Article Data

  • Views 392
  • Dowloads 130

Original Research

Open Access

Causal effects of psychiatric traits on the risk of urolithiasis in European and East Asian population: a Mendelian randomization analysis

  • Qinhong Jiang1,†
  • Caitao Dong1,†
  • Chuan Wang1
  • Rong Jiang1
  • Chao Song1,*,
  • Sixing Yang1,*,

1Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 430060 Wuhan, Hubei, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.127 Vol.20,Issue 8,August 2024 pp.35-47

Submitted: 02 January 2024 Accepted: 22 February 2024

Published: 30 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Chao Song E-mail: drsongchao@whu.edu.cn
*Corresponding Author(s): Sixing Yang E-mail: sxyang@whu.edu.cn

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

It has been reported in observation studies that psychiatric traits increase the risk of urolithiasis, but the causal association between them remains to be systematically reveal. Thus, this study aims to estimate the causal effect of psychiatric traits on urinary stones, utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. In the study, we collected data of eight psychiatric traits from summary-level genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia, insomnia, mood swing, anxiety and neuroticism. FinnGen consortium and BioBank Japan provided the GWAS data of urolithiasis. Three MR methodswere used in the study, in which inverse variance-weighted was employed as the primary analytic tool of causal reference. Furthermore, a meta-analysis combining the results from FinnGen and BioBank Japan was performed. In FinnGen, inverse variance-weighted analysis revealed that mood swing (p = 0.023, odds ratio (OR): 2.272, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122–4.600), neuroticism (p = 0.032, OR: 1.086, 95% CI: 1.007–1.171) and MDD (p = 0.014, OR: 1.259, 95% CI: 1.047–1.515) significantly increased the risk of urolithiasis, while schizophrenia (p = 0.026, OR: 0.944, 95% CI: 0.897–0.993) negatively associated with urolithiasis. In BioBank Japan, mood swing (p = 0.015, OR: 3.397, 95% CI: 1.273–9.062), neuroticism (p = 0.041, OR: 1.111, 95% CI: 1.004–1.228) and MDD (p = 0.006, OR: 1.435, 95%CI: 1.107–1.861) were found to have significant causality with urolithiasis. Combining meta-analysis revealed that mood swing (p = 0.001, OR: 2.606, 95% CI: 1.470–4.620), neuroticism (p = 0.003, OR: 1.095, 95% CI: 1.031–1.163) and MDD (p = 0.0003, OR: 1.316, 95% CI: 1.132–1.530) significantly increase the risk of urinary calculus, while schizophrenia (p = 0.04, OR: 0.959, 95% CI: 0.922–0.997) decrease the risk of urinary stones formation to our surprise.


Keywords

Psychiatric traits; Mendelian randomization; Urolithiasis; Causality


Cite and Share

Qinhong Jiang,Caitao Dong,Chuan Wang,Rong Jiang,Chao Song,Sixing Yang. Causal effects of psychiatric traits on the risk of urolithiasis in European and East Asian population: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(8);35-47.

References

[1] Becerra AZ, Khusid JA, Sturgis MR, Fink LE, Gupta M, Konety BR, et al. Contemporary assessment of the economic burden of upper urinary tract stone disease in the United States: analysis of one-year health care costs, 2011–2018. Journal of Endourology. 2022; 36: 429–438.

[2] Stamatelou K, Goldfarb DS. Epidemiology of kidney stones. Healthcare. 2023; 11: 424.

[3] Shastri S, Patel J, Sambandam KK, Lederer ED. Kidney stone pathophysiology, evaluation and management: core curriculum 2023. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2023; 82: 617–634.

[4] Kotsis V, Martinez F, Trakatelli C, Redon J. Impact of obesity in kidney diseases. Nutrients. 2021; 13: 4482.

[5] Almuhanna NR, Alhussain AM, Al-Damanhouril RB, Alabdullah QA. Association of chronic hyperglycemia with the risk of urolithiasis. Cureus. 2023; 15: e47385.

