 8,August 2024 pp.97-108

Submitted: 03 May 2024 Accepted: 03 June 2024

Published: 30 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Theaanna Kiaos E-mail: a.kiaos@unsw.edu.au

Abstract

The National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement by the Australian Government seeks to reduce men’s suicide rates. Yet men who experience grief face unique challenges, including stigmatisation when they are perceived as failing to adhere loyally to their socialised gendered role. One challenge pertaining to bereaved men concerns their social network and how insiders and outsiders come to understand the subjective nature of their grief, and how best to offer support. The present study adopted a social constructionist approach to explore how participants perceived a fictitious character experiencing grief using a hypothetical vignette. A convenience sample of nine males and seven females who resided in Australia participated in answering seven questions concerning the character’s experience of grief by way of associated social networks. The following analytic themes were identified: either participants work with or against hegemonic masculinity to: (1) help me feel their grief, (2) help men think through their grief, and (3) help men express their grief. The study highlights the importance of developing tools to assist social networks of bereaved men to help them feel, think and express their emotions during times of grief. Scholars may expand upon the findings by adopting in-depth qualitative and Online Photo Voice methodologies to develop enhanced mental health practitioner tools to assist men who are experiencing grief as well as their social networks.


Keywords

Grief; Men’s mental health; Social constructionism; Hegemonic masculinity; Inner and outer social network


Cite and Share

Theaanna Kiaos. Share his troubles: perceptions of men living with grief. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(8);97-108.

References

[1] Balcı Şengül MC, Kaya V, Şen CA, Kaya K. Association between suicidal ideation and behavior, and depression, anxiety, and perceived social support in cancer patients. Medical Science Monitor. 2014; 20: 329–336.

[2] Park S, Hatim Sulaiman A, Srisurapanont M, Chang SM, Liu CY, Bautista D, et al; Mood Disorders Research: Asian & Australian Network. The association of suicide risk with negative life events and social support according to gender in Asian patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Research. 2025; 228: 277–282.

[3] Sarper E, Rodrigues DL. The role of perceived social support in the grief experiences of more anxious and self-compassionate people. To be published in OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying. 2024. [Preprint].

[4] Shear MK. Grief and mourning gone awry: pathway and course of complicated grief. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2012; 14: 119–128.

[5] Kiaos, T. (2023). Stop being a wuss: People's perceptions of men experiencing grief in Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.794

[6] Dyregrov A, Dyregrov K. Effective grief and bereavement support: the role of family, friends, colleagues, schools and support professionals. 1st edition. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London. 2008.

[7] Gilbert K. We’ve had the same loss, why don’t we have the same grief? Loss and differential grief in families. Death Studies. 1996; 20: 269–283.

[8] Nohesara S, Saeidi M, Mosavari H, Ghalichi L, Alebouyeh MR. Grief experience among ICU staff with loss of family members during COVID-19 outbreak in IRAN: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2022; 13: 904760.

[9] Defoe DI. A self-reflection bereavement guide for widowers experiencing complicated grief [Doctoral thesis]. Regent University. 2023.

[10] Stroebe M, Schut H, Stroebe W. Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet. 2007; 370: 1960–1973.

[11] Lindemann E. Symptomatology and management of acute grief. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994; 101: 141–148.

[12] Champion MJ, Kilcullen M. Complicated grief following the traumatic loss of a child: a systematic review. To be published in OMEGA—Journal of death and dying. 2023. [Preprint].

[13] Drucker A, Levi-Belz Y, Hamdan S. Depression, complicated grief, and suicide ideation following bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic. To be published in OMEGA—Journal of death and dying. 2023. [Preprint].

[14] Hilberdink CE, Ghainder K, Dubanchet A, Hinton D, Djelantik AAAMJ, Hall BJ, et al. Bereavement issues and prolonged grief disorder: a global perspective. Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. 2023; 10: e32.

[15] Ratcliffe M. Grief worlds: a study of emotional experience. 1st edition. MIT Press: Cambridge. 2023.

[16] Zhou N, Zhao Y, Smith KV, Killikelly C, Stelzer E, Maercker A, et al. Existential isolation and prolonged grief in bereaved people: the moderating role of culture. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2023; 30: 862–872.

[17] Li J, Stroebe M, Chan CL, Chow AY. Guilt in bereavement: a review and conceptual framework. Death Studies. 2014; 38: 165–171.

[18] Stroebe M, Stroebe W, van de Schoot R, Schut H, Abakoumkin G, Li J. Guilt in bereavement: the role of self-blame and regret in coping with loss. PLOS ONE. 2014; 2014; 9: e96606.

[19] Lancel M, Stroebe M, Eisma MC. Sleep disturbances in bereavement: a systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2020; 53: 101331.

