Article Data

  • Views 1385
  • Dowloads 137

Original Research

Open Access

MALE BARIATRIC PATIENTS SIX YEARS LATER: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

  • Darren D. Moore1,2
  • Pooja Mamidana2,3
  • Miciah Lyons4,5
  • Traci Holmes4,5
  • Felicia Jefferson4,5

1Touro University Worldwide, Edith Neumann School of Health and Human Services, Marriage and Family Therapy Program, Los Alamitos, CA, USA

2Moore Organization for Obesity Research and Education Laboratories, I AM MOORE, LLC, Columbus, GA, USA

3California School of Professional Psychology, Couple and Family Therapy Program, Alliant International University, San Francisco, CA, USA

4Fort Valley State University, College of Arts and Sciences, Biology Academic Department, Fort Valley, GA, USA

5Neuroscience and Bioengineering Laboratories, College of Arts and Sciences, Biology Academic Department, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA, USA

DOI: 10.22374/jomh.v15i3.102 Vol.15,Issue 3,July 2019 pp.56-70

Published: 02 July 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Darren D. Moore E-mail: Mooredd2012@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and objective

Researchers have suggested that while bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, patients still experience difficulties in maintaining initial weight loss, over time. The purpose of this study was to explore men’s experiences after 6 or more years of weight loss surgery.

Material and methods

Utilizing qualitative research, the authors conducted a 6-year follow-up investigation to a previous study regarding life after bariatric surgery among male patients. In this study, the authors completed 13 semi-structured interviews with male bariatric patients and explored their lived experiences as indi-viduals and as partners within couple relationships.

Results

The study found three emerging themes: (1) weight loss as a struggle, (2) fading support and feeling alone, and (3) perceptions of marriage and family therapists.

Conclusion

This discusses clinical implications and recommendations for marriage and family therapists and other allied health professionals who may work with males transitioning beyond the initial phase of the weight loss surgical process to include continued social support and utilizing a relational perspective for male patients.

Keywords

obesity; weight loss; bariatric surgery; male patients; qualitative research; post-operative

Cite and Share

Darren D. Moore,Pooja Mamidana,Miciah Lyons,Traci Holmes,Felicia Jefferson. MALE BARIATRIC PATIENTS SIX YEARS LATER: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?. Journal of Men's Health. 2019. 15(3);56-70.

References

1. Sung-Chan P, Sung YW, Zhao X, et al. Family-based models for childhood-obesity intervention: A systematic review of randomized controlled tri-als. Obes Rev 2013;14(4):265–78.

2. Moore D, Willis M. Men’s experiences and per-spectives of social support after weight-loss sur-gery. J Men’s Health 2016;12(2): 25–34.

3. Young MT, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of male vs. female patients who underwent bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surgeons 2016;222(3):226–31.

4. Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, et al. Benefits of bariatric surgery do not reach obese men. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2015;25(3):196–201.

5. Mazzeo SE, Saunders R, Mitchell KS. Gender and binge-eating among bariatric surgery candi-dates. Eat Behav 2006;7(1):47–52.

6. Moore D, Cooper C. Life after bariatric surgery: Perceptions of male patients and their intimate relationships. J Marital Fam Ther 2016;43(3): 495–508. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12155.

7. Natvik E, Gjengedal E, Moltu C, et al. Translating weight loss into agency: Men’s experiences 5 years after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 2015;10(1):27729.

8. Arterburn D, Livingston EH, Schifftner T, et al. Predictors of long-term mortality after bariatric surgery performed in Veterans Affairs medical centers. Arch Surg 2009;144(10):914–20.

9. Connelly LM. What is phenomenology? Medsurg Nurs 2010;19(2):127–29.

 10. Groenewald T. A phenomenological research design illustrated. Int J Qual Methods 2004;3(1): 42–55.

 11. Lewis S. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health Promot Pract 2015;16(4):473–75.

 12. Thomson R, Holland J. Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2003;6(3):233–44.

 13. Britten N. Qualitative research: Qualitative inter-views in medical research. BMJ 1995;311(6999): 251–53.

 14. Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, et al. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 2008; 204(8):429.

 15. Chen A, Gussenhoven C, Rietveld T. Language-specificity in the perception of paralinguistic into-national meaning. Lang Speech 2004;47(4): 311–49.

 16. Sikorski W. Paralinguistic communication in the therapeutic relationship. Arch Psychiatry Psychother 2012;1:49–54.

 17. Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. J Res Nurs 2008;13(1):68–75.

 18. Sgier L. Qualitative data analysis. An Initiat Gebert Ruf Stift 2012;April 19:19–21.

 19. Basit T. Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educ Res 2003;45(2):143–54.

 20. Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth, B.M., editor. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Infor-mation and Library Science. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO; 2016.

 21. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, et al. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and valid-ity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2002;1(2):13–22.

 22. Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res 2015;15(2):219–34.

 23. Tufford L, Newman P. Bracketing in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work 2012;11(1):80–96.

 24. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45(3):214–22.

 25. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthi-ness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inform 2004;22(2):63–75.

 26. Bradley LE, Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, et al. Project HELP: A remotely delivered behavioral intervention for weight regain after bariatric sur-gery. Obes Surg 2017;27(3):586–98.

 27. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2004;240(3):416.

 28. Mobarki H, Bian F. How much weight loss is expected after each type of bariatric surgery procedure? Bioactive Compounds Health Dis 2018;1(1):217–20.

 29. Perez-Pevida B, Aldhwayanand M, Gibson R, et al. Poor responsiveness after bariatric surgery: Clinical and eating behaviour characteristics. Obes Update 2018; 53. BioScientifica.

 30. Rusch MD, Andris D. Maladaptive eating pat-terns after weight-loss surgery. Nutr Clin Pract 2007;22(1):41–49.

 31. Jung J, Forbes GB, Chan P. Global body and muscle satisfaction among college men in the United States and Hong Kong-China. Sex Roles 2010;63(1–2):104–17.

 32. Yang CFJ, Gray P, Pope Jr HG. Male body image in Taiwan versus the West: Yanggang Zhiqi meets the Adonis complex. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(2):263–69.

 33. Sobal J. Men, meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food Foodways 2005;13(1–2): 135–58.

 34. Sierra Hernandez CA, Han C, Oliffe JL, et al. Understanding help-seeking among depressed men. Psychol Men Masculinity 2014; 15(3): 346.

 35. Willott S, Griffin C. ‘Wham bam, am I a man?’: Unemployed men talk about masculinities. Feminism Psychol 1997;7(1):107–28.

 36. Artazcoz L, Cortès I, Escribà-Agüir V, et al. Understanding the relationship of Long work-ing hours with health status and health-related behaviours. J Epidemiology Commun Health 2009;63(7):521–27.

 37. Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: A national population- based analysis. Surg Obes Related Dis 2010;6(1): 8–15.

 38. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2011;12(2):142–48.

 39. McGoldrick M, Carter B, Garcia-Preto N. The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2011.

 40. Neill JR, Marshall JR, Yale CE. Marital changes after intestinal bypass surgery. J Am Med Assoc 1978;240(5):447–50.

 41. Anderson WA, Greene GW, Forse RA, et al. Weight loss and health outcomes in African Americans and whites after gastric bypass surgery. Obes 2007;15(6):1455–63.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top