[6] West B, Luke A, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Cao G, Shoham D, Kramer H Metabolic syndrome and self-reported history of kidney stones: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2008; 51(5): 741-7.

[7] Soligo M, Morlacco A, Zattoni F, Valotto C, De Giorgi G, Beltrami P. Metabolic syndrome and stone disease. Panminerva Medica. 2022; 64: 344–358.

[8] Arzoz-Fabregas M, Roca-Antonio J, Ibarz-Servio L, Jappie-Mahomed D, Rodgers A. Stress–stones–stress–recurrent stones: a self-propagating cycle? Difficulties in solving this dichotomy. Urolithiasis. 2017; 45: 515–524.

[9] Wang M, Jian Z, Ma Y, Jin X, Li H, Wang K. Depression increases the risk of kidney stone: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey 2007–2018 and Mendelian randomization analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2022; 312: 17–21.

[10] Han X, Hou C, Yang H, Chen W, Ying Z, Hu Y, et al. Disease trajectories and mortality among individuals diagnosed with depression: a community-based cohort study in UK Biobank. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021; 26: 6736–6746.

[11] Arzoz-Fabregas M, Ibarz-Servio L, Edo-Izquierdo S, Doladé-Botías M, Fernandez-Castro J, Roca-Antonio J. Chronic stress and calcium oxalate stone disease: is it a potential recurrence risk factor? Urolithiasis. 2013; 41: 119–127.

[12] Davey Smith G, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014; 23: R89–R98.

[13] Ference BA, Holmes MV, Smith GD. Using Mendelian randomization to improve the design of randomized trials. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2021; 11: a040980.

[14] Slob EAW, Burgess S. A comparison of robust Mendelian randomization methods using summary data. Genetic Epidemiology. 2020; 44: 313–329.

[15] Demontis D, Walters RK, Martin J, Mattheisen M, Als TD, Agerbo E, et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nature Genetics. 2019; 51: 63–75.

[16] Wray NR, Ripke S, Mattheisen M, Trzaskowski M, Byrne EM, Abdellaoui A, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression. Nature Genetics. 2018; 50: 668–681.

[17] Trubetskoy V, Pardinas AF, Qi T, Panagiotaropoulou G, Awasthi S, Bigdeli TB, et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature. 2022; 604: 502–508.

[18] Stahl EA, Breen G, Forstner AJ, Mcquillin A, Ripke S, Trubetskoy V, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder. Nat Genet. 2019; 51: 793–803.

[19] Lyon MS, Andrews SJ, Elsworth B, Gaunt TR, Hemani G, Marcora E. The variant call format provides efficient and robust storage of GWAS summary statistics. Genome Biology. 2021; 22: 32.

[20] Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipila TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023; 613: 508–518.

[21] Kazuyoshi I, Masato A, Masahiro K, Atsushi T, Eiryo K, Hiroki S, et al. Large scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identified 45 novel susceptibility loci for 22 diseases. bioRxiv. 2019: 795948.

[22] Shu Y, Yang B, Liu X, Xu M, Deng C, Wu H. Causal effects from inflammatory bowel disease on liver function and disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023; 10: 1320842.

[23] Roze D. Causes and consequences of linkage disequilibrium among transposable elements within eukaryotic genomes. Genetics. 2023; 224: iyad058.

[24] Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, Surendran P, Burgess S, Danesh J, et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype–phenotype associations. Bioinformatics. 2019; 35: 4851–4853.

[25] Treur JL, Munafò MR, Logtenberg E, Wiers RW, Verweij KJH. Using Mendelian randomization analysis to better understand the relationship between mental health and substance use: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine. 2021; 51: 1593–1624.

[26] Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genetic Epidemiology. 2016; 40: 304–314.

[27] Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2015; 44: 512–525.