[20] Sim J, Machin L, Bartlam B. Identifying vulnerability in grief: psychometric properties of the adult attitude to grief scale. Quality of Life Research. 2014; 23: 1211–1220.

[21] Ritzi R, Lyles M. Social aspects of disenfranchised grief. In Turner RB, Stauffer SD (eds.) Disenfranchised Grief: Examining Social, Cultural, and Relational Impacts (pp. 72). 1st edition. New York. 2023.

[22] Gilbert S, Mullen J, Kelloway EK, Dimoff J, Teed M, McPhee T. The C.A.R.E. model of employee bereavement support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2021; 26: 405–420.

[23] Sharbanee JM, Greenberg LS. Emotion-focused therapy for grief and bereavement. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies. 2023; 22: 1–22.

[24] Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, Zisook S, Neimeyer R, Duan N, et al. Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety. 2011; 28: 103–117.

[25] Piper, W. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., Joyce, A. S., & Weideman, R. (2011). Risk factors for complicated grief. In W. E. Piper, J. S. Ogrodniczuk, A. S. Joyce, & R. Weideman, Short-term group therapies for complicated grief: Two research-based models (pp. 63–106). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12344-003

[26] Hansen KL, Guldin MB, Fosgerau CF. Grief participation rights and the social support hierarchy: exploring the communicative role of the bereaved in a social support interaction. Death Studies. 2024; 48: 465–477.

[27] Levant RF, Allen PA, Lien MC. Alexithymia in men: how and when do emotional processing deficiencies occur? Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2014; 15: 324–334.

[28] Williams KD, Nida SA. Ostracism and social exclusion: implications for separation, social isolation, and loss. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022; 47: 101353.

[29] McGuinness B. Grief in the workplace: developing a bereavement policy. Bereavement Care. 2009; 28: 2–8.

[30] Doka KJ. A primer on loss and grief. Living with grief: At work, at school, at worship (pp. 5–12). 1st edition. Routledge: New York. 2019.

[31] Vogel DL, Wade NG, Haake S. Measuring the self-stigma associated with seeking psychological help. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2006; 53: 325–337.

[32] Wong YJ, Rochlen AB. Demystifying men’s emotional behaviour. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2005; 6: 62–72.

[33] Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society. 2005; 19: 829–859.

[34] Pollack WS, Levant RF. New psychotherapy for men. 1st edition. Wiley: New York. 1998.

[35] Wetherell M, Edley N. Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology. 1999; 9: 335–356.

[36] Anderson E, McCormack M. Inclusive masculinity theory: overview, reflection and refinement. Journal of Gender Studies. 2018; 27: 547–561.

[37] Burr V. An introduction to social constructionism. 1st edition. Routledge: London. 1995.

[38] Berger PL, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. 1st edition. Doubleday & Company: New York. 1966.

[39] Murphy J, Hughes J, Read S, Ashby S. Evidence and practice: a review of vignettes in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher. 2021; 29: 8–14.

[40] Lapatin S, Gonçalves M, Nillni A, Chavez L, Quinn RL, Green A, et al. Lessons from the use of vignettes in the study of mental health service disparities. Health Services Research. 2012; 47: 1345–1362.

[41] Barter C, Renold E. “I wanna tell you a story”: exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2000; 3: 307–323.

[42] Wilks W. The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work. 2004; 3: 78–87.

[43] Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ. (eds.) APA handbook of research methods in psychology, research designs (pp. 57–71). 1st edition. American Psychological Association: Washington. 2012.

[44] Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. 1st Edition. SAGE Publications Ltd: London. 2013.

[45] Saldana JM. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 3rd edn. SAGE Publications: London. 2015.

[46] Hughes R. Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1998; 20: 381–400.

[47] Gray D, Royall B, Malson H. Hypothetically speaking: using vignettes as a stand-alone qualitative method. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, D. Gray (eds.) Collecting Qualitative Data (pp. 47–70). 1st Edition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 2017.

[48] Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity. 2021; 56: 1391–1412.

[49] Terry G, Hayfield N, Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In. Wiling C, Rogers W.S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 17–37). Sage Publications: London. 2017.

[50] Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2019; 11: 589–597.

[51] Frosh S. A brief introduction to psychoanalytic theory. 1st Edition. Bloomsbury: London. 2012.

[52] Price M. Convenience samples: what they are, and what they should (and should not) be used for. 2013. Available at: URL https://hrdag.org/2013/04/05/convenience-samples-what-they-are/ and date accessed 12th October 2021

[53] Tanhan A, Strack RW. Online photovoice to explore and advocate for Muslim biopsychosocial spiritual wellbeing and issues: ecological systems theory and ally development. Current Psychology. 2020; 39: 2010–2025.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top