Main Article Content
Competition anxiety, Confidence, Home and away games, Home advantage, Soccer players
Background and Objective: This study aimed to verify the modulation effects of home and away games based on the relationships between competition anxiety and confidence of soccer players and provide basic data for improving the performance of soccer players.
Material and Methods: A survey was conducted with 336 professional soccer players from the Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Busan areas who were registered with the Korea Football Association as of 2016. In addition, for all data collected, multigroup structural equation modeling analysis and pairwise parameter comparison analysis were conducted.
Results: The results of the analyses indicated competition anxiety had a significantly greater effect on self-confidence in the away group than in the home group (home: –9.7%; away: –55.7%). Pairwise parameter comparisons showed z = 2.532 was greater than the rejection criteria (±1.96: α = 0.05; ±2.58: α = 0.01), with a significant modulation effect at the 95% confidence level.
Conclusion: These results indicated that effective reduction in anxiety would improve players’ confidence and thereby improve their performance in away games.
2. Jang SY, Cho EH. An Analysis of the Sport Confidence Construct: Competitive Sports. Korean J Measurement Eval Phys Educ Sport Sci 2014;16(1):23–36.
3. Vealey RS. Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation Preliminary investigation and instrument development. J Sport Psychol 1986;8:221–46.
4. Beattie S, Hardy L, Woodman T. Precompetition con-fidence: The role of the self. J Sport Exercise Psychol 2004;26:427–41.
5. Kane TD, Marks MA, Zaccaro SJ, et al. Self-efficacy, personal goals, and wrestlers’ self-regulation. J Sport Exercise Psychol 1996;18:36–48.
6. Martin JJ. Training and performance self-efficacy, af-fect, and performance in wheelchair rod racers. Sport Psychol 2002;16:384–95.
7. Edward T, Kingston K, Hardy L, Gould D. A qualitative analysis of catastrophic performances and the associ-ated thoughts, feeling, and emotions. Sport Psychol 2002;16:1–19.
8. Hanton S, Connaughton D. Perceived control of anxi-ety and its relationship to confidence and performance: A qualitative inquiry. Res Quarter Exercise Sport 2002;73:87–97.
9. Balmer NJ, Nevil AM, William AM. Home advantage in the Winter Olympics (1908-1998). J Sports Sci 2001;19:129–39.
10. Balmer NJ, Nevil AM, William AM. Modelling home advantage in the Summer Olympic Games. J Sports Sci 2003;21:469–78.
11. Pollard R, Pollard G. Long-term trends in home ad-vantage in professional team sports in North America and England (1876-2003). J Sport Sci 2005;23:337–50.
12. Martens R, Burton D, Vealey RS, et al. Competitive anxiety in sport. In: R Martens, RS Vealey, and D Burton (Eds.), Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1990.
13. Hollenbeck GP, Hall DT. Confidence and leader perfor-mance. Organiz Dynam 2004;33(3):254–69.
14. Koivula N, Hassmén P, Fallby J. Self-esteem and perfec-tionism in elite athletes: Effects on competitive anxiety and confidence. Personal Individ Diff 2002;32(5):865–75.
15. Carron AV, Loughead TM, Bray SR. The home advantage in sport competitions: The Courneya & Carron conceptual framework a decade later. J Sport Sci 2005;23:395–407.
16. Andrews B, Wilding JM. The relation of depression and anxiety to life- stress and achievement in students. Br J Psychol 2004;95(4):509–21.