[28] Bouillon R, LeBoff MS, Neale RE. Health Effects of Vitamin D. Supplementation: lessons learned from randomized controlled trials and Mendelian randomization studies. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2023; 38: 1391–1403.

[29] Hemani G, Bowden J, Davey Smith G. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Human Molecular Genetics. 2018; 27: R195–R208.

[30] Anderson DJ, Aucoin A, Toups CR, Cormier D, Mcdonald M, Hasoon J, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms in depression: a review. Health Psychology Research. 2023; 11: 81040.

[31] Panicker JN, Selai C, Herve F, Rademakers K, Dmochowski R, Tarcan T, et al. Psychological comorbidities and functional neurological disorders in women with idiopathic urinary retention: international consultation on incontinence research society (ICI-RS) 2019. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2020; 39: S60–S69.

[32] Sakakibara R, Ito T, Yamamoto T, Uchiyama T, Yamanishi T, Kishi M, et al. Depression, anxiety and the bladder. LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2013; 5: 109–120.

[33] Jairam R, Drossaerts J, Vrijens D, Leue C, van Kerrebroeck P, van Koeveringe G. Affective symptoms and quality of life in patients with voiding or storage dysfunction: results before and after sacral neuromodulation: a prospective follow-up study. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2018; 37: 1801–1808.

[34] Basiri A, Kashi AH, Salehi Omran H, Borumandnia N, Golshan S, Narouie B, et al. National lifetime prevalence and demographic factors of urolithiasis in Iran. The Journal of Urology. 2023; 20: 102–108.

[35] Zeng G, Mai Z, Xia S, Wang Z, Zhang K, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross‐sectional study. BJU International. 2017; 120: 109–116.

[36] Nassir A. Prevalence and characterization of urolithiasis in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. Urology Annals. 2019; 11: 347–352.

[37] Martin SA, Tully PJ, Kahokehr AA, Jay A, Wittert GA. The bidirectional association between depression and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2022; 41: 552–561.

[38] Sinha S. Follow-up for the upper urinary tract in patients with high-risk neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. World Journal of Urology. 2023; 41: 3309–3316.

[39] Zhang X, Ma L, Li J, Zhang W, Xie Y, Wang Y. Mental health and lower urinary tract symptoms: results from the NHANES and Mendelian randomization study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2024; 178: 111599.

[40] Arzoz-Fàbregas M, Ibarz-Servio L, Fernández-Castro J, Valiente-Malmagro M, Roca-Antonio J, Edo-Izquierdo S, et al. Chronic stress and calcium oxalate stone disease: influence on blood cortisol and urine composition. Urology. 2013; 82: 1246–1252.

[41] Pu J, Liu Y, Gui S, Tian L, Yu Y, Song X, et al. Metabolomic changes in animal models of depression: a systematic analysis. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021; 26: 7328–7336.

[42] Opanković A, Milovanović S, Radosavljević B, Čavić M, Besu Žižak I, Bukumirić Z, et al. Correlation of ionized Magnesium with the parameters of oxidative stress as potential biomarkers in patients with anxiety and depression: a pilot study. Dose-Response. 2022; 20: 15593258221116741.

[43] Black CN, Bot M, Scheffer PG, Cuijpers P, Penninx BWJH. Is depression associated with increased oxidative stress? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015; 51: 164–175.

[44] Saenz-Medina J, Munoz M, Rodriguez C, Contreras C, Sanchez A, Coronado MJ, et al. Hyperoxaluria induces endothelial dysfunction in preglomerular arteries: involvement of oxidative stress. Cells. 2022; 11: 2306.

[45] Liu SP, Lin CC, Lin HC, Chen YH, Yu HJ. Association between schizophrenia and urinary calculi: a population-based case-control study. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e56942.

[46] Wu Q, Liu S, Huang X, Liu J, Wang Y, Xiang Y, et al. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization study of psychiatric disorders and Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2023; 15: 1120615.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top